Thursday, August 19, 2021

Introduction to Cricket Betting & The Markets Within It

If you’re looking to bet on cricket, this blog post is for you! We’ll explain how the market works and give you some pointers on what to look out for in addition to recommending some cricket betting sites. Cricket betting is a unique form of wagering because it’s not just about the team that wins or loses but also about how many runs are scored in each inning. This can make things tricky so we’ve compiled a list of tips below.

What’s more, there are plenty of other types of bets you can place while watching live cricket games including predicting who will be named man-of-the-match at the end as well as guessing which team will score first. Read on to find out more!

These days, betting on cricket is bigger than ever. It’s such a popular sport that they even offer bets for its many formats: Tests, One Day Internationals (ODIs), and T20 games. But which one should you bet on? Here are the most popular types of markets to choose from when placing your wagers!

Leading Wicket Taker & Leading Run Scorer

We all know how lucrative batting in the RBI positions can be, but did you realize that betting on a team’s top 3 batters is even more profitable? Plus, when looking at series outcomes and individual match totals for wicket-takers, better to punt.

Series Winner & Match Outcome

A team’s batting order can be a massively profitable bet. If you are able to place your bets on the player who has been scoring at the top of their lineup, such as three or four positions up from bottom, then this is likely going to pay off for you in high dividends. It also pays that much more if they are leading scorer and with every series won or lost it makes even clearer why it was smart betting on wicket-takers like bowlers early on so often during matches and innings.

Highest Opening Partnership

A great way to increase your chances of winning is by researching the individual batsmen who play for the opposing team, and see how they fare against a specific bowler. This will give you an idea on what kind of strategy would be best suited for that particular game–whether it’s with offspinners or left-handers. This coupled with the betting partner when pitted against the opening bowlers will allow you to hopefully find a betting market which offers the greatest value & highest likelihood of a return.

A great example was England vs New Zealand in 2015: Kane Williamson had one hundred percent success when facing spin bowlers from his own team (that means he hit every ball). The other guys fared less well so if there are any outlying statistics like this before playing them then make sure you know about them first!

Final Thoughts

The venue has a major impact on how the player plays and what equipment they want to use. Home teams are statistically better than away ones, which is why home field advantage exists in their favour when playing with loyal fans cheering them on every step of the way.

Researching individual players and teams can help you make smarter bets. For example, do the batters perform better on hard or soft ground? Some of these games may even end in a draw instead of playing until there is one team left standing because it’s impossible to win. It’s also important to select the sports betting site for your needs. For exampe, in the UK you may stick with the big boys like Ladbrokes, Skybet, and Paddy Power. However, if you’re looking for online betting in China it could be worth looking at review sites such as AllVideoSlots before making any decisions.



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/3ARdO5R

Tuesday, August 17, 2021

Is English cricket set for a decade of decline?

Depressingly, the only thing that stopped India from winning the first Test at Trent Bridge was the Nottingham rain. The truth is, however, if this English summer wasn’t doing everything it could to impersonate the unsettled winter months, then England would be going into the second Test at Lord’s 1-0 down.

Indeed, at no point did Chris Silverwood’s team look like winning and the verdict of the pundits seemingly reflected the precarious situation for England throughout the five days. That being said, there’s three more Tests to go and the cricket betting live odds have England at drifting prices of 17/10 to be declared the outright winners. Even though Virat Kohli’s men were held to a draw, you do feel it’s just a matter of time before India take a lead in this five-Test series given the mounting problems that the Three Lions have to deal with. In fact, the cricket tips for the remainder of the series predict that a break in the weather will eventually come and India will manage to beat England.

It should be said that this is a popular view shared by most cricket enthusiasts. Simply put, there’s just too much to fix within this English Test team in time to pull off a miraculous win against India this summer. The Telegraph probably put it best when they said England had ‘batting problems that would see the recall of parliament if they were a political crisis.’ If you needed any further proof of this then just consider for a second that Dom Sibley batted for over five hours at Trent Bridge and only mustered a total of 46 runs in the match. The top order, barring Joe Root, have quite literally frozen and are unable to find a way to get out of first gear. Calamity is the only likely outcome when the confidence of a batting lineup is in such short supply, like it is with England, as the opposition pin the batsmen down and pick them off at will. Alarmingly, there are also problems in the bowling department that run extremely deep too. At 39 and 35 respectively, James Anderson and Stuart Broad are on their last legs, and given that the ECB’s attention has been focused on making the Hundred a success over the last 12 months, it’s not hard to figure out why the next generation hasn’t been blooded yet. Regrettably, there’s been a desperate lack of foresight amongst England’s think-tank and the future is looking anything but promising. And then, of course, there’s also been some downright bad luck with a long-term injury to Jofra Archer that will rule him out of the T20 World Cup and crucially, the Ashes in Australia at the end of the year.

England will be desperate for Ben Stokes to make himself available for selection again in time for the Ashes after taking an indefinite break from cricket but, then again, that won’t help the Test team here and now. Indeed, it’s all hands to the pump for the Three Lions but the personnel they have trying to assist will sadly only ensure that a summer of trouble and defeat lies ahead for England.



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/3yZZxTG

Ranking System Outlook

In the late 90s and early 2000s, the home and away dominance of one cricket team was comparable to the American superhuman soldier John Rambo in Rambo III who stood up against the atheistic ‘commie’ infidels and supported the Afghan Mujahideen. In 2021, while it looks like “Rambo’s” democratic intervention against Soviet excesses (with their draconian and outdated ideology which imposed regressive diktats like giving education and equal rights to women) didn’t end so well, the Australian cricket team remains a strong team in the world arena.

But there is a difference between the ‘Rambo’ days of Australian cricket and the present.

First, is the lack of international trophies in their cabinet, even as they enviously look at the World Test Championship mace securely held across the Tasman (Unconfirmed news reports suggest that the New Zealand Parliament has voted for the mace to be protected in a top-secret vault against possible threats from mischievous elements). Second, unlike the Australians of the past who would walk into unchartered territory (West Indies 1995, India 2004) and conquer them after dominating the proceedings, the Australians of the present find it tough away from home.

The ‘away’ record is an important element of Test cricket, especially given its relative lack of ‘world’ trophies as compared to other formats. Domination at home is easier to achieve, however, it is away from home where the real strengths are tested. If a team is to be called world-class, it should be good across conditions.

At present, there are teams that possess the arsenal to challenge all teams when they tour (Australia, India, England, and New Zealand), however, there is not one team that can lay a claim to having achieved dominance across the globe.

The Test match playing nations can be divided into four rough groupings: The top teams which have been mentioned above, The middle sides (Pakistan, South Africa) which have the potential and structure to challenge all teams but are being kept back by one reason or the other, The strugglers (West Indies, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh) who have faced many crises in recent times which has reflected in their cricketing fortunes and the bottom three (Zimbabwe, Afghanistan, and Ireland) comprising of newer nations or those which have suffered long-term troubles.

It is a given that the teams from the first two groups would dominate at home against sides from the other groupings. (Though there are upsets, such as Sri Lankan victory over South Africa in 2019)

More factors come into play away from home, in conditions which aren’t best suited to the tourists. Then there are circumstances peculiar to a team such as England, who haven’t been the strongest at home or away, but can always spring a surprise (victories over Sri Lanka away from home) or India, who have found the going good in Asia, Africa, Australia, and West Indies but haven’t touched quite the same form in England and New Zealand.

Having stated the above, the question that comes to mind in the context of World Test Championship encounters is, should ‘away’ contests be given greater importance than ‘home’ encounters? This isn’t something novel or revolutionary. That ancient war ritual turned sport, Football, uses an ‘away goal’ rule. Even Virat Kohli has suggested double points for away wins in the past.

For some of the ‘Top’ sides, it probably doesn’t matter much, but for the lower-ranked teams, it can make a world of a difference. For example, if the West Indies play to the best of their skills to beat South Africa (whom they have beaten only once away from home) in South Africa, shouldn’t that win count more than home victories? The players and fans would definitely treat it as a special win, how about the WTC points table reflecting the importance of this win.

The linking of an increase in WTC points for away encounters can also make for more exciting cricket, with teams prioritizing away success and thus, ensuring that they aren’t one-trick ponies.

At the same time, the administrators could also explore the possibility of a scaled points system, wherein, a lower ranked side gets a ‘bonus’ or extra points for their win over high-ranked sides. Of course, to use this in the WTC itself would be an attack of the egalitarian principles of the cricketing community.

How about using these bonus points for setting up the next WTC schedule? If Sri Lanka beat India, Australia, and New Zealand in a particular WTC cycle, they deserve more series against higher-ranked teams in the next cycle. This ‘bonus’ points system could be solely allocated to teams below a particular ranking (say 4) in the ICC Test rankings. Obviously, an away win here too would garner more points to the team.

Such a system could be eventually evolved to also serve the teams which at present aren’t a part of the WTC cycle. If a side like Ireland can consistently challenges the likes of Bangladesh, West Indies, Pakistan, etc. then it can be promoted to be a part of the WTC cycle. Thus, there can be an added incentive behind every game of Test cricket.



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/37QGiQI

Thursday, August 12, 2021

Australian Odyssey: Greg Chappell and the 1980/81 Season

The low point in a long, hard season

 

Australia’s second dual home international summer in 1980/81 was a tumultuous one that set the scene for the upheaval that bedeviled the Australian team in the first half of that decade. The second Australian summer since the Packer realignment had irrevocably altered the country’s cricket schedules and saw tensions rise and players wilt under the new demands. Most prominent among these was the Australian captain himself, Greg Chappell, whose spectacular burnout reached its all too public peak under the full glare of a baking Melbourne sun in February 1981.

When Chappell decided the mind and body could take no more, he opted to skip the Ashes series in the 1981 English summer. The mythology of Botham’s Ashes also has an Australian side to the story, not least that of the man who would lead the Aussies in England, Kim Hughes. The preceding Australia summer of 1980-81 is the background to that England tour, how the Australians came to take the squad they did, and how competing factions would influence the outcome of an Ashes Test series which has long since entered English cricketing folk lore.

All this seemed some way off on the first day of September 1980 when the Centenary Test had just reached its conclusion. Following the drawn Test’s post-match ceremonials, BBC’s Peter West spoke to both captains on the Lord’s balcony.  Bearing the facial expression of a man contemplating imminent root canal surgery rather than a future tour as captain, Greg Chappell responded to West’s enthusiastic probing about a full 6 Test Ashes summer in 1981:

“We’re looking forward to it. Hopefully, God willing and everything else, I might be back again for another tour next year. But, you know, I’m playing each season by ear at the moment, so I see how I go in the Australian summer next year and worry about (The Ashes series) April, May next year”. At which point Peter West said “I think a player who might just accompany you is a man who has got the man of the match award” before summoning Kim Hughes over from his spot on the balcony. Chappell, almost lugubrious by that time, walked away with his English counterpart Ian Botham as Peter West focussed his attention on The Golden Boy himself. The juxtaposition of Chappell’s world-weariness with Hughes’ boyish exuberance in this post-match segment is filled with pathos given what we know of the fortunes of both men in the year that followed.

Botham, on the day of his reappointment as England captain for the upcoming winter tour to the Caribbean, was much more upbeat than Chappell, who looked both resigned and exhausted. The England captain’s comparative levity is striking when contrasted with Chappell, even though Botham had been through the wringer in a summer where he had experienced his first serious downturn in form as an international player during the series defeat against West Indies.

Chappell had good reason for his dark mood. Awaiting him on the return home for the 1980/81 season was a daunting schedule.  By the conclusion of the Australian summer, Chappell and his Australian side would have completed a passage in their careers in which a single 100-day period contained 80 days of cricket, many of which would include back-to-back limited overs games over weekends.

The composition of the Australian team for the 1980-81 season would take on, in part, a strangely early 1970s tint, with the return of one of Ian and Greg Chappell’s favourite larrikins. Having apparently signed off from international cricket at the conclusion of the 1977 Ashes series, Doug Walters came back into the fold for the 1980-81 home summer.  Nudging 36, he would put on hold his position as an executive for the company distributing Symonds cricket bats and don the Baggy Green once more. This time, though, he would cover his straggly, lank hair with helmet and visor while at the crease, giving him the appearance of an ageing village cricketer. There was nothing of the village slogger about his batting, though, as he ended the summer with 397 runs at 56.71, including a century against New Zealand in the final Test of the three-match rubber in Melbourne.

Alongside Walters, Lillee, Marsh, Pascoe and skipper Greg Chappell, were players who had become the Australian “establishment’ in the absence of those big boys who had played at night for Packer during 1977-78 and 1978-79.   John Dyson, Graeme Wood, Allan Border, Bruce Yardley and Rodney Hogg had all made their Test and ODI bows during the interregnum. Another, the incumbent vice-captain Kim Hughes, had begun his Test career on the last overseas tour before the split, the 1977 Ashes series in England. Together with Geoff Lawson, who debuted against New Zealand at Brisbane in the first half of the 1980-81 summer, the old and the new were uncomfortably welded together into the new, unified Australian team, a side led by a man who was increasingly wearying of the demands of his office.

The first red ball assignment of the season was a three-match Test series against New Zealand, which the Australians won comfortably by a 2-0 margin. Chappell’s men romped home by 10 wickets in the humidity of Brisbane in the 1st  Test. In a low scoring affair, where the Kiwis managed just 225 and 142, Lillee was at his best with a second innings 6-53. Moving westward for the 2nd Test in Perth, the New Zealand batting again looked feeble as they tumbled to 196 and then 121 in the second innings.  Lillee, Pascoe and Hogg had softened up the opposition batting, enabling Jim Higgs to take a second innings haul of 4-25 with his leg-spin. With the 3rd Test resulting in a draw, the Australians took the series with apparent comfort. On the final day, however, Geoff Howarth’s men shut up shop chasing 193 for victory and eventually closed on 128-6, thus saving themselves from a 3-0 series defeat.

With the World Series Cup running parallel alongside the Tests the schedule was already beginning to make its imprint on mind and limb. The ODI tri-nation season began on 23 November in Adelaide with the home side taking on New Zealand. This was followed up with Chappell’s team then taking a trip to Sydney for the game with India on 25 November.

With the 1st Test against New Zealand completed in three days on November 30, Australian bags were then packed for the trip back east to Melbourne for more white-ball fixtures on 6 & 7 December.  After Australia had beaten New Zealand by 4 wickets at the MCG in the second of those games on 7 December, they moved right across to the western edge of the continent for the 2nd Test match at Perth on 12 December. At this point of the season, however, the Australians were just about half-way through the demands of the international summer, with a three-Test series against the visiting Indians to come plus more one-dayers. Years later Chappell reflected on the upsurge in playing time demands which had followed the Packer schism:

The first season after WSC we were playing alternate Test matches against West Indies and England.  Bruce Laird had his hand broken against the West Indies and couldn’t play against England. We couldn’t understand why England would get the benefit of what West Indies had done. We were playing Test matches intertwined with one-day games, there was no flow to the season, adjusting from one format to another. We played all the double-headers in the one-day matches– Saturday and Sunday we were playing two days in a row. It was hard enough from the playing point of view but exceedingly demanding from a captaincy point of view. Two one-day games in a row were physically and mentally more demanding than a Test match. The workload on key players was immense, and towards the end of the season they were pretty much exhausted.”

After completing one Test series against New Zealand in Melbourne on 30 December the Australians began another against India in Sydney on 2 January. The home side won by an innings and 4 runs thanks to the captain’s sublime 204. Exhausted or not the old wafting punches and clips through the leg-side pervaded an innings in which 27 boundaries were struck. A 172-run partnership with Dougie Walters was a reminder of a time when the demands were not quite so onerous.

Once again, an attack consisting of Lillee, Pascoe, Hogg, and Jim Higgs proved too formidable for the visiting team. After the 1st Test there followed a three-week surfeit of one day cricket which resulted in both Australia and New Zealand qualifying for the World Series Cup finals. The 1st final was scheduled for 29 January in Sydney before which the Test series with India resumed for the second five-day game in Adelaide on 23 January.

The 2nd Test was noteworthy for Kim Hughes’ highest Test score: a sublime 213 which would silence the doubters, not least of which was Ian Chappell in the Channel 9 commentary box, who had suggested that Hughes’ future selection was in doubt. Following the conclusion of the Test match in Adelaide the focus would turn once more to the white ball format for a scheduled 5-match finals series. Already seething at the imposition of a quintet of games to decide the Benson & Hedges World Series Cup, Chappell was close to physical and mental collapse by the time that New Zealand won the first of the games on 29 January.

Despite pulling a game back and thrashing the Kiwis at Melbourne two days later, there came another the following day on 1 February, again at the MCG, which would strain Trans-Tasman relations to near breaking point.  Perhaps not since Bodyline in 1932/33 have events on a cricket field been so prominent in deciding relations between two countries.  In bald statistical terms Australia won the match and went 2-1 up in the final series. Statistics, though, cannot convey the turn of events that suffocating Melbourne afternoon.

In summary, the home side chalked up 235/4 batting first in conditions so hot that Trevor Chappell described them as a ‘bloody oven’. In reply, New Zealand arrived at the final ball of their allotted 50 overs on 229-8, effectively meaning that they could, at best, tie the game by striking the last ball of Trevor Chappell’s over for six.  Greg Chappell then instructed his younger brother to bowl the final ball underarm at Bruce McKechnie. To the clear disdain of the skipper’s old pal Rod Marsh behind the stumps – ‘no mate, no’ – Chappell the younger complied with the instructions of his elder brother, a man who had up to that point taken on a stature in Australian public life which was almost princely.

At the game’s end, following Bruce McKechnie’s hurled bat, the Australians tried to make immediate sanctuary in their dressing room. There followed a harangue from selector Sam Loxton before they even arrived there. So crushed was Loxton, who had just seen his old school values publicly soiled, that he burst into tears.  Loxton’s emotive eruption was largely confined to players and those in close proximity to the dressing room. The final verdict – and most damning – was delivered from the pulpit of Channel 9 that night by the Sage of Penrith himself, Richie Benaud, who delivered a headmasterly sermon, the target of which was Greg Chappell:

“I think it was a disgraceful performance from a captain who got his sums wrong today, and I think it should never be permitted to happen again. We keep reading and hearing that the players are under a lot of pressure, and that they’re tired and jaded and perhaps their judgment and skill is blunted. Perhaps they might advance that as an excuse for what happened out there today. Not with me they don’t. I think it was a very poor performance, one of the worst things I have ever seen done on a cricket field. Goodnight.”

What had caused what Chappell refers to as his Melbourne “brain-snap” that February day? It seemed the writing had been on the wall all season, although a brush with officialdom on the morning of the game brought things to the surface. Prior to the start, with temperatures nudging 40c, Chappell sought out ACB chairman and chair of selectors Phil Ridings regarding a possible reduction in the overs due to the heat. When Ridings denied, stating that this was only possible because of inclement weather, Chappell replied “Phil, this is far from clement”.

Moreover, as captain, the phone could be ringing from 6am right through until midnight. Chappell was, he remarked, a “sitting duck” with nobody on hand to help him shoulder the burden. Looking back on events in 2020 he mused “I was struggling. I was struggling to sleep. I was struggling to eat, and it was really affecting my ability to perform. It all bubbled up at the MCG on February 1”. As the final delivery of the New Zealand innings came round, Chappell formulated his get-out plan. He had clearly had enough and recalls thinking “You know what? I’ve had a gutful of this. These people (the administrators) aren’t listening” and adding, in reference to the underarm “I wonder if they’ll take notice of this?”.    

The final match of the World Series Cup – won by Australia, thus ensuring a pyrrhic series victory – is almost forgotten, apart from the sporting welcome given to the incoming Chappell from opposing captain Geoff Howarth as he made his way to the crease. Winning the fourth final and making the score 3-1 overall obviated the need for the dreaded fifth final game. The immediate and most significant cricketing upshot of the fiasco was the swift rewriting of the laws governing underarm bowling. Courtesy of Sir Donald Bradman, the underarm was outlawed from the World Series Cup rule book. Additionally, the 5-match final series was thrown overboard, with the powers that be opting instead for a best of three format.

That the Australians were immediately rattled by the underarm incident is perhaps obvious by their capitulation to Kapil Dev in the final Test of the summer against India which ended on 11 February. Chasing a modest 143 the home side were bundled out for 83, an ominous sign of things to come later in the year in England.

Worse was to follow. On 11 March Greg Chappell, perhaps predictably, announced that he would not tour England, choosing to stay at home for ‘business reasons’.  For a man who would later admit that he was ‘just gone’ that 1980-81 summer, this was a tour too many. Len Pascoe would sit out the Ashes tour, too, having opted to have surgery on his troublesome knee.  Spinners Bruce Yardley and Higgs would not make the selectors’ cut either although, oddly, slow left armer Ray Bright did. Somewhat controversially given his excellent summer with the bat, veteran campaigner Doug Walters was finally put out to grass, although the man himself had never considered himself a ‘certainty’ for the Ashes tour given his meagre record in England.

Jeff Thomson was another not selected for Ashes duty, while Graeme Yallop would return at the expense of Walters. Rookie Dirk Welham secured his birth, whereas the dashing David Hookes did not.  While Greg Chappell would pursue his business interests and rejuvenate mind and body, the leadership of the team passed to the new guard in the form of Kim Hughes, while his deputy for the trip Rod Marsh – the man who would not be king – simmered in resentment.

Storm clouds were hovering over the Australian team as they arrived in England in May 1981, both meteorologically and metaphorically. A team that had experienced the trauma of the underarm and its aftermath was still coming to terms with Greg Chappell’s decision not to tour, while the senior members of the old guard still standing, Lillee and Marsh, gave qualified support at best to his chosen successor Kim Hughes, a man they regarded as little more than an interim leader.

The experience of Kim Hughes as captain of Australia has garnered a body of literature in itself.  Geoff Lawson and Mike Whitney have most prominently attested to the shocking lack of cohesion and team spirit in England in 1981, while even those close to Lillee and Marsh squirm in discomfort when pressed on the issue.

The effects of the Australian summer of 1980-81 are manifold, but perhaps the ultimate cricketing casualty was the career of Kim Hughes, who was ultimately undone partly through his predecessor’s waning desire for extensive touring, a habit which would continue until Chappell had himself retired and Kim Hughes was driven into cricketing obscurity and replaced by Allan Border.

Greg Chappell has since remarked that his actions that Melbourne afternoon four decades ago were a ‘cry for help’ – such was the anxiety that had enveloped him.  With hindsight, Greg Chappell realised just how unfit for leadership he was at that time, exhausted as he was from the relentless treadmill of international cricket. He has even stated that he would not have demurred had the ACB removed him from his post in the aftermath of the underarm, even adding that this would have come as a relief.  Speaking in 2020 he recalled “I wasn’t even aware until that day and almost until that moment just how strung-out I was and how unfit to captain Australia I was

In 2021 we know more about the psychological demands of elite sport and several high profile ‘cries for help’ since Chappell’s day have increased the understanding of its dangers among those who manage the game.  Perhaps the biggest leap forward is that the modern-day player, glimpsing the signs of burnout, can feel able to publicly state their need for a break from the game without resorting to the cover of the euphemism ‘business reasons’.     

 

 



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/3CIX7uV

Monday, August 9, 2021

A Review of The Hundred So Far

The Hundred is a 100-ball professional cricket tournament involving men’s and women’s teams from a number of major cities across England and Wales. Locations include Leeds, Manchester, Cardiff, Southampton, Nottingham, London, and Birmingham.  With the event’s first-ever tournament currently underway and the final match set to take place on August 21, results are continuing to pour in. Continue reading to find out everything you need to know about The Hundred 2021 so far.

The rules

As a brand-new competition, a number of cricket fans were apprehensive about the format of the games and were quick to draw comparisons to the Twenty20, or T20. One of the first rules is that the toss does not have to take place on the ground. Each inning will also only include 100 balls as opposed to 120 at T20. Finally, The Hundred has decided to ignore the age-old rule of overs in cricket and instead divide 100 balls into blocks of five deliveries with bowlers permitted to bowl a maximum of two consecutive blocks of five deliveries.

The first match

After a two-year-long wait and banking on the popularity of the T20 cricket tournament, The Hundred finally kicked off on July 21 with a women’s match between Manchester’s Originals and London’s Oval Invincibles. With a 7,395-strong crowd cheering them on, both teams were off to a solid start. It was Manchester Originals captain Kate Cross’ turn to bat first before striking three times in her first seven balls in the run chase. Oval Invincibles appeared to be falling behind with 12 for 3 and 36 for 4 but Dane van Niekerk pulled it back by adding 73 with Marizanne Kapp. The Oval Invincibles lead their team to victory in the end by five wickets and two balls remaining. Dane van Niekerk was later crowned the player of the match.

 Predictions so far

 With the final match of this year’s tournament set to take place on August 21, cricket fans are already familiarising themselves with the latest cricket betting and odds ahead of each upcoming match. For example, a number of cricket experts have already predicted a Northern Superchargers victory at this year’s event. Southern Brave is also predicted to excel while Birmingham Phoenix, London Spirit and Welsh Fire are considered outsiders. To date, Southern Brave and Trent Rockets are some of the event’s frontrunners poised to win. But with a number of surprising results so far, any team could step up to the plate and walk away with the coveted prize money at the end of the month.

Key standout moments

As with any major sporting tournament, the games have already provided fans with a number of key standout moments. 16-year-old Alice Capsey made history when she scored 59 from 41 balls, including 10 fours, during Oval Invincibles second win over London Spirit on July 25. With a crowd of over 13,000 cheering her on, she now has her sights set on the England national team. As a result, Oval Invincibles are the team to beat at this year’s tournament. Another standout moment came in the form of Trent Rockets’ win against Northern Superchargers. Despite losing wickets, Alex Hales stepped in to hit a six to win and caused a crowd frenzy. Finally, this year’s The Hundred was a defining moment in Abtaha Maqsood’s cricket career. At only 22-years-old, the up-and-coming Scottish bowler made waves on the pitch during her debut with Birmingham Phoenix whilst wearing a hijab.

As we reach the halfway point of The Hundred, the tournament has already given us a number of standout moments and surprise results. With two weeks to go, the ball is in anyone’s court.



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/3s60ur5

10 Fascinating Cricket Rules That You Need to Know

Cricket is one of the most popular sports globally, surpassed in total viewership only by football. Obviously, things would be very different without India, but it’s still a popular discipline in many other countries worldwide. It certainly is hard to dismiss its charm, but sometimes newcomers to the sport may feel baffled by some of its rules. Since there are 42 Laws of Cricket and many subrules, we will look at some situations that may come up in T20 cricket and leave you confused. Compared to these, rules for Super Over may seem simple.

1. The batsman can’t hit the ball twice.

If you’ve ever wondered why the batsman skipped striking the ball for a second time even though he had the perfect opportunity, you may be surprised. A batsman is considered out after a second willful strike at the ball with the bat if none of the fielders have touched it.

A game of cricket wouldn’t be as fun if there weren’t some exceptions to this rule. A batsman can touch and return the ball to the fielder after asking for permission. Also, they are allowed to hit the ball for the second time if they are trying to protect the wickets from getting hit by the ball.

2. Hitting the Spidercam counts as a dead ball.

Indeed, such a thing can happen. When Glen Maxwell, the Australian batting all-rounder, managed to launch the ball directly at the camera during the match with India. The umpire declared a dead-ball as per protocol, prompting a do-over of the throw.

This rule also applies if the ball hits the stadium’s roof, which is probably easier to do.

3. If a tree is growing on your cricket ground, it’s considered a boundary.

The ICC rulebook states that any fixed obstacles are considered boundaries if both team captains agree. Furthermore, if the ball hits such an obstacle without bouncing, it counts as a boundary score.

The South African cricket stadium in Pietermaritzburg is one of the rare ones with a big tree growing inside the terrain grounds, where such a rule would even merit discussion.

4. Don’t ever kick the ball over the boundary.

If you are playing as a fielder and kick the ball that was going over the boundary rope anyway, five penalty runs will be awarded to the batting team. In case you were wondering, those five are going on top of the four runs that the batter would get for their team.

In a match between South Africa and India, such a situation occurred as Virender Sehwag kicked the ball, and the umpire called for five penalty runs.

5.  Cricket can be played without the bails.

Such an occurrence happened in a match between Afghanistan West Indies in June 2017. Due to heavy winds, captains and umpires agreed that the game could be played without bails, as they weren’t able to set them up.

6. Prepare for batting or get timed out.

Even diehard cricket fans may not be aware that if the next batter isn’t ready to bat within three minutes, according to Law 31, he may be timed out. Such situations hardly ever happen in professional and international events, but it may be a fun piece of trivia for the next game you’re watching in a pub with your friends.

7. Catch the ball with your hands first.

Interestingly, any balls that come into contact with players’ clothing are considered ground if they don’t land straight into their palms. This is true even if another fielder would catch the ball after it touched their teammate’s clothing.

8. There is a rule for cases when the ball becomes unrecoverable.

If the ball is lost and there’s no way of recovering it, the delivery is considered dead, and the ball is replaced with another one. This still goes in favor of the batting team since they get awarded penalty runs.

9. To get a wicket, you need to appeal to the umpire first.

It may seem strange to football fans, but some situations in cricket need to be appealed to the umpire to count. Under the definition of Law 31, batsmen can’t be ruled out by the umpire if the fielding side doesn’t make an appeal first.

10.         The umpire’s signal needs to be acknowledged by scorekeepers before the game can continue.

As the game progresses, the umpire usually gives different signals. For those sitting at home and watching the match, it may look strange who the signals are made for. They are meant for the scorekeepers that also need to acknowledge they understood the umpire’s call. This is usually done by waving a flag after seeing the signal.



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/3jvZmJq

Sunday, August 8, 2021

Is It Difficult To Make a Well-Received Cricket Game?

There are many online video games now available throughout different platforms. From racing cars to playing soccer and even cricket. However, when it comes to cricket, there seems to be a shortage of good games that people want to play. They either miss a crucial element or are just not engaging enough. So when you are looking to better this, how would you go about creating one that is well-received? We take a look at a few of the things to consider below.

Video gaming companies, such as Activision Blizzard or Epic Games and Electronic Arts, and others have one thing in common, they make games well and have a huge fan base that plays all their selections of games continuously. They have everything from first-person shooting games, sports games, to strategy and more. But when it comes to Cricket, there are very few video games out there that do the trick.

One of the more popular ones is Cricket 19, which is created by an Australian gaming company based in Melbourne, but not many know if there will be a new version of it or not, yet. With just one exception of Brian Lara cricket, which was not well-received and as such pulled off the shelves and customers had to get a refund on their purchases.

The difference is, when playing a specific online game such as Poker, which has been around for decades and many online companies such as GGPoker.co.uk specialise in it, you can be sure to get your money’s worth because they have a large budget to create some of the best games for you to play online, as well as immaculate features that keep you engaged for hours. If this mentality is put into a cricket video game, chances are it can become just as popular and engaging. So, how does one go about doing this?

How To Create A Good Cricket Video Game

The first step to creating any game is to recognise the complexities of the game. In this case – Cricket. As well as the complexities of the platform and device you will be playing it on. Any good developer would agree that to make a good game there needs to be immaculate conception and detailed follow-through that streamlines the process from start to finish with no glitches in between.

Many have tried to make suggestions on how to make a proper cricket video game, and this is just a basic guide into some other aspects. Perhaps a good suggestion could be to have players in conversation with each other at the beginning of the game, whilst having a drink and make it as realistic as possible. There are many other things you can do to show progression over the game, perhaps a timeline of events from that discussion up to the upcoming Cricket World Cup or ICC games. Showing training grounds and team players playing various friendly games between each other.

You can add the variation of different types of games, with three different teams, and a variety of different ballers and batsmen. Don’t forget your audience! There is nothing like playing a video game cricket game and having thousands of fans cheering you on once you hit that 6! Include actual rivals in leagues and have options of changing their outfits. Also do not forget the rewards every time a player or team wins the game.

Add a new dimension to the game and let players recruit others. This could be a family member or friends who join you or anyone else online if you are connected to the internet and playing with or against other players from other countries.



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/3iwjITx