Tuesday, July 31, 2018

England announce playing XI for 1st Test against India

England captain Joe Root has confirmed the team for the first Test against India starting at Edgbaston on Wednesday (August 1).

Root announced that Moeen Ali and Jamie Porter will miss out of the playing XI from the 13-man squad named for England’s 1000th Test.

Root has also announced Jos Buttler as England’s vice-captain for the five-match Test series.

Jos-Buttler

The 27 year old, Buttler, is already vice-captain for England’s ODI side, ranked No. 1 in the latest ICC team rankings.

He was recalled to the Test squad at the start of the summer for the Test series against Pakistan and scored two half-centuries in his three innings.

England’s playing XI:

  1. Alastair Cook
  2. Keaton Jennings
  3. Joe Root (c)
  4. Dawid Malan
  5. Jonny Bairstow (w)
  6. Ben Stokes
  7. Jos Buttler
  8. Sam Curran
  9. Adil Rashid
  10. Stuart Broad
  11. James Anderson


from Blog – CricketTrolls.com https://ift.tt/2K9Kz3q

India tour of New Zealand 2019 schedule released

India’s men’s and women’s team are set to tour New Zealand in January next year to play ODI and T20 international series. While the men’s team will play five one-dayers and three T20 games, the women’s team will square off in three ODIs and as many T20Is.

All the three T20Is, played in Wellington, Auckland and Hamilton, will be double headers. The women’s team will play their ODIs in Napier, Mt Maunganui and Hamilton. One-dayers at each of the venue will be preceded by a game of the men’s team.

Harmanpreet Kaur, Smriti Mandhana

NZC chief operating officer Anthony Crummy said: “It’s exciting to have the India men’s and women’s team here. The men are currently ranked No.2 in ODIs and T20s – and the women arrive as ICC Cricket World Cup finalists.

“It’s also healthy to be driving greater exposure and appeal in the women’s game. All six of the WHITE FERNS’ fixtures will be televised live for the first time in New Zealand history.”

Mr. Crummy noted that, apart from the second T20 on February 8 at Eden Park, all the India men’s games would start and finish an hour later than usual, as per NZC’s agreement with Indian broadcaster, Star Sports.

“NZC would’ve liked to have scheduled more India matches at Eden Park in Auckland but was unable to do so because of restrictions at the venue,” Crummy said.

The ‘A’ teams of the two countries will also take on each other during the New Zealand summer. They will play three four-dayers at Mt Maunganui, Seddon Park and Cobham Oval, followed by three 50-over games – all to be played at Bay Oval.

India tour of New Zealand 2019:

Men:

  • January 23: First ODI (Napier)
  • January 26: Second ODI (Mt Maunganui)
  • January 28: Third ODI (Mt Maunganui)
  • January 31: Fourth ODI (Hamilton)
  • February 3: Fifth ODI (Wellington)
  • February 6: First T20I (Wellington)
  • February 8: Second T20I (Auckland)
  • February 10: Third T20I (Hamilton)

Women:

  • January 24: First ODI (Napier)
  • January 29: Second ODI (Mt Maunganui)
  • February 1: Third ODI (Hamilton)
  • February 6: First T20I (Wellington)
  • February 8: Second T20I (Auckland)
  • February 10: Third T20I (Hamilton)


from Blog – CricketTrolls.com https://ift.tt/2LNAgqB

Monday, July 30, 2018

A STUDY IN IMPACT, FINAL PART – WHY HANIF HAD MORE IMPACT THAN LONG TOM

This feature follows on from part one and part two, which reviewed the impact of all Test players’ batting. This final part combines the two previous studies and confirms the most impactful Test batsmen of all time, based on the same yardstick of impact measurement.

That yardstick is of course Donald Bradman, insofar as his impact value is compared to that of all other batsmen and extrapolated to give an equivalent impact average on the same scale as traditional batting average. The method is as follows.

The match impact rating that I proposed previously is expressed as a percentage per Test, e.g. Garry Sobers’ match impact per Test might be worth say 21%, whereas Dennis Lillee might be worth 19%, but those figures don’t really mean much to anyone else but me as there’s no real frame of reference. So what I decided to do was to a) separate out the impact solely based on each player’s batting, then b) extrapolate that to a value which is equivalent to the range of Test batting averages, with the intent being to provide a rating scale with which those who follow cricket would be familiar (I may at some point in the future repeat this exercise for bowling and fielding).

I assumed that the obvious basis to scale from is Don Bradman. As was seen with my full impact exercise Bradman is the highest rated pure batsman (no adjustment for opponent) and as a result will have the highest impact purely from batting, so we can use his batting impact rating and Test batting average from which to scale. In order to scale the other batsmenI had to first run Bradman’s batting impact separation first and this gave me a figure of 22.06% – that is the equivalent impact average figure based on Bradman’s batting alone which is equated to his batting average of 99.94. In this way, once I ran each player’s batting impact I could then scale it to an equivalent batting average scale by comparing it to Bradman and basing it on a batting average of 99.94.

The Impactful 30

So without further ado, below is the list of the top 30 most impactful Test batsmen, based on match impact transposed to an equivalent impact batting average and the yardstick of Don Bradman’s impact.

RANK PLAYER EQUIV AVG ACT AVG INCREASE TESTS YEARS
30 Stanley Jackson (Eng) 53.78 48.79 +10.22% 20 13
29 Victor Trumper (Aus) 53.82 39.05 +37.83% 48 13
28 Rohan Kanhai (WI) 53.96 47.53 +13.52% 79 18
27 Virender Sehwag (Ind) 54.05 49.34 +9.54% 104 13
26 Rahul Dravid (Ind) 54.09 52.31 +3.41% 164 17

The above shows Player Rank, Player Name, Equivalent Impact Batting Average, Actual Batting Average, Percentage Increase/Decrease, Number of Tests and Test Career Duration. I’ve included the duration of their careers for comparison as opposed to simply number of Tests, as many more Test matches were played in Dravid’s modern times as compared to Trumper and Jackson. As we can see, Trumper’s impact was massive as compared to his batting average, and his equivalent average is now comparable to all of the players listed above.

RANK PLAYER EQUIV AVG ACT AVG INCREASE TESTS YEARS
25 Matthew Hayden (Aus) 54.27 50.74 +6.96% 103 16
24 Dudley Nourse (SA) 54.50 53.82 +1.26% 34 17
23 Younis Khan (Pak) 54.86 52.05 +5.40% 118 18
22 Ken Barrington (Eng) 54.95 58.67 -6.33% 82 14
21 Bruce Mitchell (SA) 55.04 48.89 +12.59% 42 21

Bruce Mitchell is rarely if ever mentioned among the Test batting greats, however his equivalent impact average is higher than all of the batsmen so far listed. Of his debut innings in England in 1929, Wisden noted ‘As an exhibition of patience and restraint, his innings was quite remarkable.’ His most famous innings however was his 164* at Lord’s, an innings which was ranked as the 14th best ever Test century in Masterly Batting, wherein it was described by Richard Parry as ‘an innings of patience and determination, the ultimate acceptance of responsibility by a man who was able to lift his performance and to seize the moment. Not only that, his innings was filled with classic batting from a talented natural stroke player who had built his international career restraining his attacking instincts in the service of a weak team.’ At that time, Mitchell was ranked third in the world according to the ICC Rankings, behind only Bradman and Headley and ahead of the likes of Sutcliffe, Hammond and McCabe.

RANK PLAYER EQUIV AVG ACT AVG INCREASE TESTS YEARS
20 Aubrey Faulkner (SA) 55.18 40.79 +35.28% 25 19
19 Walter Hammond (Eng) 55.36 58.46 -5.30% 85 21
18 Neil Harvey (Aus) 55.59 48.42 +14.80% 79 16
17 Greg Chappell (Aus) 55.77 53.86 +3.54% 87 15
16 Garry Sobers (WI) 55.90 57.78 -3.25% 93 21

Four all-tme batting greats here…and Aubrey Faulkner. Faulkner is widely considered as one of the best ever all-rounders, however he was so dominant that he was separately ranked number one as a batsman, bowler and all-rounder during his Test career. In fact, his career-best ICC batting rating of 877 is better than was ever achieved by Rohan Kanhai, Colin Cowdrey, Graham Gooch, Inzamam-ul-Haq and Glenn Turner, among others. Nice to see Neil Harvey well represented here by his equivalent impact average – his batting average sees him ranked number 50 all-time (20 Tests minimum), whereas measured by his actual impact he ranks 18. Hammond, Chappell and Sobers are less affected and rate equally well whether impact or batting average is considered.

RANK PLAYER EQUIV AVG ACT AVG INCREASE TESTS YEARS
15 Everton Weekes (WI) 56.04 58.62 -4.40% 48 11
14 Jacques Kallis (SA) 56.63 55.37 +2.27% 166 19
13 Mmd Yousuf (Pak) 57.26 52.29 +9.51% 90 13
12 George Headley (WI) 58.12 60.83 -4.45% 22 25
11 Graeme Smith (SA) 58.62 48.25 +21.50% 117 13

George Headley is negatively affected as regards impact, as was his batting average, by continuing to play after World War II, when he was aged 45. Had he retired after 1939, his batting average would have been 66.72 as against his final average of 60.83; considering his equivalent impact average, the difference is 68.18 as against 58.12 – that impact average of 68.18 would have ranked him second of all time behind Bradman. Graeme Smith, described by CW’s Gareth Bland as a colussus, was responsible for three of the highest batting impact matches of all time, culminating with the 154* at Edgbaston which ranked number three of all time in the aforementioned Masterly Batting – Rob Smyth’s account in that book was described in the book review section of the 2014 Wisden as ‘one of the best pieces of cricket writing of the year, in any medium.’ As the following extract shows, the plaudits are well deserved:- ‘On a personal level, Smith upgraded the archetypal captain’s innings for the 21st century. It had all the over-my-dead-body qualities associated with the genre, but its purpose was victory rather than the avoidance of defeat…Smith bent a match, a series and even history itself to his granite will’.

RANK PLAYER EQUIV AVG ACT AVG INCREASE TESTS YEARS
10 Sachin Tendulkar (Ind) 58.80 53.78 +9.34% 200 25
9 Kumar Sangakkara (SL) 59.12 57.40 +3.00% 134 16
8 Sunil Gavaskar (Ind) 59.53 51.12 +16.45% 125 17
7 Len Hutton (Eng) 60.84 56.67 +7.36% 79 19
6 Steve Smith (Aus) 61.57 61.37 +0.32% 64 19

I recently watched the Sachin biopic and, my goodness, he looks breathtaking in full flow. One of the criticisms of Tendulkar is that he didn’t get it done when it mattered, but a 9.34% increase over his batting average would suggest that this is an overstatement. He also rates ahead of many batsmen who outrank him in the ICC Player Rankings. Tendulkar is slightly behind his countryman Sunil Gavaskar in terms of impact.

RANK PLAYER EQUIV AVG ACT AVG INCREASE TESTS YEARS
5 Herbert Sutcliffe (Eng) 62.11 60.73 +2.27% 54 12
4 Graeme Pollock (SA) 63.11 60.97 +3.51% 23 8
3 Jack Hobbs (Eng) 65.96 56.95 +15.83% 61 23
2 Brian Lara (WI) 68.14 52.88 +28.85% 131 17
1 Don Bradman (Aus) 99.94 99.94 0.00% 52 21

Hobbs and Lara receive very large improvements based on impact, Hobbs now ranking ahead of his long-time opening partner Herbert Sutcliffe, which is not the case when batting average is used as a measure.

Review
A comparison of the impact top 30 ranking against the top 30 when ranked by batting average shows 20 of the impact top 25 also appearing in the batting top 30, 9 of the top 10 and all of the top 5 repeated, though the order is somewhat different – the correlation coefficient is about +0.5, which is halfway between an exact match and no match at all. While those numbers might suggest that the impact average is not providing much more information about actual impact than is the batting average does, this can be further investigated by reviewing those batsmen who have gained or lost the most in the comparison.

The top and bottom of it

The lists below show the top movers in terms of difference between impact equivalent and batting average, both positive and negative.

LARGEST INCREASES BY RUNS

INCREASE PLAYER
+15.26 Lara
+14.77 Trumper
+14.39 Faulkner
+11.23 Herbie Taylor
+10.20 Gooch

LARGEST INCREASES BY PERCENTAGE

INCREASE PLAYER
+37.83% Trumper
+35.28% Faulkner
+31.26% Dave Nourse
+28.85% Lara
+27.54% Herbie Taylor

The above suggests that the impact measure is offsetting any era scoring differences.

LARGEST DECREASES BY RUNS

INCREASE PLAYER
-11.90 Voges
-7.02 Pujara
-6.37 Graveney
-4.71 Root
-4.63 M Amarnath

LARGEST DECREASES BY PERCENTAGE

INCREASE PLAYER
-19.23% Voges
-14.93% W Rhodes
-14.35% Graveney
-13.90% Pujara
-10.88% M Amarnath

Voges benefits from often coming into bat with his side well in front, so it’s not surprising that his equivalent impact average is significantly inferior to his batting average. I admit to being quite surprised by ‘Long’ Tom Graveney’s presence on the above list, we’ll discuss that in more detail later.

The lists with largest increase and decrease demonstrate that there are significant changes in some batsmen’s ranking based on the measurement of impact. Below I’ve included some direct comparisons of players with similar impact or batting averages:-

– Victor Trumper and Clyde Walcott

In terms of batting average, Walcott is far ahead of Trumper, 56.59 to 39.05, whereas in terms of equivalent impact average Trumper’s is slightly higher, 53.82 to 53.73. While some of this may be explained away by era differences, the increase/difference lists suggest otherwise, and in any case is certainly not true for the following two comparisons.

– Neil Harvey and Ken Barrington

Barrington’s average is more than ten runs higher than Harvey’s, 58.67 to 48.42, whereas Harvey’s impact average is higher than Barrington’s, 55.59 to 54.95.

– Glenn Turner and Zaheer Abbas

Zed averages 44.80 which compares with Turner’s batting average of 44.64, but impact-wise Turner is far ahead, 52.46 to 40.91. The second and third comparisons cannot be explained by era scoring differentials.

So what about Graveney?

As regards the various movers up and down, the one which surprised me the most was Graveney. When I was younger, my dad spoke highly of Tom Graveney and I therefore held him in high regard myself, plus most of what I read of him lauded his elegant and stylish batting. Given that the impact measurement downgrades him significantly, I decided to compare Graveney with a batsman from the same era having a similar batting average but a higher impact measure, namely Hanif Mohammad. Graveney played from 1951-1969, while Hanif debuted one year later and retired the same year as Graveney. As regards batting average, Graveney’s was 44.38, Hanif’s 43.98. However with the impact measure Graveney rates at 38.01, Hanif at 52.37, a massive difference.

I decided to review every Test match in which they played, and note the match status in terms of win probability each time they came in to bat, to try and pinpoint why the impact measures are so disparate. Below are the results:-

GRAVENEY

WIN% INNS NO RUNS AVG 100s 50s
0.6-1.0 51 7 2176 48.45 6 7
0.4-0.6 32 1 1587 51.19 4 4
0.0-0.4 39 4 1143 32.66 1 4

HANIF

WIN% INNS NO RUNS AVG 100s 50s
0.6-1.0 16 1 520 34.67 2 2
0.4-0.6 38 2 1581 43.92 6 7
0.0-0.4 42 4 1821 47.92 4 6

The above shows the batsman’s own team’s win probability on coming into bat, number of innings, not outs, batting average and 100s/50s under each situation, for each match scenario of ahead (0.6-1.0), balanced (0.4-0.6) and behind (0.0-0.4). We can see that Hanif performed at a much higher level than did Graveney when the chips were down, whereas Graveney did much better when his side was ahead and there was less pressure to perform.

Isolating those situations when the match was either in the balance or his side was behind, Hanif and Graveney compare as shown below:-

PLAYER INNS NO RUNS AVG 100s 50s
GRAVENEY 71 5 2730 41.36 5 8
HANIF 80 6 3402 45.97 10 13

We can see clearly that Hanif was a far superior performer under pressure, with twice as many centuries scored in only a few more innings. Granted, Pakistan was a lower quality team than the England team of the period of Graveney’s Test career and was not ahead very often when Hanif came in, but nonetheless Hanif clearly turned it on when it mattered most.

Martin Chandler’s piece on Long Tom revealed an interesting fact – in the first 55 Tests of Graveney’s career, played when he was between the ages of 24 and 36, Graveney scored 3107 runs at 41.02; after a three-year gap with no call from the selectors, Graveney returned for 24 more Tests between the ages of 39 and 42, and knocked up 1775 at 50.71, an increase of 9.69 runs on his average during that period. Was that difference in fortunes also reflected in his impact measure? His first 55 Tests were worth an equivalent impact average of 31.89, while the final 24 were worth 50.06, for a differential of 18.17, so the answer is a resounding yes.

While it is inarguable that Graveney was a stylish practitioner, his preference for batting under favourable match conditions was alluded to in his obituary in the Daily Telegraph:-

Yet Graveney did give the selectors cause for doubt. After his second Test, in which he untypically laboured for more than eight hours to amass 175 against India in Bombay at the end of 1951, he failed for many years to live up to his potential for England. To some he appeared too relaxed to steel himself to the rigours of Test cricket.

In particular, Graveney fell short in moments of crisis against Australia, the ultimate test for England batsmen. In 22 matches and 32 innings against Australia he would score only 1,075 runs, at an average of 31.61. Against the West Indies, by contrast, he made 1,532 runs in 31 innings, averaging 58.92.

The whisper went around that Graveney lacked the strength of character to succeed when the going got tough.

In summary

While those batsmen who fashion a high batting average typically have significant impact also, as this study has shown this is not always the case and there are batsmen whose batting average does not tell the full story of their contribution. I feel that the results discussed above have positively highlighted those batsmen who can be relied on to save or turn a match when called upon.

Which was the point all along.



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/2KcPwbQ

Kumar Sangakkara’s golden words of praise for Smriti Mandhana will make every Indian cricket fan proud

India’s opener Smriti Mandhana hit a half-century off just 18 balls in a Kia Super League (KSL) match, equalling the women’s T20 world record set by New Zealand’s Sophie Devine.

Mandhana has been in excellent form for Western Storm in the ongoing KSL, scoring 48 and 37 in the first two matches for her side, but went one better on 29 July, by going berserk against the Loughborough Lighting bowlers in a rain-affected match.

Mandhana, who became the first Indian to play in England’s premier women’s domestic T20 tournament, slammed five fours and four sixes to remain unbeaten at 52 off just 19 balls, as her side Storm amassed a total of 85 runs at the loss of two wickets.

Coincidentally, Devine was also playing in the match for Loughborough and scored an unbeaten 46. But, she couldn’t avert a defeat for her side who fell short by 18 runs.

It wasn’t really surprising to see her artistry with the willow taking the social media by storm, but it was Sri Lankan veteran Kumar Sangakkara who made Mandhana’s day.

Sangakkara, who was present at the ground where Mandhana recorded her feat, also took to Twitter and praised the Indian women cricketer.

“Watching @mandhana_smriti putting bowlers to the sword here at Taunton. She is brilliant to watch. Great ambassador and great skill,” his tweet read.

After impressing everyone on the field, Mandhana also gracefully endured the ‘fan moment’ when she got an opportunity to meet Sangakkara.

Sangakkara, Mandhana

The Indian southpaw clicked a picture with her role model and then shared it on Instagram with the caption: “This just made my day. A big fangirl moment for me. Can’t express how glad and overwhelmed I am. This memory is going to stay with me forever”.



from Blog – CricketTrolls.com https://ift.tt/2AAYzUv

Saturday, July 28, 2018

Wriddhiman Saha to undergo surgery in England

Indian wicket-keeper Wriddhiman Saha will undergo surgery in England after a sustained shoulder injury.

Saha’s wife, Romi, will also be travelling with him to England. Her visa application has been forwarded and is awaiting approval. Wriddhiman was given a choice to undergo a surgery at Mumbai or Manchester and the Bengal cricketer chose the latter.

“He was informed by the BCCI that surgery is the only option and that he could decide between Mumbai or Manchester to get the surgery done. His wife’s visa application has been forwarded by the board and the process shall be completed at the earliest.

Wriddhiman Saha wife

“The surgery will take place either at the end of this month or early next month, depending on when they finally arrive in England. It is too early to speak about his return and a call can only be taken after taking a look at his recovery speed. It could be anything between 6 to 8 months,” a BCCI official was quoted as saying.

It was earlier believed that Saha had a thumb injury but recently it has been disclosed that it was actually a shoulder injury sustained during Team India’s tour of South Africa.

“Saha’s rehabilitation had been completely goofed up. The NCA physio bungled it. Once he is done with surgery, he will not touch the bat for at least two months and then the rehab will start,” the official added.

Saha’s unfortunate injury came just after the Indian physio and the team management was blamed for aggravating Bhuvneshwar Kumar’s back injury.



from Blog – CricketTrolls.com https://ift.tt/2vhNsto

Olympic Cricket

It’s no secret that the International Cricket Council (ICC) is keen that cricket, in the form of T20 be re-introduced into the Olympics and that standing in its way is the mighty Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) for a myriad of reasons.

As most avid cricket fans are aware, cricket was played at the Olympics just once and that was in Paris of all places, in the second Olympics of 1900.

‘Great Britain’ beat ‘France’ in the only match for first and second place, the former consisting of English club cricketers from the Devon and Somerset Wanderers club which was touring France at the time. For the record, ‘Great Britain’ won by 157 runs after ‘France’ were skittled out for a measly 26 in their second innings (the match was played 12-a-side).

The British team had been founded by William Donne of Castle Cary six years earlier and was centred round the Castle Cary Cricket Club which provided five players as well as former pupils of Blundell’s School in Devon. The club in 2011 celebrated its 175th anniversary with a reenactment of the famous match. The French club was known as the Union des Societes Francaises de Sports Athletiques team. It was made up of players from the Standard Athletic and Union Clubs though other reports indicate it consisted mainly of British expats from the Embassy in Paris and included just one Frenchman.

Initially teams from France, Belgium, Holland and Great Britain were to participate but the organization of the Paris Games was chaotic and finally it was left to just these two teams.

But now Wales-based International Society of Olympic Historians (ISOH) member Hilary Evans has discovered cricket was slated to be played at the third Olympics at St. Louis, USA in 1904 as well

The dates released in the preliminary programme were September 12-13 and 14-15. So why was it cancelled, never to return again to the Olympics fold?

Evans has unearthed a report from the St. Louis Republic daily dated 18 July 1904 which states: “The Olympic cricket championships will be held the second week September…and will form an important part of the month’s programme. Entries have already been received from the Associated Cricket Club of Philadelphia [the bastion of cricket in America at the time] and many other prominent cricket clubs throughout the Eastern States and it is expected that a prominent Canadian cricket club will take part in the championship. England, the home of cricket, will probably send two or more teams to compete for the championship banner.”

It is a fact that after the successful staging of the first games of the modern era at Athens, Greece (where ancient Olympics originated) in 1896, Baron Pierre de Coubertin, the father of the modern Olympics, wanted Athens to be the permanent venue for all future Games. That of course did not happen and the 1900 and 1904 Olympics at Paris and St. Louis, which were staged in conjunction with the ‘World’s Fair’ were so chaotic that the entire modern Olympics movement was imperiled virtually at its birth.

There were very few National Olympic Committees (NOCs) till the 1920s and before that many entries were from clubs and individuals.

A report then appeared in the New York Tribune dated 30 August 1904 that cricket had been cancelled. ‘Good wicket couldn’t be got ready in time, it is announced’ was the headline for the report that stated: “Although every effort has been made to get a ground in readiness, it was found impossible to prepare a wicket suitable for matches to decide the championship of the United States (sic), and rather than play these on a poor ground, it was decided to abandon the whole project.”

The teams that were to be entered from England are not known but according to Evans, it is doubtful if these would have been county sides since the Olympics were strictly for amateurs, and so were probably amateur sides like I Zingari club side and others of its ilk.

One notable name was to represent Philadelphia. As reported in the famous journal Cricket: A Weekly Record of the Game (1 Sept. 1904), which was published from 1882 to 1914, John Barton ‘Bart’ King was part of the team. A fast bowler famed for his late in-swinging deliveries, he is considered even today the greatest cricketer to come from a non-Test playing nation, being also an exceptional batsmen.

King had great success while touring England three times with the ‘Philadelphia Gentlemen’ side (1897, 1903, 1908) and on his first tour he bowled the legendary KS Ranjitsinhji (‘Ranji’) for a first-ball duck while playing against Sussex.

The ICC is still hopeful that cricket could be included in the 2028 Olympics, venue yet to be decided. But there are formidable challenges ahead.

Gulu Ezekiel is an independent sports journalist and author based in New Delhi and has written over a dozen sports books.



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/2mRPRXT

Friday, July 27, 2018

Indian star player injured ahead of first Test against England

Indian batsmen had a fabulous outing in the only practice match ahead of the first Test against England scheduled to begin on August 1.

Playing against Essex, captain Virat Kohli, Murali Vijay, Dinesh Karthik, and KL Rahul made their performance count, scoring well compiled half-centuries in their first innings.

However, India’s premier spinner Ravichandran Ashwin suffered a minor hand injury during a net session and as a precautionary measure did not take field on the second day of the game.

The Indian team management said that the physio has taken a look and deduced that it was only a minor injury.

Ravi Ashwin

Also, the team management doesn’t want to take any chance as Bhuvneshwar Kumar and Jasprit Bumrah are already injured, and Ravi Ashwin is slated to play a crucial in the five-match Test series.

He is one of the most accomplished batsmen these days contributing in lower half of the batting order. The wickets in England are also assisting spinners because of the wear and tear so his role as a bowler is another key aspect of plans.



from Blog – CricketTrolls.com https://ift.tt/2ve0ZCr

Thursday, July 26, 2018

Patsy

He was christened Elias Henry Hendren, but few sources refer to EH Hendren, and no one ever called him Elias anyway. His teammates, in light of his Irish ancestry, called him ‘Murphy’, and his partner in so many major partnerships, ‘Young’ Jack Hearne, called him ‘Spud’. To the vast majority of people however he was simply ‘Patsy’, very possibly the most popular cricketer ever to have played the game.

Everybody liked Patsy. No one seemed to have a bad word for him and the warmth with which his name is mentioned is universal. That affection extended well beyond England. Patsy was well liked in Australia, and a caricature of him one of the favoured tools of Arthur Mailey. The much respected Australian Prime minister Robert Menzies described him as a warm-hearted human being who embodied and displayed the true character of cricket. England teammate Jack Hobbs wrote I do not know a more popular man, and Sir Pelham Warner referred to a lovable personality and a man who raised the status of the professional cricketer.

The importance of the name of Patsy Hendren stretched as far as India. In 1946 there had not been too many cricket books published in India, and of those that had appeared as far as I am aware all had Indian authors. One of them, SK Roy, decided to publish a book on Indian cricket and, presumably having met Patsy on the 1946 tour, persuaded him to put his name to it. Patsy had never played in India, and as far as I can tell had never visited the country, but such was his reputation that he was still entrusted with Cricket Musings, published in Calcutta in 1947.

Born in 1889 in Turnham Green in Middlesex, Patsy’s early life was frequently struck by tragedy. The loss of two brothers, a sister and both parents meant that he and his younger brother John were effectively brought up by their older brother, Denis. All three were talented sportsmen. Denis played for Middlesex between 1905 and 1907, although he never quite made the grade. Later he played for Durham and, just once in 1919, turned out with Patsy for Middlesex after the Great War. The brothers were unbeaten at the end of the match after putting on 24 for the seventh wicket to secure a draw. Denis went on to become a First Class umpire and stood between 1931 and 1957. John might have made it a hat trick of Middlesex players as, when the Great War ended the game in 1914, he was playing for the second eleven. In 1916 however, just 23 years old, he fell in the Battle of Delville Wood.

An all-round sportsman as a teenager Patsy played professional football for Brentford and neighbours Queens Park Rangers before moving to Lancashire and Manchester City where, still only 20, he played twice in the old First Division. Transferred the following season to Coventry City the diminutive (Patsy was only 5 feet 5 inches in height) winger played in 23 First Division matches scoring ten times. Injury then kept him out of the side the following season and he ended up back at Brentford in the old Southern League. After the War Patsy played regularly in the old Third Division (South) until, by then nearly 38, he hung up his boots in 1927. The pinnacle of his football career was an England Cap against Wales in 1919. It was not a full international, so like Denis Compton a generation later Patsy was not a true double international, but it is an impressive achievement nonetheless.

As a cricketer Patsy was a slow starter. He was always a fine fielder, whether in the slips or in the outfield, and his earliest matches for Middlesex were occasions when he was selected with those skills in mind as much as his batting. From his debut in 1907 it was four years before the first century came, and although he finally started to make strides in 1913 and 1914 at the outbreak of War Patsy’s batting record was no more than ordinary, 5,636 runs at 27.49. His war was relatively quiet. He joined the Army almost straight away but after months of training he was sent back to civilian life. After leaving school he had been an engineer, a job he had cared for very little, but his abilities in that field were now considered more important than military service. In time those priorities changed again and Patsy signed on once more in 1917.

When the First Class game resumed in 1919 Patsy was already 30, but there were almost 52,000 runs at 55.94 to come and as many as 164 centuries. When he finally called it a day at 48 he was the third highest run scorer of all time behind Hobbs and Frank Woolley, a position he retains and doubtless always will. That first post war summer, despite the unsuccessful introduction of two day matches in the Championship, saw Patsy’s average north of 60, and it stayed there the following summer when he totalled more than 2,500 runs for the first time. To add to his pleasure Middlesex won the title in both seasons and Patsy’s selection for the Ashes tour of 1920/21 was a formality.

Overall Patsy batted well in Australia. He averaged more than 61 and scored 271 against Victoria and Ted McDonald, but like all the Englishmen he found it more difficult in the Tests, famous for being the first 5-0 outcome in Test history. The Englishmen were certainly outplayed, although they had their moments. For Patsy there was a half century in each of the first three Tests, and two thirties in the fourth, but he did not go past 67. He fielded brilliantly however, and made many friends.

As a batsman Patsy was a stroke player. Like many short men he was particularly strong square of the wicket, but he had all the shots and the basic foundation of a sound technique. He was particularly noted for being a fine player of fast bowling and a fearsome hooker of the short ball. That point is worth making at this stage because at first blush Patsy’s record suggests that he was one of those who was suffering from shell shock when McDonald and Jack Gregory squared up to England in the return series in 1921. That Patsy had the worst series of his career is clear, but his problem was being a nervous starter rather than a poor player of extreme pace.

In his initial encounter with the Australian fast bowlers Patsy scored 20 for Lionel Robinson’s XI in the first match of the tour. Three weeks later, for the MCC at Lord’s, he scored 40 and 52 as the Australians scraped home by three wickets. His place in the side for the first Test was assured, but Trent Bridge was a disaster for England and Patsy. Batting first Patsy came in at 18-2. The first delivery he faced from Gregory pitched outside off stump and went through to the wicketkeeper. The next looked the same, but cut in and sent his off stump cartwheeling. In the second innings he was digging in but was then responsible for Donald Knight being run out. Unsettled by that it was McDonald’s turn to get through his defences. He was bowled for seven.

Retained for the second Test at Lord’s Patsy found himself in in a crisis again, 24-2. As with Gregory at Trent Bridge thus it was with McDonald at Lord’s. This time the first two deliveries went past the off stump, and it was the third that came back in and hit the stumps. His confidence now in shreds Patsy struggled in the second innings, but at least saw the fast men off. By then he had got to ten, but he immediately relaxed and edged the leg spin of Mailey to Gregory at slip. England subsided to a second embarrassing defeat, and this time Patsy was dropped, not to return when, later in the series, the Australians lost their edge and England drew the fourth and fifth Tests without too much difficulty.

Despite his disappointments Patsy still managed his 2,000 runs for the season but, given one last tilt at the Australians he still couldn’t loosen the shackles. At the Scarborough Festival he was selected for C.I Thornton’s XI. There was no Gregory in the Australian line up, and no need for McDonald to bowl at Patsy as, this time, Mailey and ‘Stork’ Hendry dismissed him for 2 and 1.

In a career that was to go on for another 16 summers Patsy’s record is an impressive one. Twice, in 1922 and 1923, he topped the First Class averages and in the following five years was third, second, fourth, fourth and sixth. In 1928 and 1933 he exceeded 3,000 runs and there were only three seasons, two of them right at the end of his career in 1935 and 1937, when he failed to make 2,000, and even then he didn’t miss by much. Three times there were 13 centuries in a season

Having lost his England place in 1921 a return to Test cricket for Patsy came in 1924 when South Africa visited England. In unfamiliar conditions the South Africans looked like they might lose 5-0 until rain saved them in the last two Tests. Patsy played in all five matches, although he only got to the wicket four times. His lowest score was 50* and the higher of his two centuries 142. He was, inevitably after those performances, on the boat to Australia for a second time in 1924/25.

England were defeated again in Australia, but this time the fourth Test was won, and England were unlucky to lose the third match by just 11 runs. Such were the ravages of injury to their bowlers in that match that Patsy had to turn his arm over and, in having Mailey stumped by Herbert Strudwick, he took his only Test wicket. The last wicket had added 73. On both ESPNCricinfo and Cricketarchive Patsy is described simply as right arm slow. What led Mailey to his doom is not recorded, but such a pair of characters would doubtless have derived much amusement from the dismissal.

With the bat Patsy scored 314 runs at an average of just under 40 but the big score still eluded him with, as on his previous trip, three fifties but no century. According to former Australian skipper Monty Noble, the only man to fully chronicle the series in book form, Patsy batted pretty well, but was rather more defensive in the Tests than Noble had expected.

The elusive century against Australia finally came at Lord’s in 1926. It was a strange series for Patsy. There was that unbeaten 127 at Lord’s, but that apart he hardly got going, his other five innings bringing him just 59 runs. He still averaged 62 however, dismissed only three times. His contributions to the famous match at the Oval when Hobbs and Sutcliffe batted so brilliantly on a sticky wicket to claim the series were just 8 and 15. Noble was rather more impressed this time however, writing of the innings at Lord’s; When we were young we were taught that to retire in the direction of the square leg umpire for any reason was a crime. Hendren does it purposely in order to slash the short pitched straight ball through the covers – and how he slashed it!

A third trip to Australia came Patsy’s way in 1928/29. It was a great success for the team and Patsy himself had his most successful Ashes series. Percy Chapman’s men retained the Ashes with a 4-1 victory, and for Patsy there were 472 runs at 52.44. He began with 169 and 45 in England’s massive 675 run victory at the old Exhibition Ground in Brisbane, and whilst he did not match that again there were two more half centuries, including 95 in the final Test. There was some criticism however, Percy Fender, a teammate in 1920/21, writing; Hendren was patchy. Sometimes entirely brilliant, and then, not in the real mood, one would be left to wonder how he had ever managed to achieve some of the wonderful things he has done.

In 1929 Patsy was an automatic selection for the Test side against the visiting South Africans, but he had a disappointing series, and was dropped from the side for the fifth Test after passing fifty just once in the first four. He still made his two thousand runs however, and the summer did give rise to one of the enduring stories about him. The occasion was Surrey’s visit to Lord’s at the end of August, and the man who the tale belongs to is Surrey pace bowler Alf Gover.

Not having played at Lord’s before Gover arrived early, and found Patsy around the dressing room. They made their introductions and Patsy asked Gover what he did. On being told he was a fast bowler Patsy queried whether that meant really fast, going on to explain that he was getting older, and didn’t like the short stuff, and that he hoped Gover would bear that in mind whilst bowling at him.

Like any young pace bowler Gover was more interested in taking Patsy’s wicket than sparing his blushes, so the line of his attack when Patsy came into face him was obvious. There were three balls left in the over and Gover thought that was all he would need. He dug the first one in, and Patsy hooked the ball in the direction of Father Time and into the stand. Gover tried again, and second time round improved as he conceded only four. Third time lucky? No, a third bouncer went the same way as the first.

As Gover walked disconsolately away Hobbs went up to his young teammate and asked why he had just bowled three bouncers at Patsy. Gover explained that Patsy did not like fast bowling. Anyone familiar with Hobbs will be able to imagine the breadth of the smile on his face when Gover added that Patsy himself had been the source of this information, and the way Gover’s face dropped when Hobbs assured him that Patsy was one of the finest hookers in the game. Is the story true? It certainly should be, but in truth it seems unlikely – although the match was Gover’s first at Lord’s it was not the first time he had encountered Patsy. The pair had met at the Oval the previous season, and Patsy had taken a century from Surrey, so one suspects the story is apocryphal, unfortunately.

Despite his poor showing against South Africa Patsy was still invited to travel to the West Indies with England in early 1930, although that did not of itself suggest he was still considered an automatic choice for England. Another side went to play Tests in New Zealand at the same time (the only time this has ever happened), and the likes of Hobbs, Herbert Sutcliffe, Harold Larwood, Walter Hammond, and Maurice Tate remained at home anyway. England were unable to beat West Indies, winning one Test, losing one and drawing the other two, but Patsy had a magnificent tour averaging 135.76 in all matches, and 115.50 in the Tests.

Having already made the point that Patsy was a great favourite it is perhaps worth noting a couple of points in the debit column from that West Indies tour, if for no other reason than to show however much he might have been a crowd pleaser Patsy was also a tough competitor. The first came in a match against Trinidad when, with Patsy on 96, he was caught at second slip by Learie Constantine from the unorthodox left arm spin bowling of ‘Puss’ Achong. When Patsy had taken guard Constantine had been at first slip, and as he departed the crease he had plenty to say to Constantine about a move he clearly thought to be contrary to the spirit of the game. Next, a few weeks later in the third Test, Patsy and England were fighting hard to avoid defeat by batting out time and Patsy played his full part in trying to slow the game down. As the overs passed and the clouds gathered Patsy was ninth man out, lbw to a decision he clearly didn’t relish. Patsy took an inordinate amount of time to make his way back to the pavilion. The delaying tactics almost worked, but justice was done as the skies did not open until just after the last England wicket fell.

1930 was the year of Donald Bradman, and Australia regained the Ashes by a 2-1 margin. His runs in the Caribbean ensured Patsy started the series. He made an important 72 in England’s win in the first Test, and 48 in a losing cause in the second at Lord’s but, after Australia scored 729-6 change was in the air and Patsy was the batsman who made way for Maurice Leyland. Back in the ranks at Middlesex the runs continued to flow and Patsy did make the trip to South Africa that winter when, playing in all five Tests, he averaged 47.00 and, so it seemed, closed his Test career in some style.

In 1931 Patsy sustained, for the only time in his career, a serious injury. The match concerned was the Championship fixture at Lord’s between Middlesex and Nottinghamshire. Patsy, accompanied by his wife, bumped into Larwood as they entered the ground. Patsy and Larwood were of course old friends, and Mrs Hendren jokingly chided the Notts Express about not hitting Patsy. Larwood smiled and said he would ‘knock his block off’. Larwood did not normally bother to bounce Patsy, who he regarded as being as good a hooker of a cricket ball as he had seen. On this occasion he did however drop one short, Patsy went for the hook, made a rare misjudgement and was struck on the head. He went down like a light, his body twitching and terrifying all who were present. Patsy was rushed off to hospital, but fortunately was well enough a few hours later to reassure Larwood that he was not at fault. He still missed a couple of matches, a rare occurrence in those days.

Two years later, faced with the prospect of West Indians Learie Constantine and Manny Martindale bowling leg theory at Lord’s Patsy walked out to bat for Middlesex wearing a cap with not only a standard peak but what amounted to two more, protecting his temples, a piece of protective equipment designed and made by Mrs Hendren. The press and public did not approve. Patsy found the contraption too hot and did not make many runs, so the ensuing storm quickly died down. It is interesting to contrast the 1930s reaction with the safety first attitudes of the 21st century. It is notable that in a 1969 biography Ian Peebles, a former teammate who must have known the truth to be different, suggested that Patsy had never actually worn the three peaked cap in match conditions.

By the time Bradman returned to England in 1934 ‘Bodyline’ had come and gone and, at 45, Patsy was definitely a veteran. Early in the tour he was picked to represent MCC against the tourists, and scored a century. A fortnight later he scored a century against them for Middlesex and found himself back in the side for the first Test. He missed the fifth Test due to injury but retained his place throughout what was a difficult series for England. A confident 79 marked his entry back into the side in the first Test and he scored 132, his last Test century, and shared a partnership of 191 with Leyland in the third match.

Patsy’s reward for his efforts against Australia was another trip to the Caribbean, although he was nothing like as successful as on his previous visit. Four times he got to 38 in his eight visits to the crease, but in none of them did he go beyond 41. His best knock was probably the 20 he scored in the remarkable victory at Kensington Oval in the first Test (the story of which is told in this feature), but West Indies triumphed in the end, winning the series 2-1.

After returning from the Caribbean Patsy had a good summer in 1935 before in 1936, by now 47, he scored 2,654 runs, the fifth highest tally of his career. This was the season in which an 18 year old debutant made his 1,000 for the season and, in Denis Charles Scott Compton, Lord’s found a new hero. Patsy bowed out the following year, still not far short of 2,000 runs, but both Compton and Bill Edrich exceeded his tally, and he could retire safe in the knowledge that the county’s batting was in safe hands.

After retiring from Middlesex Patsy moved on to pastures new, as coach at Harrow School, a job he remained in until 1952. Then it was back to Lord’s for the 63 year old as he took the job of Middlesex scorer. It was congenial employment for a man who, if not wealthy, had enjoyed a comfortable living from the game. He had been granted two benefits in 1923 and 1931 as well as a testimonial in 1935. He remained in the scorebox until 1960 when, struggling with what would now be recognised as Alzheimers, he felt obliged to resign. Patsy Hendren was 73 when he died in 1962, a matter of weeks after the passing of brother Denis. Neither brother’s marriage had been blessed with children, so the line died with them.



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/2OhCdKt

England squad for first Test against India announced

England, who are placed fifth in the ICC Test ranking, begin their series against top-ranked India on 1 August at Edgbaston, following the hosts’ victory in the limited-overs series.

Things haven’t been easy for England in the longest format of the game – after a winter without a win, they were stunned by Pakistan at Lord’s, before producing a fine performance at Headingley to draw the series.

The squad for the first Test against India was announced on Thursday by England National Cricket Selectors.

Adil Rashid returns to the squad for the first time since he played in the fifth Test against India at Chennai in December 2016. The leg-spinner has been in fine form in ODIs this summer taking 20 wickets at an average of 23.95 in England’s series victories over Australia and India.

If selected, Rashid, who signed a white-ball only deal with Yorkshire in February, will play his first Test in England having earned his previous 10 away from home.

adil-rashid-england-test

Seam bowler Jamie Porter earns his first call-up to the Test squad after impressing for Essex and the England Lions over past few seasons. The 25-year-old was named the Specsavers County Championship Player of the Year in 2017 and was instrumental in Essex lifting their first County Championship title since 1992.

Moeen Ali has returned to the squad for the first time since the tour of New Zealand.

The selection panel also confirmed that Chris Woakes requires more time to regain his form after recovering from his recent thigh and knee injury.

England squad for first Test

Joe Root (c), Moeen Ali, James Anderson, Jonny Bairstow (wk), Stuart Broad, Jos Buttler, Alastair Cook, Sam Curran, Keaton Jennings, Dawid Malan, Jamie Porter, Adil Rashid, Ben Stokes



from Blog – CricketTrolls.com https://ift.tt/2mPMBg1

Virat Kohli presented International Player of the Year award by Barmy Army

Team India captain Virat Kohli was presented with the International Player of the Year award for 2017-2018 by England’s Barmy Army as India concluded Day 1 of the practice match against Essex on Wednesday.

Barmy Army is a popular fan club of England cricket supporters who had last year shared a video of Kohli.

The fan club this year went ahead and presented him with the award. The BCCI, on its Twitter account, has shared the picture of the Indian skipper holding the award and said, “The @TheBarmyArmy presents #TeamIndia Captain @imVkohli with the International Player of the Year for years 2017 and 2018.”

In 2018, Kohli played a total of 19 matches across all formats and has scored 1181 runs with an average of 65.61. He has scored four hundreds and four half-centuries.

Earlier this year, Kohli had a sensational tour of South Africa, where he scored 871 runs across formats. In the ODIs, he scored 558 runs including three hundreds.

He was then once again among the runs in the three-match ODI series in England – Kohli made a fluent 75 in the first match which India won at Old Trafford before scoring 45 in the second ODI at Lord’s.

During the third ODI, Kohli became the fastest to 3000 ODI runs as captain, taking just 49 innings to get to the mark.

Incidentally, Kohli was also the fastest to 1000 and 2000 ODI runs as captain.

Last year, when Barmy Army had honoured him with the award, Kohli had thanked them on a video saying being recognized by a group as passionate as they felt great.

“I am really honoured to be chosen by the Barmy Army as the international player of the year. It feels nice to be recognised by the fans of other countries and cricket lovers from all over the globe which makes you feel great as a cricketer. Specially from the Barmy Army who made my life hell in England in 2014 when I had a tough time.

“They always support their team very passionately and I am sure it will be a challenge when we go to England. But to have received such an honour from them makes me feel proud of playing for my nation. I want to thank you all once again from the bottom of my heart and look forward to catching up with all of you when we come to England next year. Hopefully, we can have some interaction of the field also, cheers thank you,” Kohli said.



from Blog – CricketTrolls.com https://ift.tt/2JTnIsB

Wednesday, July 25, 2018

Here’s why no WAGs allowed to meet Team India players till end of third Test against England

Photos: Rohit Sharma holidaying with wife Ritika in England

Asia Cup 2018 schedule announced

Defending champions India will take on arch-rivals Pakistan in a group stage match of the Asia Cup 2018 on September 19 in Dubai.

India will open their campaign against a Qualifier on 18 September, the ICC announced on Tuesday.

India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Afghanistan are the confirmed participants while the remaining two spots are up for grabs and will see UAE, Singapore, Oman, Nepal, Malaysia and Hong Kong fight for them.

Group A will have India, Pakistan and the qualifier while Group B will consist of Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Afghanistan.

Asia Cup

The opening game will be played between Bangladesh and Sri Lanka on September 15 in Dubai and the final will take place on September 28.

The top two teams from each group will qualify for the Super Four, which is a round robin format, from where two teams will then play the final in Dubai.

Asia Cup schedule:

Group Stage

  • 15 September – Bangladesh vs Sri Lanka (Dubai)
  • 16 September – Pakistan vs Qualifier (Dubai)
  • 17 September – Sri Lanka vs Afghanistan (Abu Dhabi)
  • 18 September – India vs Qualifier (Dubai)
  • 19 September – India vs Pakistan (Dubai)
  • 20 September – Bangladesh vs Afghanistan (Abu Dhabi)

Super Four

  • 21 September – Group A Winner vs Group B Runner-up (Dubai)
  • 21 September – Group B Winner vs Group A Runner-up (Abu Dhabi)
  • 23 September – Group A Winner vs Group A Runner-up (Dubai)
  • 23 September – Group B Winner vs Group B Runner-up (Abu Dhabi)
  • 25 September – Group A Winner vs Group B Winner (Dubai)
  • 26 September – Group A Runner-up vs Group B Runner-up (Abu Dhabi)

Final

  • 28 September (Dubai)


from Blog – CricketTrolls.com https://ift.tt/2LNrm9f

Tuesday, July 24, 2018

Scotland shaping up for full ICC membership

It is looking most likely that Scotland will be the next country to step up and take full membership of the ICC (International Cricket Council); this according to Malcolm Cannon, the Chief Executive Officer Cricket Scotland.

The Saltires (nicknamed after the blue Saint Andrews Cross insignia) would, if their application is successful, have more guaranteed top cricket matches to look forward to; matches against the likes of Australia, England, India, Pakistan and South Africa.

With Ireland and Afghanistan becoming full members last year, the total full membership roster numbers 12 countries. The other ten are: Australia, Bangladesh, England, India, New Zealand, Pakistan, South Africa, Sri Lanka, West Indies and Zimbabwe.

The rest of the membership of the ICC is made up of 93 countries, each with associate membership status. The USA, the Falklands and Nepal, are under suspension of membership at this point in time.

Currently, The Scots hold associate membership, but there can be little doubt, that Scottish cricket is in the ascendancy. In the past 13-months, The Saltires have beaten four out of the 12 full members of the ICC, including England of course. Who would have bet on that?

Scotland also came incredibly close to gaining qualification for the World Cup, and they beat Holland and Ireland in the Twenty20 tri-series.

But getting good results alone is not necessarily enough to gain a full membership slot. According to Malcolm Cannon, even getting full members to agree to play the Scots is challenging.

In addition, there is also all of the work that goes into planning and organising. It all has to be taken into consideration said, Cannon. He went on to say that the Scottish cricket organisation had worked solidly for one year to fully organise their three summer games this year – one against England, and two T20s against Pakistan.

But at the end of the day, Scottish cricket knows what they have to do to be ready for full membership of the ICC, and they have total confidence in their ability to meet the criteria. All they have to do says Cannon, is to continue doing what they have been doing and working at the same rate they have adopted in the past 12-months.

But achieving full membership status is not just about hard work – it requires money. However, if they can achieve their goal, and the signs are favourable, it would be a game-changing event for cricket in Scotland.

Scotland’s progression in recent months has been admirable – on the field of play as well as off.

Both men’s and women’s cricket, their performance pathway and the management and leadership of the cricket organisation have all improved. The infrastructure and the financial backbone have also made giant steps forward.

As Cannon summed it up, Scotland has completely changed its cricket ethos in every way, and all for the better. He maintains that they are now acting as full members act, and that if they continue to do so in the coming months, the ICC board will have no choice other than to elect Scotland as full members in recognition.

Attaining full membership would also pave the way for Scotland being able to join in the test cricket scene. However, the CEO did qualify this ambition by saying that at the moment, full membership and test cricket must remain two separate issue. But that’s okay. It is not mandatory for full ICC members to have to play test cricket.

From Scotland’s point of view, they first have to discuss the scenario and what the implications would be in terms of the Saltires ability and whether or not they have suitable grounds or could build new grounds. It is a big step to take and one which Ireland have found tough.

One thing at a time and full ICC membership is the short-term goal.



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/2OhozHc

Team India bus driver recalls Suresh Raina’s kind gesture when his wife was ill

Indian cricket team bus driver on the England tour, Jeff Goodwin recently revealed that he will never forget Suresh Raina’s kind gesture a few years ago when his wife was ill.

“This team is the best. Raina, a few years ago in Leeds, gave me his shirt to auction when my wife was ill. I will never forget that,” Goodwin was quoted as saying while speaking to bcci.tv.

“Mr. Kohli sits in front and this gentleman here (pointing towards Chahal) calls me an old man,” said Goodwin. To which, Chahal replied from the back, “Because you are.”

Virat Kohli & Co. will play their first Test at Edgbaston on August 1, and Goodwin also told that the current crop of Indian cricketers are very friendly.

“I like the lads, they are all friendly. They are great to get on with. In my times, the Australians would be drinking all the time after the game and staying inside the changing room till 2 am in the morning but now, not as much,” he added.

Goodwin also revealed how because of Darren Lehmann, he got the nickname Popeye and now even has a tattoo of the same.

“In 2004, when I was driving Australia, Darren Lehmann was then making drinks and he was a player then and he says ‘You…we like you. We will give you a nickname and he was telling me all the players’ nicknames and after a few days, he went, you are Popeye and everybody calls me Popeye and I’ve even got a tattoo of Popeye now,” Goodwin concluded.



from Blog – CricketTrolls.com https://ift.tt/2A6qzyQ

Thursday, July 19, 2018

Team India squad for first 3 Tests against England announced

The Board of Control for Cricket in India’s (BCCI) senior selection committee has picked the Indian squad for the first three matches of the upcoming five-Test series against England.

After the limited over series, Team India will be going into the longest format of the game with two wicket-keepers as selectors have included young Rishabh Pant alongside senior wicket-keeper batsman Dinesh Karthik.

India will miss the services of their main wicket-keeper Wriddhiman Saha, who is still recuperating the thumb injury he suffered during the IPL 2018.

Mohammed Shami, who was dropped from the Afghanistan game in Bengaluru after failing the Yo-Yo test, has made his way back.

Apart from Pant, chinaman bowler Kuldeep Yadav has also been included in the Test squad.

BCCI’s statement on Bhuvneshwar Kumar and Jasprit Bumrah:

“Bhuvneshwar Kumar aggravated a lower back condition in the 3rd ODI against England. His condition is being assessed by the BCCI medical team and a call on his inclusion in the Test squad will be made soon.”

“Jasprit Bumrah who has been included in the squad, will be available for selection from the 2nd Test onwards based on his fitness.”

India’s squad (first 3 Tests):

Virat Kohli (c), Shikhar Dhawan, KL Rahul, M Vijay, Cheteshwar Pujara, Ajinkya Rahane (vc), Karun Nair, Dinesh Karthik (wk), Rishabh Pant (wk), Ravichandran Ashwin, Ravindra Jadeja, Kuldeep Yadav, Hardik Pandya, Ishant Sharma, Mohammed Shami, Umesh Yadav, Jasprit Bumrah, Shardul Thakur.



from Blog – CricketTrolls.com https://ift.tt/2LdvBio

Vijay Hazare – The Wall Before Dravid

The two finest batsmen of the first era of Indian Test cricket share a Christian name, Vijay, and almost a Test average. The great Merchant averaged 47.72 in his ten Tests, the great Hazare 47.65 from three times as many. There weren’t too many similarities in their backgrounds however. Merchant came from a wealthy Hindu family. The Hazares on the other hand were Christians, and Hazare’s father a teacher rather than, as in Merchant’s case, a textile magnate.

The young Hazare was also a good footballer, a skilful winger. As such he came to the notice of the Yuvaraj of Dewas who offered him accommodation and financial assistance that allowed him to remain at school and gave him every opportunity to play sport.

The first major cricket match that Hazare played was for Poona against Douglas Jardine’s 1933/34 MCC tourists. The match was not First Class, and the first of the scheduled two days was rained off. When play did get under way on the second morning it was with the ball rather than the bat that Hazare made an impression. He took four of the five MCC wickets to fall before scratching around for four in Poona’s response. He was one of eight victims for the Yorkshire slow left arm bowler Hedley Verity, a bowler in a different class to anything Hazare had faced before.

For the next few years Hazare’s progress was unspectacular, but the Yuvaraj, now the Maharajah, kept his faith in him. He was clearly moving forward though, as he was selected to play for India in three of the five matches played against a strong side raised by Lionel Tennyson in 1937/38. His highest score was only 31, but then he was batting at nine.

In 1938 the Maharaja’s patronage took Hazare to England on a tour by what was described as a Rajputana side. There was a century against Cambridge University that was looked on with approval by the English press, and Hazare also had an opportunity to watch the touring Australians play before the tour ended in near farce, the manager running out of money and struggling to scrape together sufficient funds to get the party home on a cargo vessel.

The real turning point in Hazare’s career came when he got back from England. The Maharajah’s brother in law, the Raja of Jath was a keen cricketer. He was a wrist spinner and wanted to learn to bowl the googly so, as only an Indian Prince could, he made arrangements for Clarrie Grimmett to come and coach him and he asked Dewas, who readily agreed, to allow Hazare to join him. Grimmett was paid a fee of £2,000, the equivalent of around £125,000 in today’s terms, and in addition all his expenses were met. As well as being one of the best wrist spinners the game has seen Grimmett was also a fine coach, who published as many as three instructional books between 1930 and 1949.

Hazare was a serviceable medium paced off spinner who during his career took almost 600 wickets at less than 25 runs each. Grimmett taught him how to produce a finger spun leg break, but also realised he was never going to be a top class bowler and prioritised encouraging the batting talent he saw. As a result of Grimmett’s coaching Hazare ended up as a very fine player of leg spin, and the 1939/40 season saw a spectacular rise in his fortunes.

There is not a great deal of footage of Hazare batting around, so there is a good deal to be gained from reading the descriptions of those who did get to see his many long innings. The impression is given that Hazare, a slim and wiry man, was much like an early version of Rahul Dravid. Apparently slow and painstaking in his approach he certainly eschewed the spectacular, but as he himself would point out there were three occasions on which he scored a century before lunch. That is not to suggest that Hazare was anything other than modest in the extreme.

As Grimmett was dealing with a man who had already a distinctly unorthodox approach to batting he decided not to make any fundamental changes, preferring to make minor adjustments to accommodate the eccentricities. Thus the unusually large distance between the top hand and bottom hand remained, as did the bat being grounded between the feet, preventing its being readily moved straight backwards or forwards. The number of runs that Hazare scored were testament to the wisdom of Grimmett’s decisions.

Hazare’s average for the 1939/40 season was 139.40. The highlight was an unbeaten 316 for Maharashtra against Baroda, the first triple century by an Indian batsman. In India First Class cricket carried on during the war and over the next three seasons Hazare averaged 87, 52 and 94. Then in 1943/44 he exceeded even his remarkable efforts of four years previously when his mark was 177.87.

The most remarkable feat of that summer came in the Pentangular Tournament. The competition was held annually in Bombay (Mumbai) for many years but ended just after the war. With independence in the air the format was, understandably, considered divisive and inappropriate. As the name suggests by the end there were five competing sides; Muslims, Hindus, Europeans, Parsees and the Rest.

In the 1943 semi-final Hazare was the only future Test player in the Rest’s side. The Muslims were rather stronger, five of their number going on to play Test cricket. Although limited to three days these games had a tendency to become attritional as a victory on first innings was sufficient to progress to the final. The Muslims batted first and scored 353. The Rest dug in and when they were finally dismissed, half way through the final day, they had scored 395. Hazare had batted for seven and a half hours for 248, the highest score ever recorded in the tournament.

The Hindu side that opposed the Rest in the final was an immensely strong one. Led by Vijay Merchant the eleven also included Vinoo Mankad and only one of them did not at any point play Test cricket. The Hindus piled up 581-5 before declaring, Hazare doing the lion’s share of the bowling. His final figures were 51-8-109-3 but his batting record had lasted less than a week, Merchant being unbeaten on 250 when he closed the innings. The Rest were quickly dismissed for just 133 Hazare, top scoring with 59, being one of only two men to halt the procession for any length of time. When the rest slipped to 60-5 in their second innings it seemed as if three of the four scheduled days would be sufficient.

It was at this point that Hazare was joined by his brother Vivek, four years his junior. An all-rounder, Vivek played the First Class game for more than twenty years, but his career never took off. In December 1943 however he stayed with his illustrious brother for five and a half hours. The pair added exactly 300 before Vivek was dismissed. In an innings of intense concentration he had scored just 21 in the time it had taken Vijay to score 266. After his brother’s dismissal Vijay was unable to prevent an innings defeat but he moved on to 309 before being the last man dismissed with the score on 387. He had scored 79.84% of his team’s runs.

When the rest of the world resumed First Class cricket after the war India were England’s first visitors, in the summer of 1946. Hazare was a certainty for selection and at 31 finally made his Test debut. In unfamiliar conditions and a wet summer it was no surprise when Hazare failed to fully demonstrate his prowess in England, although an unbeaten 244 against Yorkshire meant his overall average was just a fraction under 50. In the three Tests he disappointed. The first, won by England by ten wickets saw him make two starts, 31 and 34, before being beaten each time by Alec Bedser. In the first innings he had looked comfortable enough until the great medium pacer bowled him with a sharp off break. In the second innings, playing for the same delivery but not receiving it, he edged to slip. England should have won the second Test as well, but India’s last pair hung on at a damp Old Trafford. Hazare top scored with 44 in the second innings and, oddly given the rearguard action he was engaged in, hit the only six of his Test career. The final Test was ruined by rain.

The next two series for Hazare came in Australia in 1947/48 and at home against West Indies the following year. India lost 4-0 in Australia. Hazare did not fail at all, but seven times having got into double figures he failed to get to twenty. His remaining three innings were much better. In the fourth Test at Adelaide he became the first Indian batsman to score a century in each innings. He played superbly to blunt the threat of Ray Lindwall and Keith Miller although it was not sufficient to prevent India losing by an innings. He added 74 in the first innings of the final Test. At home against West Indies Hazare scored two centuries and three fifties but he could not prevent West Indies’ 1-0 series win, the Indians’ main difficulty being bowling the opposition out.

Still employed by the Maharajah Hazare had some misgivings about accepting an offer of a contract with Rawtenstall in the Lancashire League for the English summer of 1949. His benevolent master was however happy to see his finest cricketer take five months holiday in order to boost his experience of English conditions. Hazare helped propel the side to the runners up position, and did the double, an exceptional feat in Saturday afternoon cricket. Only the Australian Cec Pepper matched him. It was the first of four summers in the leagues. In 1950 and 1951 he played for Royton in the Central Lancashire League before returning to Rawtenstall in 1955.

A very strong collection of league professionals travelled back to India with Hazare for the 1949/50 season. They were led by Frank Worrell and were styled as a Commonwealth XI and five matches against India had all the trappings of Tests. Hazare was the Indians’ best batsman by a distance, scoring 684 runs at 97.71 in their 2-1 victory. A similar side toured again the following year again under Worrell. If anything a stronger combination this one was successful, winning 2-0. Hazare was slightly less effective, but still scored 634 runs at 79.25.

The next official Tests for Hazare and India were back to back series against England. There were five Tests to play at home in 1951/52 and then four in England in the summer of 1952. The opposition on each occasion was very different. In India England were led by Lancashire’s Nigel Howard, who never got close to selection again. Amongst the names missing were Hutton, Compton, Edrich, Evans, Laker, Bedser and Washbrook. In the circumstances England did pretty well to share the series 1-1. For Hazare the series was a slight disappointment, as he averaged a mere 57.83. He started well enough, an unbeaten 164 in the first Test followed by 155 in the second, both drawn, but he achieved little in the remaining three, and indeed was dismissed for a pair in the Englishmen’s victory in the fourth Test.

The series against England saw Hazare given the Indian captaincy, a job which his innately cautious and modest approach might not have made him ideally suited for. Writer Dom Moraes who, as a thirteen year old wrote an acclaimed cricket book, Green is the Grass, produced an interesting description of Hazare the man; Hazare is the man who smiles shyly and keeps discreetly to a corner in pavilion gatherings; the man who hurries away if he hears himself being praised; the man who keeps himself in the rear, until he is crouched over his bat, his lips lifting with the beginning of a snarl, as he comes down on some bowler’s special, and pushes it down to short leg.

The big guns of English cricket were back for the return series, but it was a new name who left the greatest impression on the Indians. A young National Serviceman, Aircraftman Frederick Sewards Trueman, was released to play in all four Tests and took 29 wickets at 13.31. The searing pace of Trueman was simply too much for the Indian batsmen and had the tour management not managed to persuade Vinoo Mankad’s employers, Haslingden of the Lancashire League, to release him for three of the Tests Hazare’s would have been a lone hand.

One accusation that could never be thrown at Hazare was that he lacked courage. Time and again in 1952 he was alone in standing up to Trueman, and while a number of his teammates were backing away towards square leg Hazare showed the Yorkshire tyro the full face of his broad bat. In the first Test innings of 89 and 56, the latter made after India had slumped to 0-4, helped make the scorecard look respectable, and 69* and 49 at Lord’s, alongside a monumental innings from Mankad, took the match into a fifth day.

Amidst the carnage of India’s dismissals for 58 and 82 at Old Trafford Hazare stood firm for an hour in each innings for 16, but reserved his best effort for the fourth and last Test at the Oval. The 38 he top scored with in the Indian innings of 98 was the difference between a draw and defeat even though almost two thirds of the playing time was lost. At one point in the innings five Indian wickets had fallen with just six runs on the board. Raju Bharatan wrote; Hazare’s innings will go down as the most courageous ever played by an Indian. He literally rescued India from a snake pit. The wicket for a time behaved in the most wicked fashion imaginable with the ball lifting almost vertically from the good length spot.

Just weeks after returning from England India played host to neighbours Pakistan for the new Test nation’s inaugural series. In his autobiography Hazare wrote of being deposed from the captaincy, but seems not to have been unduly troubled by the appointment of Lala Amarnath in his place. Hazare’s continued importance was demonstrated by his 76 in the first Test and an unbeaten 146 in the third, the two that India won. When he missed the second Test through illness Fazal Mahmmod ran through the Indian batting twice and Pakistan won.

Despite leading India to their first ever series win Amarnath in turn was removed as captain for India’s fourth series in 18 months, in the Caribbean in early 1953. The job came back to Hazare, who felt obliged to miss the final Test against Pakistan in order to ready himself for the West Indies trip. His  final Test series proved disappointing in that India lost the only match to reach a conclusion, but the Indians emerged with considerable credit in drawing four times, without too many alarms, against a side that had comfortably beaten England in England less than three years previously. With the bat Hazare made just a single half century, and averaged only 19.40. He did however thoroughly enjoy the tour which, at the age of 38, was his last as an active cricketer.

The 1953/54 season represented the 25th anniversary of the Indian Board of Control and to celebrate a third Commonwealth Tour was arranged, this time a side led by Ben Barnett, the 1938 Australian Test wicketkeeper who had settled in England after the War. The side was not as strong as its predecessors to start with, and the constantly shifting personnel (twenty different men played at various times) must have made it difficult to built up much team spirit. Again there were five ‘Test’ matches of which India won two to the Commonwealth’s one. Hazare, back in the ranks as India had a look at as many as four possible skippers for the future, played in the first three matches without great success, so his country did at least learn that they could win without him.

Hazare did carry on playing the game at First Class level after leaving Test cricket and the Indian fans certainly never forgot him. In 1956/57 an Australian side, fresh from being well and truly Lakered in England, played three Tests in India on their way home. The Australians won the first Test by an innings and were well on top in the second, drawn encounter. They won the third too, but not before the public in Calcutta mounted a campaign to have Hazare selected for the match. Sadly for them Hazare was a long way from Calcutta, and had no wish to come out of retirement anyway, but the show of loyalty did persuade him to visit the city in December where innings of 21 and 60 helped a Bengal Chief Minister’s XI beat a strong visiting side that had been raised by Lancashire secretary Geoffrey Howard. He also started well in the tourists other match, at the Brabourne Stadium in Bombay but was forced to retire hurt on 32 when struck on the finger by Trueman. The injury turned out to be a fracture, the fact it was his first ever such injury being testament to his skill with the bat.

In 1957/58 Baroda won the Ranji Trophy and Hazare rolled back the years. He scored 781 runs at 78.10 and there were three centuries including 203 in the final against Services. For three more seasons there were occasional Ranji appearances and, as late as January 1967, one final First Class match for a Board President’s XI against West Indies at Nagpur. The 51 year old scored 21 and 68 against an attack that included Wes Hall and Charlie Griffith. The game was a benefit for Hazare and the two great fast bowlers did not bowl very much, but it seems unlikely that Hazare’s own description of his performance as somewhat lucky is entirely fair.

In 1959/60 Hazare had become a selector and in the Republic Day Honours List in 1960 he was awarded a Padma Shri, although his own writings suggest the award he valued most was subsequently being made an honorary member of the MCC. He lived a long life seeing in a new century as one of the enduring legends of the Indian game. Vijay Hazare was 89 when he died in 2004.

 

 

 

 

 

 



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/2Laquzd

Thursday, July 12, 2018

Alastair Cook: Is he approaching the end of the road in Test cricket?

Alastair Cook
“Alastair Cook” by Global Panorama (CC BY-SA 2.0)

The summer of 2018 looks like being a make-or-break period for England’s longest-serving test batsman, Alastair Cook. The former skipper has endured a torrid time with the bat in recent series, with a string of disappointing performances against New Zealand in the winter. Cook’s inconsistencies have led to more questions from the press as to whether the Essex ace has the drive to keep going at the pinnacle of the game.

Most cricket fans would be surprised to know that Cook is aged just 33 years old, having made his Test debut against India back in 2006. Some 12 years later, it’s somewhat poetic that Cook prepares to come face-to-face with the Indians once again on English soil. However, the fact that the ECB has opted to name Cook in the England Lions side to face India A prior to England’s five-Test series with India suggests that the board of selectors are still unsure as to whether Cook has a future at the top of the English batting order. After England’s recent 2-1 T20 series loss to India, the latest cricket odds still make England 8/11 favourites to defeat India in their first Test at Lord’s.

The facts and figures certainly don’t look great for Cook in the short-term. Although he has scored well over 12,000 Test runs at an average of more than 46 in his career, Cook managed just 376 runs in nine innings in England’s latest Ashes drubbing in Australia; six of which were scores under 20 runs. Worse still, Cook averaged just three runs on tour in New Zealand, with Kiwi bowler Trent Boult having a field day against the left-hander during their brief series.

Feast or famine would be the best way to describe Cook’s form in recent years. In 2017, he averaged over 47 runs per game. However, if you remove the double-hundreds he scored against the West Indies in August and Australia in December, that leaves just 412 runs scored in his remaining innings at an average of only 22.88. The one target that may just keep Cook motivated and firing at the top of the order is the prospect of climbing the all-time highest Test run scorer rankings. Cook is currently sixth on the all-time list, just 372 runs behind Sri Lankan icon, Kumar Sangakkara and only 1,250 runs behind second-placed Aussie, Ricky Pointing. Two more successful years at the top of the game could see Cook cemented as the second-highest run scorer in Test history behind the all-time great Sachin Tendulkar.

2017.11.24.14.33.30-Day 1, 1st Test AUS v ENG
“2017.11.24.14.33.30-Day 1, 1st Test AUS v ENG” by David Molloy (CC BY 2.0)

England’s lack of opening batsmen is another reason why Cook may just have a stay of execution this summer against India. Mark Stoneman is slowly beginning to carve a niche at number-two, averaging just over 30 after two half-centuries against New Zealand, but there is only Keaton Jennings, who recently got a call-up against Pakistan, and a number of rookies to choose from beyond him. Even Cook must know himself that he is in the last-chance saloon. It may even be Cook’s idea to play for the Lions against India A and earn himself some much-needed time in the middle.

Last summer opening bowler James Anderson faced similar questions as to how long the 34-year-old Lancastrian could continue in Test cricket. He answered his critics with his most successful Test summer, bagging 39 wickets in the process. Can Cook follow suit and extend his time at the top of the England order? Only time will tell.



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/2JjOb2m