Friday, January 29, 2021

England v India Preview

The upcoming India vs England series in February promises to be an absolute humdinger with many of the greatest cricketers on earth facing off against each other. Both sides will enter the series in good form and with their rivalry stretching almost 90 years it has the ingredients to be one of the best international Test cricket series of 2021.

India’s recent heroics at the SCG and Gabba after being thrashed and bowled out for 36 in their Adelaide loss against Australia has raised the hype surrounding the series.

The four Test match series will be hosted by India without any spectators and the first two Tests will be played in Chennai before the second two will take place in Ahmedabad. The Tests will be followed by 5 T20is and 3 ODIs.

If one thing is certain, England is likely to face an even stronger Indian team that the Aussies did. Not only will India have home advantage, but they also missed key players in their historical Australian triumph.

Former Australian captain and cricket legend Ricky Ponting recently admitted that he was shocked to have seen Tim Paine’s Australian side lose against what was virtually an “India A” side.

“I’m quite shocked that Australia weren’t quite good enough to win this series. The cold hard facts of it are pretty much that was the India A team that played this Test match and (India) still won,” Ponting told cricket.com.au.

The series will be the first time that the nations play in Tests since the 2018 Pataudi Trophy in England which England won 4-1, though England’s last tour to India ended in a 4-0 defeat in the 2016/17 season. England have had the upper hand in Tests between the two nations in the past decade as they have won five out of six series by a margin of 13-3.

If there was a perfect time that India could finally get one over the English, it is now. Getting a series victory over the mighty English on the back of humbling Australia would be a dream come true for Ravi Shastri’s side. The odds certainly reflect this state of play (although there have certainly been bigger test upsets) with Joe Root’s side currently 4/1 with Betway as of 22nd January to win the series.

The fact that there will be no spectators is something that could just work to the advantage of the English. Indian crowds are known for their passionate support of the home side and can act as the team’s 12th man, giving them that extra bit of momentum when they need it.

Whilst the slow Indian pitch conditions can be difficult for teams outside the sub-continent, England would have had a good warm-up and acclimatization to sub-continent pitches in their series against Sri Lanka this month.

India named their squad for the first two tests and in it included the name of captain Virat Kohli who missed two out of his nation’s recent series in Australia due to paternity leave and fast bowler Jasprit Bumrah who missed the final Test against Australia in Brisbane due to injury.

All-rounder Hardik Pandya returns to the India team after working overtime to return to fitness.

The injury prone but experienced Ishant Sharma who missed India’s triumph over Australia owing to an injury sustained during the IPL is set to bolster the Indian pace attack. Should the 32-year-old Sharma play in three of the four tests, he will become only the second Indian pace bowlers in history (after Kapil Dev) to have played 100 or more Tests.

Youngster Prithvi Shaw is set to be dropped from the Indian team in order to work on his batting. The 21-year-old was notably in poor form in the India Premier League as he reached a top score of just 10 in his last seven innings for the Dehli Capitals.

He was unable to recover his form despite getting a chance at the top of the order in the Adelaide Test against Australia as he finished with scores of 0 and 4.

Meanwhile, England will welcome back ace all-rounder Ben Stokes and fast bowler Jofra Archer for the India series after the two were rested for the Sri Lanka games. Batsman Rory Burns will also return to the team after missing the Sri Lanka series due to the birth of his child. Moeen Ali who missed the Sri Lanka series has also made the side.

Notable absentees from the England squad are Jonny Bairstow, Sam Curran and Mark Wood.

Evergreen pace bowlers James Anderson and Stuart Broad will bolster the English pace attack. The 38-year-old Anderson who made his international debut back in December 2002 now enters his 19th year of international cricket.



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/3iXe4bM

The different cricket games that you have to check out

For cricket fans, it isn’t all about getting your fix by watching the latest Tests or one-day games on TV. Of course, we all love watching the biggest clashes in the sport, and there’s nothing better than spending a few hours watching some of the best players on the planet do their thing.

However, due to the popularity of the sport, there are many other ways to stay interested in cricket. One way, obviously, is through gaming. Like most other sports, there are many great games that are dedicated to cricket, available on all forms of technology. Here we look at some that any cricket fan needs to check out.

Cricket Captain 2020

There are many games that we could’ve picked, however Cricket Captain 2020 is one that should attract players because of the number of legendary players that are included on the database.

So, if you want to recreate iconic moments, such as Shane Warne’s ‘ball of the century’, or a lengthy knock from Brian Lara, then this is the ideal game for you. It’s available on PC and has built up a large fan base.

Ashes Cricket

Clearly, the game is all about the Ashes, which is one of the most intense and historic rivalries in all sport. It’s a clash that attracts attention from fans across the world, but it has to be the pinnacle of the game for any English or Aussie player. With Australia already 1/2 favourites with bookies like Space Casino, this might be the only opportunity England has of taking home the little urn.

And, this is your chance to get a taste of that action.

Stick Cricket

Mobile gaming is a hugely popular method of playing, so it’s no surprise that great game are available on that platform. And, one of those is Stick Cricket. With over 10 million downloads, this mini cricket game is just great fun to play.

There’s nothing too complex with it, as you only have two buttons to press when it comes to picking the type of shot you want to make. But, it’s great fun and an easy way to pass time if you are ever bored.

WCC 2

If you are looking for a more serious cricketing mobile game, then World Cricket Championship 2 has to be the one for you.

It comes with a huge depth of venues, international teams and domestic teams as you chase glory. Perhaps the best aspect is the range of batting and bowling options, the in-game options and even the use of Hawkeye. The fact it’s been downloaded more than 50 million times makes it the undisputed number one mobile cricket game out there, and it’s easy to see why.

Ultimately, there’s plenty of games for cricket fans to enjoy, and it’s a great way to spend your free time if you have a love for the sport. Of course, there are many more we could’ve picked, but these four should be games that you consider!



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/2YmIESJ

Sunday, January 24, 2021

Draws in Cricket

“Doubtful it stood,

As two spent swimmers that do cling together

And choke their art.”

If one were to describe a ‘draw’ in cricket, there won’t be many better images than the one created from the above lines of Shakespeare’s Macbeth. Test cricket is unique as it has four possible results: Win, Loss, Tie and Draw. The difference between a tie and a draw can be explained in the following words: In a tied test both sides can equally lay claim to success in the game, a sort of joint winners without the word ‘winner’ used. If one were to explain this in the context of Limited overs cricket, the Natwest Series final of 2005 ended in a tie between Australia and England and they were deemed to have shared the trophy. (Though this was the situation in simpler times, we have since moved on to the era of Super-Overs)

On the other hand, in a draw both sides have failed to dislodge the other in order to achieve success in the game. It doesn’t matter if the two teams have played out a run-fest on a flat deck or a nail-biting thriller, the result would still be deemed as a draw.

This ‘failure’ could pan out in several forms. Let us take a look at them:

  1. Plain-ones: The worst of this lot are games washed out by rain, for the little or no cricket that you get can be really frustrating as a viewer. Mostly though, these play out on flatter decks where both sides pile on immense totals and there is little or no chance of a result by the fifth day.

On occasions though, even these can have their moments of entertainment as some of the non-regular bowlers can be given a bowl even getting a wicket at times (Alastair Cook getting Ishant Sharma at Nottingham in 2014) or the teams can try and focus on creating mini-contests in a game which is otherwise, heading towards a certain draw. (Sri Lanka in Chennai Test 2005 finished a rain affected game after taking a lead of one run over India’s first innings effort)

  1. Decisive Draws: These are those which determine the outcome of a series and thus have a particular value in the eyes of fans. They are usually the final tests of a close series. A comparable situation in Limited overs cricket are the knock-out games, which irrespective of the manner in which they pan-out always garner the maximum eyeballs. The Oval Test in 2005 became valuable because it helped England regain the Ashes. The Sydney 2004 test helped Australia save a series against India.
  2. The Near Results: Let’s open up towards the more exciting of the lot now. These tests produce some good cricket, with the game open till the end however, the nail-biting contest ends up in a draw. India vs West Indies (2011) at Mumbai and Zimbabwe vs England (1996) at Bulawayo ended with the scores tied but the chasing side had not lost all its wickets. (Otherwise, the game would’ve been a tie) These are fun to watch because they usually feature sides taking risks towards the end of the game, thus opening up possibilities of all four results to the game.
  3. Twist in the Tale: The games where the conditions and pitch indicate that the match would finish in a particular way, but things take a turn for something else. Could be an excitement on the final day of an otherwise dull test like in 2006 on an extremely flat wicket of Faisalabad, where only 23 wickets had fallen over 410+ overs, Pakistan went from 488-3 to 490-8. This loss of five wickets for two runs was down to some excellent bowling from Zaheer Khan and RP Singh but had little impact on outcome of the game. Another instance is the first Test of England tour of Pakistan 2015, which saw a Pakistani collapse and England left with a chase of 99 runs in the final few overs. The English failure to do the same ensured a draw, but the final day was a stark contrast to the way in which the rest of the test had panned out.

On the other hand, it could also mean a test which seems like it is heading for a certain day 3 or 4 finish being converted into a draw like in Wellington 2014 where India had a lead of 152 runs over New Zealand who had only five of their wickets left in their second innings. Brendon McCullum scored his country’s only triple hundred and Watling and Neesham chipped in an epic fightback which not only took a certain win away from India but also allowed New Zealand to have a go at Indian batters for about 50 overs.

  1. The Great Escapes: The ‘what-makes-test-cricket-special’ category of draws. Game set on the last day with only one side in sight of victory. And at one point it seems that they have enough overs in hand to enforce that win. It takes a special kind of fight to endure the pressure if your skill-set doesn’t include batting or are injured and have to play out for a draw. In fact, playing out for a draw in itself might muddle a few heads and defensive mindset might lead to collapses. England at Cardiff 2009 with James Anderson and Monty Panesar surviving the crucial last overs, a weakened Australia fighting out to save the test versus Pakistan in Dubai 2018 and the recent Sydney special by Ashwin and Vihari can all come in as examples of the above.
  2. The Blockathon: South African specialty, but teams with South Africans can do the job as well. (England at Eden Park 2013)
    Basically dig in the trenches and bat like your T20 contracts depend on the number of dots you play. South Africa at Adelaide in 2012, Colombo 2014 and even the failed vigils at Capetown 2020 and Delhi 2015, took some special effort and a kind of cricket that includes batting at a scoring rate reminiscent of the middle of 20th Definitely not always the most exciting of tests to watch, unless you are hoping your team pulls off the impossible.


from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/3a0ZnQK

From The Pen of the Typhoon

Even by today’s standards Frank Tyson’s cricket career was a short one, and in 1950s England it could almost be called fleeting. He played a single match in 1952 and then, at the age of just 30, he was gone at the end of the summer of 1960. Whilst short Tyson’s career did not want for drama,  and he enjoyed much success, particularly in Australia in 1954/55. For those interested in his cricket career I tell the story of that here.

One of the reasons for the delayed start to Tyson’s career was his, in a time when many fewer did so than they do today, going to University. A man who got a degree in English Literature from Durham was always likely to be a man who might turn his hand to writing, and so it was to be with Tyson.

Going into teaching after retirement Tyson also spent the summer of 1961 playing as a professional for Todmorden in the Lancashire League and writing his autobiography, A Typhoon Called Tyson. The book was an unusual one of its type in that Tyson did not, as one would hope from a man with his academic background, employ a ghost. That said he clearly took advice, and specifically acknowledged input from two of the very best, Alan Ross and John Arlott.

The book is a very good one, the more enjoyable because so many books of that type in that era were so disappointing. That said Tyson’s publishers no doubt encouraged him to express a few controversial views, and those that hit the headlines were on the subject of the then current England captain, Peter May.

What was not so widely reported were Tyson’s views on May the cricketer; as a batsman I have never met his peer – he is driven by a dynamic compelling force. The opinion that caused the interest was what followed; More than any other skipper I have played under he lacked the common touch …… every man is entitled to be aloof and pursue his own way, but this policy in a cricket captain, particularly off the field, can be disastrous.

That 1961 summer was Tyson’s last in England. Like his great hero Harold Larwood before him Tyson decided to return to the scene of where he had caused such carnage a few years before. He became what was then known as a ‘ten pound Pom’, and emigrated to Australia. The situation was not however quite the same as with Larwood, Tyson never having been unpopular with Australians, and he was married to an Australian.

In Australia Tyson taught History, French and English at Carey Grammar School in Melbourne, where future Australian captain Graham Yallop was one of his charges. He remained in teaching until 1975 at which point he became the first full time coaching director of the Victorian Cricket Association. That was a role that enabled him to take up a number of other coaching assignments around the world and there are a number of instructional books that bear Tyson’s name.

Tyson also found himself in demand with the ABC and landed himself a fascinating appointment as a summariser for the 1974/75 Ashes during which a new pair of Australian fast bowlers, Dennis Lillee and Jeff Thomson, dictated the course of the series. Later Tyson gathered together his thoughts for a book, Test of Nerves. A year later, and from the same vantage point, he wrote The Hapless Hookers, an account of Australia’s 5-1 defeat of West Indies in 1975/76.

There was a partial departure from the same formula the following year when The Centenary Test appeared. The similarity was that this contained a day by day account of the Centenary Test. The departure was that the book was in a magazine format and, the historian in him emerging for the first time, Tyson included an account of the first ever Test a century before. Also present was a feature on Man of the Match Derek Randall, and Tyson’s account of the celebratory dinner that brought together so many survivors of Ashes contents going back to the 1920s.

A further three years were to pass before a further book from Tyson appeared, and then in 1980 there were two. The first was the more interesting, War or Peace. In a sense this was reminiscent of his earlier tour accounts, but the background was very different. In the 1979/80 Southern Hemisphere summer two sides toured Australia at the same time, West Indies and England, as the Australian Board tried their best to repair the hole in their finances that the World Series Cricket schism had caused.

Tyson’s book sets the scene by explaining how peace was brokered and what the terms of it were. He then goes on to give accounts of the three Tests Australia played against each opponent. Interestingly the 14 ODIs that comprised a triangular contest are not covered at all, perhaps reflecting the relative lack of importance that Tyson attached to them as well as the fact that the hosts did not, no doubt to the Board’s chagrin, reach the best of three final.

The second Tyson book was one with a historical bias, The Century Makers: Men Behind the Ashes, 1877–1977. If not exactly ten a penny books about Ashes history are not uncommon and in that era plenty were published. As the title suggests Tyson’s book concentrated more on the individuals who had starred in the matches rather than the contests themselves and Tyson certainly did plenty of research. Reasonably well received the book did pass one acid test, in that there was an updated edition published in 1982 suggesting that, after the heroics of Ian Botham and Bob Willis in 1981, sales had been encouraging. I am not however aware of a third edition ever appearing.

In 1987 Tyson published The Test Within. Sub titled Talent and Temperament in 22 Cricketers the book is a series of pen portraits ranging from the most popular cricketers of Tyson’s own time, like Len Hutton, Denis Compton and Keith Miller, through to contemporary heroes like Imran Khan, Kapil Dev and Ian Botham. As the sub title suggests the purpose of the essays was to try and identify what made the subjects the players they were and they certainly succeed in that, the essay on the subject of Garfield Sobers being a particularly impressive piece of work.

In 1990 Tyson fully retired, and it is an interesting feature of his writing career that his two best books appeared in retirement, albeit the first had its roots back in the 1960s at which time Tyson first became involved with the ABC when his teaching commitments permitted him to do so.

Back then if there were no Test matches Tyson would cover Melbourne Grade cricket. At the Hawthorn-East Melbourne club he was, when the club was discarding some of its archive material due to lack of space, offered the chance to help himself to anything that took his fancy. Drawn to an old cuttings book Tyson found himself in possession of what amounted to a diary kept by Tom Horan, one of the Australian side who played in the first ever Test match. Horan played in 15 Tests altogether and toured England twice including in 1878, a non Test tour but one in respect of which he compiled the book as he went along. In later years Horan became a well known cricket writer, writing under the pseudonym of Felix.

It seems that the book was put together in an unconventional way, and at the time Tyson, schoolmaster, coach and broadcaster simply did not have the time to give his find the attention it deserved and was not immediately aware of its significance. Horan’s artefact was put away once again and Tyson gave it no thought until the early 1990s when, by now retired, he found it again when moving house. This time he had the time to spend on studying the relic, and realised just what a treasure he had found.

Horan’s Diary was published in a signed limited edition by the ACS in 2001 and is, to any student of the era, a fascinating read and one which, I suspect I am right in saying, remains the ACS’s most ambitious project. Those responsible for the decision to proceed with the publication are every bit as deserving of credit as author Tyson. If there is a fault it is that the well produced hardback does not contain any photographs of the book that Tyson was working with, but that is but a minor complaint and I would imagine an omission for which there is a sound explanation.

Half a century is a long time, and 2004 marked the fiftieth anniversary of the famous tour on which Tyson made his name. There were books aplenty about the tour at the time, but none of them bore Tyson’s name. To mark the anniversary the septuagenarian dusted off his memories, those of his contemporaries, old scrapbooks and diaries and wrote his last book. In the Eye of the Typhoon is a fascinating read, superbly illustrated and conveying an impression of the touring experience as well as any book ever has. If you want to read a book about that famous tour, and some of us have read several, then Tyson’s retrospective is most certainly the one to go for.

By the time In The Eye of the Typhoon appeared Tyson had moved to the Gold Coast where he remained until his death at the age of 85. Still a creative man he seems to have concentrated on painting rather than writing, often on cricketing subjects, and it is a source of some disappointment that, as far as I am aware, very little of his artwork is in the public domain. If I am wrong in that assertion I would certainly be very pleased to stand corrected.



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/3iIJtyE

Thursday, January 21, 2021

Border-Gavaskar 2020/21 Series Review

India walked into the series without Bhuvneshwar Kumar and Ishant Sharma, they knew there wouldn’t be any Virat Kohli after the first Test and Rohit Sharma (averaging 26 abroad, yet touted as a great hope because of his extraordinary batting talent) would be available only from third test onwards. They lost Shami in the first Test, Umesh Yadav in the second, KL Rahul before the SydneyTest, Bumrah, Ashwin, Vihari and Jadeja after the epic stand-off at Sydney, Mayank Agarwal was in doubt before the final Test and Saini got injured during the fourth. Please forgive me if I missed out on a few for there were jokes on social media where the Indian side for the fourth Test might have Vikram Rathour, Ravi Shastri and Bharat Arun in the playing XI.

The playing XI for the fourth test ended up featuring three players who had stayed back as net and back-up bowlers- Washington Sundar, Shardul Thakur and T Natarajan.

They played twenty players across four tests- the most any touring team has ever featured in a Test series. Let us not even go into the personal sacrifices and commitments that many of these players missed out on while playing this Test series, just keep them in your mind while you develop a background of this series win.

It is not that the Australian side was without its challenges, Warner missed out on the first couple of games and Smith battled some indifferent form. Young talent Will Pucovski had an unfortunate time with injuries and the Australia bowling line-up seemed exhausted on the final days of the Sydney and Brisbane tests.

Still going into the third and fourth Tests, Australia would’ve been reasonably confident of doing well. For the Australian bowlers, this was the very backyard that has spawned out several great wins. Cummins, Hazelwood, Starc and Lyon are the best bowling line-up for Australia in recent times, quickly replacing the likes of Warne, Mcgrath, Gillespie, and Lee.

Smith, Labuschagne, and Warner the enforcers of Australian batting were supposed to run away with the game against India’s inexperienced bowling line-up. Tim Paine had grown into the role of the captain with his leadership in the Ashes 2019, when through astute strategy and calculated risk-taking the visitors became the first Australian side to return with the urn since 2001.

That aside the record of Australians in their own backyard is an intimidating one. I could pull out stats and state that they are amongst the toughest places to tour in the world, even though their proud record of late has been soiled due to recent losses against South Africa and India.

But that doesn’t tell the complete story. It is how Australian conditions are different from any other touring destination that makes the difference. You might give your best performance on the first three days of the test and yet end up on the losing side. First innings leads mean only so much if you have the endurance to turn up and continue fighting for every single session.  It is why the Australian players well adapted to those conditions, are able to best even the most resilient of performances from visiting sides.

There is no terrible swing or turn on offer to seep doubt into your mind like in other places, but there is the feeling that even if you get in and stitch in a decent partnership, a couple of wickets here and the game might open up. Look no further than England in Adelaide 2006.

This is what makes winning in Australia all the more special. And to do that with a squad that featured only two players featuring across all four tests, with inexperience to the boot in the bowling line-up and missing one of the best batsmen in the world is a job comprehensively well done.

The team management and Indian setup in general (including the NCA, A team and U19 setup) need to take the credit for this turnaround. Every single Indian player walked in with the intent to not just do well but win the game. India might have lost the Oval Test in 2018 but its spirit is what helped them with a series win down under. There would have been no epic draw had Pant and Pujara not continued with their natural game in Sydney and gotten India closer to the target. India only decided to shut the shop after Vihari was left in a position where he found it was tough for him to stand, let alone continue with the game.

The young Siraj, Shardul, Sundar and Gill all walked in and performed as if they were veterans on a third or fourth tour down under. The old lot Pujara, Rahane, Bumrah, Ashwin and Jadeja used all their experience to best use, even putting their own well-being on the line for the team.

Then there was the small matter of Rishabh Pant. He was mocked by fans and critics alike for his mistakes on the field as a keeper (who’d often chant ‘Dhoni, Dhoni’ as if to remind him who remained the people’s favourite), even questioned by team management on occasions for his ‘repetition of mistakes’ only months after he had been India’s find of the tour in Australia (2018-19) and left out of the playing XI in the pink ball test only days after he had scored a scintillating hundred in the practice game.

Without taking away from efforts from any other player from either side: the number of runs, the tempo of innings, the fifth day pitch and the situation at which the games were poised- all indicate that the fire-and-ice approach of Pant was the difference between the two sides on the final day. If there are issues with his keeping (not saying that he can’t improve, as many of his famed predecessors did over the years) and Saha is preferred as a keeper, he has done enough to show through his sixteen-test career that he is definitely a good fit purely as a batsman.

To call it merely a sigh of relief for Indian fans for their team to figure out how to deal with the final day of a test match for back-to-back games would be incorrect. (Though many fans would admit that the ghosts of Mumbai 2006 must’ve been hanging on their minds as India were looking to bat on day 5 of the last two tests)

It was one of the greatest comebacks ever in the history of Test match cricket, definitely the greatest overseas series win for India. It wasn’t just about bouncing back from ‘36’ or winning on the final day in Gabba. It was about the fact that India were in a corner having endured an excessive number of injuries, facing abuse and tough conditions were able to beat a full-strength Australian side.

The argument that many experts brought forward before the series was that with Warner and Smith, India would find it tough to compete let alone beat Australia in Australia.

India has improved massively as a touring side with a blip between 2011-2014 but have largely been able to compete and even win abroad. However, their series wins in England, New Zealand and Australia (traditionally tough touring places for Subcontinental teams), came against teams that lacked some of their better players. India won in England against a side that missed out on services Harmison, Flintoff and Hoggard, they won against New Zealand in 2009 but that wasn’t the strongest of New Zealand teams and they won against Australia in 2018-19 without playing Warner or Smith.

This is not to take away from any of these wins, they were all brilliant wins in their own right but to put the present result in context. This win came against the side consisting of David Warner, Steve Smith, Josh Hazelwood, Marnus Labuschagne, Mitchell Starc, Nathan Lyon and Pat Cummins. Some of these players are already considered or on their way to become all-time greats for Australia.

For Australia as they plan to set out on a big tour to South Africa, the questions remain. Was it prudent to continue with the same bowling attack for all four games, despite the indifferent form of Starc and Lyon? One feels that had Australia rested a seamer for the third test and rotated players effectively after the first two games, they would’ve had fresh legs running on day 5 of the test.

The second big question for Australia will be looking for a leader going ahead. WIll they continue with Tim Paine for this important Ashes year? Chris Silverwood’s men would certainly be making plans and stratagems of their own, taking notes from Indian success as well as the Australian side of 2019 for a victory down under. It would be wise for the selectors to take a call now and build towards the next home season.

All is not lost as Australia got some good performances from Marnus Labuschagne and Pucovski, Smith returned back to what he does best, Cummins and Hazelwood were at their absolute finest and Cameron Green holds a lot of potential. If we know anything about Australia, they will be raring to go and fight back after this disappointing result. That means that we can look forward to some great cricket.

For people who value Test cricket, the big series are valued as much as some of the World tournaments in cricket. This Border Gavaskar trophy will certainly go down as one of the greatest ever series rivaling the likes of Ashes 1981, Border-Gavaskar Trophy 2001 and West Indies tour of Australia 1960-61.

 



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/393y2y1

Tuesday, January 19, 2021

Cricket and The National Question

When Matt Renshaw had to answer an unexpected call of nature during the 2017 Border Gavaskar test at Pune and paid heed to it by retiring hurt, the former Australian skipper Allan Border wasn’t impressed. He remarked “I hope he is lying on the table in there half dead. Otherwise as captain I would not be happy” to Fox Sports. This wasn’t the first time Border had urged for his countrymen to give their all on the cricket field, having fired up Dean Jones during the tied Madras test in 1986 with the ‘Weak Victorian’ comment. The idea was for the individual to stand up and fight for the country and the team.

These utterances seem like they belong to another world in the era of T20 leagues and friendlier relations between cricketers. Sure, International cricket still holds its importance but it has found strong financial challengers in in the form of franchise cricket around the world like IPL, BBL, CPL etc. which inevitably feature the best of talents from around the world.

Cricket continues to be played with similar vigour as it was played in the past, but scheduling of international tournaments and player priorities are worked out owing to their contractual obligations with leagues around the world.

A recent example of the talent drain was seen in the form of Andre Russell, who refused to feature in the New Zealand tour Twenty20 games, yet was seen plying his trade in the Lankan Premier League, which left even the West Indian coach Phil Simmons baffled.

The scenarios today include players retiring from one of the formats (usually Tests), making themselves unavailable for tournaments or players entering into important tours with little preparation in terms of practice games, given that T20 engagements run around the year.

At the same point of time national cricketing boards and team managements across the world have tried to scramble for a solution. The red-ball and white-ball cricket tours are largely played separately these days, shortened tours are the norm and boards seek to manage player fitness by resting them from one format or the other and keeping a larger pool of players to choose from.

The solution is a different one depending on a country’s situation. The commonality remains in the fact that the hard taskmaster approach has given way to a stress towards a more tactical solution. West Indies have recently come to terms with keeping their cricketing talent intact, even if it means that some of their Twenty20 stars are unavailable for certain international assignments. Some others allow their players to feature in specific Twenty20 leagues, given that they are available for International assignments.

While these innovative solutions work for the day and allow for international scheduling calendar to continue largely unhindered, there is no guarantee that the same would continue in the future. T10 and The Hundred are the young entrants, even as T20 leagues continue to blossom. In the earliest days of T20 leagues, only the IPL could attract the best of the talent. But now nearly every test cricketing nation (quite a few non-test nations as well) have jumped into the T20 bandwagon.

The result being that the T20 player, irrespective of nationality, have a decent chance of making money by playing in these leagues. Those who miss out on the bigger leagues, will always find takers in other leagues. Coupled with the fact that the national first class pay is paltry compared to the sums that these leagues offer and the cricketing calendar is heavily skewed in favour of certain ‘bigger’ teams playing against each other, so that many nations don’t have top teams visiting them for years on the go, these leagues are a great financial relief for several players.

We have already seen examples of players choosing formats, retiring from other formats to concentrate on T20 leagues. There is no reason to believe that the same would stop and on the contrary, it is quite possible that such cases would only rise giving more troubles to national cricket boards. But such queries and their solutions need not concern us.

It should remain with the cricketing fans who witnessed the rise and fall of the tri-series (with all their colourful jerseys and joyous memories), who saw the birth of Border Gavaskar, Chappell Hadlee, Warne Muralitharan trophies, who saw friendship cups contested between national sides to improve cricketing relations and whose world revolved around the One day and Test schedule of the year.

A lot has changed: Champions trophy once a novelty, has been done away with, the triangular series are gone, there is little to no chance of having an international test championship of the sort witnessed in late 90s (Asian Test Championship with round-robin format) and T20 cricket is on the rise. And it seems the future has a lot of changes in store for the present-day fans.

A strong possibility is the possible dilution of International cricket to an extent that the cricketing schedule of tomorrow resembles that of modern-day football (leagues with a sprinkling of internationals) with Test cricket, somehow adjusted into the scheme. (Till it continues to find its takers amongst the powers that be in the name of ‘tradition’)

But then one must understand that change is something what one would associate with the word ‘cricket’. An exclusive game featuring only certain nations (with a history of colonial rule) with only limited number of international Tests, the spectator interest lay greatly in the domestic affairs of their countries with long tours by international sides featuring a great number of side-matches.

With the interest waning in 60s, limited overs cricket was introduced which caught the imagination with the initial world cups and after the Kerry Packer years. The Indian economy liberalized in the 90s and the game got a different colour to it. While International tours had always been a part of the cricketing tradition, the One-day internationals were seen as a welcome addition.

Multi-country international tournaments such as World Championship of cricket, Australian tri-series, Sharjah Cups and Champions trophy dotted the 80s and 90s. They were not brought about by cricket lovers imagining them into existence (If the same were true, we would’ve just finished with the 27th Test World cup), rather that cricket boards could profit immensely from them.

Tournaments were booked as Independence Cups, Asia Cups, Australia-Asia Cups which raised the viewers interest with marquee contests between arch-rivals. With the lure of financial riches, all boards jumped into the bandwagon, the tri-series cricket being hosted by nearly all the test playing nations in the late 90s and early 2000s. It seems that the cricket boards learnt their nationalism in the market.

And when the dictates of the market favoured the rise of Twenty20 cricket, we saw the rise of T20 leagues around the world. There are a number of people who have questioned the efficacy of ‘The Hundred’ due to ‘release’ this year, but if it becomes a hit don’t be surprised if a world cup is played in this format before the end of this decade.

The attitudes might have changed but the commitment of the player has remained the same, case in point being the epic rear-guard action by Ashwin and Vihari in the Sydney test. At the end of the day players are human beings, who would prefer better lives which can be secured by the financial incentives of the T20 leagues. It is no different from the past, when a lot of informal tournaments (Siyaram cup featuring near full strength India and Pakistan) attracted a number of top names.

For the international cricket to continue, the answer lies with International cricket council, the viewers watching the game and the cricketing boards who run the game around the world. They have the option to decide if status quo is the best way to go forward or making such changes which allow international cricket to remain a viable product for the consumers. The decision to give all Twenty20 games between ICC members ‘International’ status will help the game spread. The World Test Championship and Cricket World Cup Super League are small steps in the right direction to introduce a league-based system permanently.

It is obvious that the international game will stick along for quite some time, but the direction it heads towards can be modified by changes made to the calendar today. It might take innovation on the part of administrators and some tough calls.

 



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/39MMycD

Wednesday, January 6, 2021

The winners and losers from cricket in 2020

Cricket was able to escape the cold hard death grip of the pandemic. In 2020, cricket was one of the few sports that survived its season. When looking back on the year, there were some clear winners and losers of the cricket season. 

 

Winner: Australia’s women T20 team

The Australian national team arguably had the best year out of any sport. Despite a rough start, Meg Lanning’s team was able to put the team on the map. Australia claimed the Women’s T20 World Cup after losing on opening night. The red hot favorites nearly shocked Betway Cricket by getting eliminated on day four of the competition, but were able to swing a strong comeback. 

After fighting back to make the semi-finals, the host nation decimated India in front of over 80,000 fans. The 86,174 fans watching the women’s team was just short of the world record for a women’s sporting event (90,185). After claiming the championship, the postparty was a pure celebration that even saw Katy Perry go viral for her performance on stage. 

 

Winner: The United States

Satya Nadella is among a group backing Major League Cricket, a new U.S. based cricket tournament run by American Cricket Enterprises set to begin in 2022. Nadella is reported to run a team out of Seattle. Over the years, Seattle has been starting youth leagues for cricket, so it’s not surprising that the city would want a professional franchise. 

The Los Angeles Knights, headlined by owner Shah Khan, enter the league with franchises 

based out of New York, San Francisco, Dallas, Chicago, and Washington D.C. Khan’s firm will also help cities with building cricket stadiums. Reportedly, one of Khan’s firms will also try to start up a T20 cricket tournament. 

 

Loser: Kevin Roberts

The early part of the pandemic was not a great time to be a boss in any major sport. That proved to be true for the Cricket Australia chief. His critics believe that the game was immune to the financial crisis that had been beset by the global economy. Instead, the ICC T20 World Cup was postponed, as well as the 2021 cup. There are a lot of minor stories that could have been handled differently as well. The face of the sport did not have a great look in 2020. 

 

Loser: Yorkshire

The Final Test between West Indies and England came at an emotional time. There were growing frustrations of the pandemic. It was at the critical point of the Black Lives Matter movement, just six weeks after the death of George Flyod. It was a time to think about the events, which led to both sides taking a knee, but what happened later was even larger. Azeem Rafiz, a former 19-U captain for England, spoke of racism during his time at Yorkshire. He has since filed a lawsuit. The club has since commented on the incident, saying that they do not tolerate any form of racism; however, Rafiz’s comments say otherwise. 



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/3pS47P5

Looking Back: The top cricket stories of 2020

It’s hard to believe that cricket was able to be played in 2020 but it managed to escape the pandemic’s grip. Since cricket was one of the few sports that made it through the year, we can assess some of the top stories that came from the sport, including these top 2020 cricket headliners.

Major League cricket announcement for United States

Tech giant CEO Satya Khan has been a part of the rise of cricket since the start and is the most excited about the league coming to the United States. Online cricket betting has made its way to America thanks to Khan spearheading the movement. 

Khan’s team will be based in Los Angeles and will be one of six participating franchises in the Major Cricket League in the United States. One of Khan’s firms is reportedly a part-owner of the company and is looking into starting a T20 cricket tournament and it will be expected to begin in the year 2022. Along with the Los Angeles Knight Riders, the league will feature franchises based out of New York, San Francisco, Dallas, Chicago, and Washington D.C. Khan’s firm will also help cities with building cricket stadiums. 

Australia recognized during awards

The International Cricket Council (ICC) gave Australia some recognition with some of the names that were on the list of the “Awards of the Decade.” Ellyse Perry won Female Cricketer of the Decade, while Steve Smith won Men’s Test Cricketer of the Decade. Perry was also named the ODI and Women’s T20I Cricketer of the Decade. 

Women’s cricket on the rise

The 2020 Women’s T20 Challenge (WT20C) has to be one of the best stories of 2020. The WT20C logged 5.34 billing minutes in viewership in India according to recent reports. Compared to last year’s 2.20 billion minutes, that’s 2.45 times larger this year. The data was obtained from ESPNcricinfo from Broadcast Audience Research Council India and Star. The report stated that this year’s tournament recorded a 147% increase among view minutes, 47% increase in unique views, and was aired across 11 Star Sports channels compared to eight last year. 

COVID & Movement

In July, the ICC announced that both the 2020 and 2021 editions had been postponed due to the pandemic. That forced the 2020 tournament to move to November 2021, and the 2021 tournament moved to October 2022. Both India and Australia held onto their rights to host the tournament. India will be the host site in 2021, while Australia will host in 2022. 

MS Dhoni Retirement

The former Indian captain was great at giving the best cricket tips to his teams. However, he decided to step away from the game in August 2020 on the day of India’s 74th independence. He posted a video on Instagram that contained pictures of the highs and lows of his career. Dhoni was later named the ICC Men’s ODI Cricketer of the Decade in November.

 



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/3bdOVaK

Tuesday, January 5, 2021

Top 5 Test series upsets in 2010s

‘Upset’ in sports terminology is a reference to an underdog doing the unimaginable by either holding a superior side for a draw/tie or defeating them. There is something about the ‘Rocky Balboa’ experience that excites our imagination. Perhaps, the fact that the less touted also have their moment to shine is what makes them connect with the viewers. It could mean anything from an inexperienced side stunning the world champions (Ashraful taking the fight to Australia and winning in Cardiff 2005) to a non-test playing Kenya entering the semi-finals of the 2003 World Cup in South Africa after having beaten the likes of Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe.

The magic of an ‘upset’ has been quite regularly witnessed in World cups, (both ODI and T20I) like Bangladesh stunning Pakistan in 99, the uncertain Zimbabwe, marred by multiple issues, beating the then ODI world champions Australia in the inaugural ICC World T20 2007 and Netherlands beating England in the ICC World T20 tournaments of 2009 and 2014.

However, when we venture into Test cricket, given how exclusive the format has always been (Still only twelve nations deemed good enough to play it) defining an upset becomes a tricky proposition. And whenever the newer nations, such as Bangladesh back in the early 2000s, have had better sides on the rope, (Pakistan at Multan in 2003, Australia at Fatullah in 2006) the nature of the format allows the more experienced side to find a way back.

However, it is the structure of test matches that help redefine an ‘upset’.

The Test matches are usually played as a ‘series’, thus allowing sides to make a comeback. Also, the idea of home advantage is more pronounced than any other format of the game, given how groundsmen can prepare pitches to the advantage of the home side. Thus, a sub-continental side finds the going tough when overseas while a team like England can find it tough in Asian or Australian conditions.

Then there is the idea of teams going through phases of growth and re-development. This is something that is universally applicable to all sports but takes a special place in the context of test match cricket as there are tours that take place after a period of years. (Australia toured Sri Lanka in 1999, 2004, 2011, 2016 with differing results)

A team once strong can face decline and a ‘weaker’ side (in terms of their history) might trump the favourites by playing better cricket.

Keeping all these factors in mind, let us look at some of the upsets that the previous decade (2010s) has witnessed in Test match cricket. We’ll factor in team strengths, the expectations before the series, and home advantage.

  1. Bangladesh vs Afghanistan 2019 (0-1): This was a thriller to the core. Though Afghanistan had been dominant through the test, it seemed that rain would allow Bangladesh to escape with a draw, but the Afghans fought back against all odds to snatch a win in the dying moments of the test.

The context behind the game is equally important. Bangladesh over the last decade developed a template of using their home resources to best effect and this helped them beat some of the top teams of the world, defeating Australia and England in tests at home (also beating Lanka in a test away) while inflicting ODI series defeats on India, Pakistan and South Africa. However, over the last couple of years, Bangladesh ridden by internal troubles have not been the same team as before.

Even so when Afghanistan landed to play a solitary test against Bangladesh, it was expected that Bangladesh would have the upper hand. After all Afghanistan’s debut test against India had ended within two days, Bangladesh were masters of their own backyard and the new-comers were expected to take some time to learn the nitty-gritty of Test match cricket.

The ambitious Afghans, having only debuted in the format in 2018, led by the extremely talented Rashid Khan, were able to outplay Bangladesh in each and every aspect of the game, which helped them inflict a crushing 224 run defeat on Bangladesh. This was a historic test win for Afghanistan, being their first win away from home and second win in only their third test.

For Bangladesh, the year which had seen a below-par World Cup performance (Compared to the high standards they had set earlier, reaching the semis of Champions trophy 2017) got only worse with the players’ revolt and Shakib Al Hasan’s ban for breaching ICC anti-corruption code. Afghanistan couldn’t emulate a similar result versus West Indies in Lucknow but continued to live their cricketing dream.

  1. West Indies vs England 2015 (1-1): The present West Indies team is riddled with several issues, but are in much better shape than they were at the start of 2015. After a disappointing World Cup campaign, they were supposed to face a much better England side who had ended their home season strongly against India and boasted players such as Alastair Cook, James Anderson, Stuart Broad and Ben Stokes.

While England had creditable performances both at home and abroad and remained one of the higher-ranked sides in world cricket at the time, for West Indies, a team ever in flux for the first half of 2010s and having faced a players’ rebellion a few months back, tough times lay ahead. Their leader was Denesh Ramdin, soon to lose his captaincy to a young Jason Holder and featured several players, way past their prime, in the final year of their test careers.

If one is to pause here and look at the results of both the teams over the next few months, they could say that England would’ve had it pretty easy in the Caribbean. West Indies looking to build a team, would lose the majority of their tests at home and away, while England held New Zealand for a draw, won the Ashes and a test series in South Africa.

After being held for a draw by Holder and Roach at Antigua, England won the second test at Grenada with relative ease despite some fight from the West Indians. It was in the final game that West Indies were able to come to their own and despite giving away a first-innings lead, were able to come back to win the game by five wickets.

This was a big win for West Indies, a rare one against top-flight opposition in the 21st century at that time. This was only the second win for West Indies over England since the 2000 Wisden Trophy.

Since then, the West Indies have gradually improved, registering wins against Pakistan (including one in UAE), England (four of them, including a memorable Wisden Trophy win in 2019), Sri Lanka and Bangladesh.

  1. Sri Lanka vs England 2018 (0-3): Now unlike Afghanistan, who were at the beginning of their test journey or West Indies, who suffered from several internal and external issues through the last twenty-five years, England had a much stable cricketing journey over the last two decades. But over the last five years, they produced test cricket which could be described as belonging to the ‘good but not good enough’ category.

Since 2014, they managed to remain unbeaten at home, even taking some impressive series wins over India, South Africa and Australia but never quite the dominant force they had been at the beginning of this decade. Over the same period, they hardly won away (barring in South Africa) and struggled to garner a win in places where they would have been expected to do well given their higher ranking and overall better personnel.

Sri Lanka on the other hand, once the giant at home producing wins in the 2000s at the back of Murali and co., had lost their way in 2010s. This was especially true against Sub-continent sides. They drew at home against Bangladesh, lost to Pakistan and India (twice). However, they had been able to hold their own against Australia, South Africa, and even New Zealand, as late as 2019.

England had a fairly decent record in Sri Lanka. They won under Nasser Hussain and ever since, had been able to pull some decent performances on the cricketing island, even getting a drawn series in 2012. But their recent performances in similar conditions were less than encouraging. They lost 0-2 in UAE against Pakistan in 2015, 0-4 against India in 2016, and were made to share the test series against Bangladesh 1-1.

Over the period of 2017-18, Sri Lanka seemed to have recovered some of the previously lost ground in subcontinental conditions- winning a series against Bangladesh away, winning against Pakistan in UAE and drawing twice against India during the 2017 winter tour.

Back in the groove, Lanka seemed like they had the upper hand going into the series.

England won. Not only did they win, but they also won 3-0. And they won on the back of their supposedly thin spin bowling resources- Leach and Ali got 18 wickets, Rashid got 12 wickets. The last time a non-Sub continent team had blanked Sri Lanka at home were the mighty Australians in the 2003-04 season.

Sri Lanka would go on to have a horror season of 2018-19, failing to win anything in New Zealand and Australia before readying itself for a tough tour of South Africa in 2019, where no Subcontinent team had ever won before.

  1. Zimbabwe vs Pakistan 2013 (1-1): The political turmoil in Zimbabwe and its surrounding events, found cricket to be easy prey. Once the giant-killers in the game, a team renowned for its all-rounders, never-die spirit and excellent ground fielding has fallen so down the pecking order that it was supposed to qualify for the world cup in 2019 (it didn’t) and is presently not a participant to the ICC Test Championship.

Ever since 2004, opportunities of cricket against top-ranked opposition have been limited for Zimbabwe, but in recent years they have been able to put spirited display against likes of Sri Lanka and West Indies, even if victory eluded them.

In 2013, Pakistan toured Zimbabwe for a short tour of ODIs, T20Is, and Tests. Pakistan were coming off a successful tour in the Caribbean and won everything in Zimbabwe till the final test at Harare arrived.

Zimbabwe down 0-1, won the toss and decided to bat first. They scored a decent 294 against the likes of Junaid Khan, Rahat Ali, Saeed Ajmal and Abdur Rehman. Pakistan was bowled out for 230 and Mawoyo and Masakadza helped Zimbabwe set a target of 264. Tinashe Panayangara, Brian Vitori, Tendai Chatara, and Prosper Utseya (whose cumulative test appearance is 26, which is nine less than Saeed Ajmal achieved in his brief Test career), then pulled off a miraculous win leaving Misbah stranded on 79.

This was Zimbabwe’s third test win over Pakistan, but the previous two came in what one could call the golden-era of Zimbabwean cricket in the 90s when they could stun India and South Africa in World cups, could win an away series against Pakistan and when the likes of Heath Streak, Andy Flower and Henry Olonga made cricketing headlines on a regular basis.

This win wasn’t a fairy-tale ending to a troubled era, far from it. Even today, Zimbabwe hardly play any test cricket. But this was a testament to the potential that the Zimbabwean cricket holds and is able to show time and again (Like they did when touring Sri Lanka in 2017) despite all the odds stacked up against them.

  1. South Africa vs Sri Lanka 2019 (0-2): When Sri Lanka arrived in South Africa, it was the last test playing nation where a subcontinental side had not won a test series. In a few weeks, all of that was to change.

South Africa had been riddled by a number of issues, such as achieving a perfect balance between selecting the best playing XI and implementing the transformation policy, the Kolpak troubles, and loss of some big players to retirement. With Kyle Abbott, Ab De Villiers not representing South Africa anymore and Dale Steyn towards the end of his career, changes needed to ring in for South Africa and despite their encouraging showing at home in the previous season, there were gaps that needed to be filled in terms of leadership and personnel. However, they had seemingly seen off the tougher opponents for the season, Pakistan, by defeating them 3-0 in a one-sided test series.

Sri Lanka arrived in South Africa with a forgettable last few months of cricket. Sri Lanka had also been troubled by politics around cricket, an extended transition phase, and lack of perfect replacements to fill the giant shoes of Sangakkara, Jayawardene, Dilshan, etc.

Its last tour (2016-17) ended in ten losses in eleven international outings which included being blanked 0-3 in tests. That along with general difficulties that Sub-continental teams faced when going to South Africa, meant that they were hardly expected to even put up a fight.

In the first test, Kusal Perera teamed up with Viswa Fernando to stun South Africa who had Steyn, Rabada, Philander, Olivier, and Maharaj in their line-up by pulling off what seemed like a once in life-time chase of 304 at Kingsmead. At Port Elizabeth, South Africa had the upper hand for most of the test, till Oshada Fernando and Kusal Mendis stitched together 163 runs to pull off a great chase. And with that South Africa was conquered.

The sheer improbability of the event is what makes it one of the biggest upsets in Test cricket history. Sri Lanka didn’t have the most feared bowling line-up in test cricket history, but they became wily operators who were able to best some of the finest batsmen in the business. Their batters showed enough self-belief to bat against the merit of the delivery as against the reputation of the bowler.

Coming into the series they had been beaten soundly by England, New Zealand, and Australia. They did not become world-beaters after this series, not winning any of the limited over fixtures on the tour and having a below-average World Cup performance. But in the middle of it all, they were able to pull off this great miracle.



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/396Wk9r

Border Gavaskar Mid Series Review

After India had been shot out for 36 in the first Test at Adelaide, there were two kinds of reactions which dominated the social media and cricket columns: One was of shock and horror at this unexpected turn of events after a balanced start to the Test with India in a lead going into day 3, while the other was to fight the fire which could have engulfed the team in case an inquisition was carried out.

Some critics called in for deeper introspection into the troubles of Indian cricket, while others called it a one-off event, something that might happen to any side. Having witnessed some disasters in the past, former players and fans alike could tell that the Indian side was in a spot of bother.

On some occasions one can tell what a team is going through. Teams can feel like they are ready for a fight even when down (India in the 2008 tour got crushed in the first Test, however managed to unite after the Sydney Test and became the first side to beat Australia at home in five years) or look like they are going through motions. (India in England 2011- The second Test was evenly balanced at a point, but after that defeat India felt like they were playing to finish the series rather than compete for the remaining Tests)

Sometimes they spring a surprise as well, for example, the Indian team under extreme pressure in World Cup 2003 ended up reaching the finals after a poor start.

The best thing from an Indian perspective was the relative lack of understanding of how Ajinkya’s India would play in these circumstances. With Virat, there was always the willingness to fight to the last breath, however the team was often plagued with selection errors (Wrong selections like dropping Bhuvneshwar versus South Africa in the second Test during the 2018 tour, when he was the leading wicket taker in the first one, even stunned the likes of VVS Laxman and Allan Donald) or tactical errors. (From not playing Practice games to reducing their length)

The result being that of late, while India did have some result to show, (barring the New Zealand tour in 2020, India has won an overseas Test on every tour since 2016) they made enough mistakes to let the better opponents take the series away from them. This is what led some critics to make a 4-0 assumption against India, based on the idea that India’s success on the last tour down under was due to absence of Smith and Warner and once the duo returned India would suffer the same fate as most of the sides suffer down under.

However, despite all the clamour around 36, there were a few things that were in India’s favour going into the second Test.

For one, over the years the team management had dealt with player fitness well, keeping the players match ready for different formats. This was visible when Bumrah turned up at Nottingham in 2018, not having played a game for weeks due to an injury and went on to deliver a match-winning performance.

Secondly, (at the risk of sounding Shastrisque) this team didn’t carry any baggage when away from home. They trailed 0-2 in both South Africa and England and came back to win games. While this was something that could’ve been expected from India of mid 2000s, in the first half of 2010s under Dhoni, the Indian fans got used to a sinking feeling once the team started losing games abroad. This fighting spirt was best illustrated in Oval 2018, when young guns KL Rahul and Pant, decided to go for a win rather than settle for a draw.

Thirdly, the schedule under the impact of Covid-19 forced India to play two first class games before the Tests, something that they’ve shied away from doing so in recent past. The first-class games always put the teams in a match situation and even if the side is in a tough spot, they need to find a way out, thus keeping players match-ready. The team management did well to give a try-out to most of the players, even backup players like Kartik Tyagi, so that they can be called upon in case the situation demands.

Fourthly, while India’s performance has improved overseas since the turn of the millennium, the previous decade saw India perform better in South African and Australian conditions as compared to England and New Zealand. After the disaster of 2011 tour, India though hit by selection issues gave a creditable performance in 2014 (coming close to winning a Test, competing well in another defeat and securing a couple of draws) to eventually winning a series in 2018. The core of this team in Ashwin, Pujara, Rahane have a good experience of playing in Australia and more importantly, of winning there.

India under a new leader in Rahane, went against a spirited Australia at MCG, making four changes in Shubman Gill, Rishabh Pant, Ravindra Jadeja and Mohammad Siraj. Not one of these players was to disappoint, as India held on to a breathtaking fightback to beat Australia by eight wickets.

This was big win for Indian cricket, with quite a few comparing this to the Perth win in 2008, another occasion when India was able to shut off the noise from outside and triumph over both the conditions and a formidable opponent. Another fact adding to this win is that it came in Australia, still considered to be one of the toughest places to tour in the world, since 2000s only South Africa (5), England (4), India (5) and New Zealand (1) have been able to secure a win in the country.

However, one cannot look at Test match cricket in terms of solitary games. The series is far from over. There is a lot more to be played for in terms of the Border-Gavaskar Trophy and the ICC Test championship points. Australia have been bested for most of this Test series, but to count them out would be a folly that no team can afford. They have one of the best batsmen in the world, one of the finest bowling attacks to represent the country and a return looming for David Warner, who averages a whopping 66 in Australia.  India so far have been skilful in making the best use of their bowling attack (even when they are missing out on Bhuvneshwar, Shami, Umesh and Ishant), their batting might be reinforced with some old faces for the remaining Tests, have the x-factor in players like Jadeja and Pant and are ably led by Ajinkya Rahane, who led by example scoring an exemplary hundred in trying circumstances at the MCG.

It wouldn’t be prudent to predict a score-line for the series, but what one can say is that an exciting series remains to be played out. Fans would do well to remember that West Indies, under heavy pressure from a thrashing at South Africa and after being shot out for 51 in the first Test, made a memorable comeback to hold Australia to 2-2 in the 1999 Frank Worrell Trophy, with Brian Charles Lara playing the innings of his life-time in the third Test at Bridgetown.

Whether it is 3-1, 2-1, 1-1 or 2-2, as long as exciting cricket is played out, everyone wins.



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/3nfLiDQ

Saturday, January 2, 2021

New Books – An Overview for January 2021

Despite the global pandemic and the disruption that has brought with it there have still been cricket books appearing and, perhaps, the various lockdowns that have affected the major cricket playing nations have led to many more being written. Will they see the light of day? Hopefully at some point they will all be published in some form or other, but normal service seems unlikely to return for some time yet.

The traditional major publishers seem to be rather losing interest in cricket, and at this stage I can find only one title due from any of them. In 2019 Allen & Unwin published Vic Marks’ acclaimed autobiography, Original Spin, and two years on they are showcasing Marks’ talents as a writer once more with a collection of essays from the recently retired Guardian cricket correspondent. Late Cut: Musings on Cricket is due in June.

In recent years sports specialists Pitch have been the most productive publishing house in the UK and they have an interesting selection of books due in the first few months of next year the first of which is due to appear this month. Sachin and Azhar at Cape Town has been written by Arunabha Sengupta and Abhishek Mukherjee. The backdrop is an exhilarating partnership between the two Indian batsmen in the Newlands Test in 1997 but the book as a whole is rather more discursive, representing a wide ranging discussion between its two authors, both of whose interests extend well beyond the boundary rope.

March will see Pitch publish Bails and Boardrooms, the autobiography of David Nash. A wicketkeeper batsman for Middlesex between 1997 and 2009 Nash, it would seem, in common with a number of his contemporaries, had more than his fair share of mental health problems. Nash’s story will be particularly interesting as he seems to have overcome his troubles, or perhaps turned them to his advantage, as he has built up a very successful business since leaving the game.

Also due in March is a second book from Thomas Blow who, last year, gave us The Honorary Tyke. Just to show he does not have a northern bias Blow has written Kings in Waiting, a book on the subject of Somerset cricket and the West Country county’s succession of near misses in recent years as they have striven to finally bring a first County Championship to Taunton – this year maybe?

There will doubtless be an element of romance in Pitch’s next title, Do They Play Cricket in Ireland? by David Townsend, which is due in April. The book promises to chart the huge strides made by the Irish over the last quarter of a century, the shocks they have meted out in the game’s shorter formats and their promising start to life as a Test nation. On that basis there will not, sadly, be an account of that remarkable day at Sion Mills in 1969, but then a full history of the game on the Emerald Isle would have to be a weighty tome indeed.

And finally from Pitch, for the first half of 2021, is possibly the most interesting of all; And Bring The Darkness Home: The Tony Dell Story by Greg Milam. Dell was an Australian pace bowler who was, twice, capped by his country in the early 1970s. Ultimately however it is once again mental health issues that will be the focal point of the book. Uniquely amongst top class cricketers Dell was a veteran of the Vietnam War, although it would not be until he got into his 60s that, with a diagnosis of PTSD, he became fully aware of the scars his involvement had left.

Amongst the niche publishers the New Year will see a new book from Boundary Books, although not the one I expected. A monograph/tribute to David Rayvern Allen has been planned for some time, and owner Mike Down recognises that it is something he must do, but we will have to wait a little longer for that. What he is doing however is publishing a new book by Tony Laughton on the subject of Albert Craig, The Surrey Poet. Laughton’s biography of Craig was The Mac’s first five star book, and that was followed up by a bibliography that I reviewed here. In the succeeding years a good deal more has been discovered and the new publication is, effectively, an exercise in presenting that new information.

Whilst on the subject of Boundary Books I will mention one other title, not because they have published it, but because they are the only source of this book that I am aware of. A Tour but for The War is a book about the England tour of the sub-continent that would have taken place in 1939/40 had the Second World War not put paid to the plans of the BCII and MCC. The book is written by Guy Curry, he of a famous collection of cricket books that was auctioned off with propitious timing in advance of the financial crash of 2008. The somewhat esoteric choice of subject matter is explained by the fact that Guy’s maternal grandfather, Flight Lieutenant AJ Holmes, was the man selected to lead the MCC tourists. The book has just been self published, very professionally indeed, in a limited edition of 111 copies.

Red Rose Books have a number of books and booklets due in the New Year. Martin Tebay intends to keep going with the Red Rose Records series that I have much enjoyed, but he does intend to, no doubt on the principle that you should always leave your audience wanting more, end that after reaching volume eleven – so there will be five more. Martin also expects to publish an account of Lancashire’s successful 1904 County Championship campaign. From other writers I understand that a biography of Jack Crossland from the pen of Stuart Brodkin will appear and that Gerry Wostenholme’s look at the cricketing rivalry between Brazil and Argentina in the 1920s is also expected. Other probables are biographical works on Frank Hayes, Geoff ‘Noddy’ Pullar and Albert Hornby, the latter being the son of the better known ‘Monkey’ Hornby. Albert led Lancashire between 1908 and 1914 albeit, unlike his father, he never played Test cricket.

In Lancashire we are fortunate to have two small publishers with a special interest in the Red Rose and Max Books have two titles due for the first half of 2021. One is on the subject of Hornby Senior, and is in a scrapbook type format and runs to more than 300 pages. It will cover the whole of Hornby’s life and not just his cricket and is written by two eminent local historians. The second, and like the Hornby this will appear in a limited edition, is Brian Bearshaw’s Diary of a Journalist, which will cover the summers of 1964 and 1965, one of the most turbulent periods in Lancashire’s history.

Whilst on the subject of Max Books I should also mention its soulmate, the Neville Cardus Archive. The archive has two new publications in the course of preparation those being firstly a bibliography of Sir Neville’s work, and also Cardus in an Australian Light which, as the title suggests, will concentrate on Sir Neville’s experiences with Australians, both in England and on his visits downunder, the longest of which lasted for the duration of World War Two.

One of the consequences of the Covid-19 restrictions is that those charged with the task of running the Sussex Cricket Museum have been unable to access their premises, so all previously announced plans are on hold. When, and I hope it is very soon, they are able to pick up the threads of their publishing programme, I am looking forward to a steady flow of the titles that have previously been announced but have yet to appear. In addition I understand that plans to publish a biography of Tommy Cook are well advanced. Cook was a stalwart of the county’s batting between the wars. In addition he was a centre forward with Brighton and Hove Albion and later Bristol Rovers who was, in 1925, capped once by England. Tragically he took his own life in 1950.

Roger Heavens has recently completed the next volume in his long standing project to make available all of Arthur Haygarth’s unpublished work. He is now up to Volume 22 of the monumental Scores and Biographies, the seventh ‘new’ volume he has published. This one will appear in the New Year, and covers the 1885 season.

The only other county that I know for sure is planning something is Worcestershire. Tim Jones of the county’s Heritage Group has written a variation on the theme of a Who’s Who. For his project he has looked only at the 52 men who have appeared in First Class matches for the county, but whose appearances did not include any in the County Championship, as a result of which the 52 were not included when numbers were recently allocated retrospectively to all who had appeared in the Championship. Of the 17 who survive all but one have shared their stories with Jones, as have the families of many of those now deceased, so the book should be an interesting read.

And what of our self publishers? There is good news here in that Philip Paine has almost completed the first of his monographs on the subject of lesser known England cricketers of the dim and distant past. The first will be around 150 pages on one Test man Sandford Schultz. Clearly a book of that length is rather more than a monograph, but Paine is unwilling to describe it as a biography as, despite his tracking down much information on his subject significant gaps remain.

Occasional missives from Dave Battersby with copies of his latest monographs have been a considerable pleasure in recent years and I understand that the next two are in the course of preparation. The first revisits one of his 2020 publications, The Tours of the Pakistan Eaglets to the UK in the 1950s.  This year’s model will include a good deal of new information that has come to light on those tours as well as, as I predicted, a look at the Eaglets’ final tour in 1963. The second will look at a man whose name will be unfamiliar to many, but anyone who regularly watched televised cricket in 1978 and 1979 will remember Glamorgan’s South African overseas player, Peter Swart.

Just a few weeks ago an excellent piece of research appeared from Adrian Gault on the life of James Southerton. Extending that research Gault’s next book will reproduce in full the reports that Southerton sent home from Australia in 1876/77 for the English press. These reports will be accompanied by Gault’s annotations on the people the tourists met, the incidents referenced, and the places visited. He has also located a number of photographs to accompany the text.

After so many years of eagerly awaiting news of the activities of Fairfield Books it does rather go against the grain to treat Stephen Chalke as a self publisher, although that is precisely what he has become as he revises and republishes One More Run, one of the earliest Fairfield ventures. Stephen is being a little coy about future activities but is determined to see into print a second volume of reminiscences from former Hampshire batsman Alan ‘Punchy’ Rayment which, sadly, remained unfinished when Punchy, aged 91, passed away in October last year. Stephen also admits to having a role in the preparation of a forthcoming autobiography from the former Surrey, Gloucestershire, Sussex and Surrey (again!) all-rounder Roger Knight.

By way of a digression I should add that in addition to Stephen himself still appearing in this piece so to do Fairfield, now under the stewardship of TriNorth Limited. Their first book, Golden Summers, has just appeared and I am told they expect there to be a couple more to follow in the coming months. I know not what the subjects might be, but hope that perhaps one is the retrospective account of the 1953/54 England tour of West Indies that was not quite ready before Stephen handed over the reins.

Regular readers of our reviews will be aware that recent weeks have seen the launch by Richard Miller of a new series of booklets reproducing material about Scottish cricket from the dim and distant past. We have already reviewed the first three, here, here and here, and there are three more in the first ‘batch’, their subjects being Fifty Years of Angus Cricket, Nine Inch Derbies 1881-1934 and Notable Cricketers of Tayside. There are also another half dozen in the course of preparation and due soon those being on the subjects of cricket in Aberdeenshire, the Perthshire and Brechin Clubs, the game in Leith, a profile of CT Mannes and a collection of profiles from The Scottish Referee.

Moving from Scotland to Australia what is the news from the Cricket Publishing Company? Recent weeks have the release of Victor Trumper, The Pupil and the Master and, whilst on the theme of Trumper, a beautifully produced re-publication of an article on the great man that was written by teammate Monty Noble. My copy of I Once Knew A Man has yet to arrive from the antipodes and, as I understand it consists of only a dozen or so pages, is likely on a price per page basis to be my most expensive ever purchase. It will be reviewed as soon as the opportunity arises.

As for next year Mr Cardwell still has as many plates spinning as ever but sources suggest that there are at least five titles that might appear in the next few months. The most likely are a book about New Zealander Doug Freeman by Mr Cardwell himself, whose story promises to be an interesting one. Capped twice by New Zealand in 1933 as a schoolboy Freeman had played his final First Class match before his twentieth birthday. The other four favourites to make it into print are a history of the St George club in Sydney from Mr Cardwell and Nathan Anderson (Brian Booth’s grandson), a book on First Class cricketers who have represented the Glenelg club from David Jenkins, a collection of essays from Australian cricket lover and former politician Rodney Cavalier, and a biography of Bert Kortlang, a man who was very much more than a cricketer, from the pen of Rob Franks.

The above aside there are always a few outside bets with the CPC. This time they are a biography of Frank Ward from Mr Cardwell, a book intriguingly titled Every Picture Tells A Story, which is a collaboration between Mr Cardwell and John Benaud, and I am still hopeful that the autobiography of Jack D’Arcy, the New Zealand batsman who toured England in 1958 before going on to a highly successful career in business, will appear before too long. One previously mentioned that we won’t, sadly, be seeing in the foreseeable future is Mr Cardwell’s biography of Jim Burke, but as partial recompense another issue of Between Wickets may appear.

In other news from Australia the New Year will see an autobiography from Jack Potter published by Ken Piesse in his Nostalgia series. Potter was a superb all-round sportsman and a fine batsman for Victoria in the late 1950s and early 1960s who came as close as is possible to get to a Test place without actually winning one when he was twelfth man at the MCG in 1963/64. Elsewhere in Australia I understand that a biography of the last Invincible, Neil Harvey, is due from the pen of Ashley Mallett, and not before time. I am also led to believe that a biography of Vic Richardson is ready for publication as well. I should also mention another book that has appeared, Mike Sexton’s excellent celebration of Barry Richards’ 1970/71 Sheffield Shield campaign, The Summer of Barry.

The only tour book of the year is due from Australia, from multiple award winning author Geoff Lemon. Steve Smith’s Men received much acclaim on publication, and The Comeback Summer takes a considered look at the 2019 English summer and the returns of Steve Smith after ‘Sandpapergate’ and Ben Stokes after missing the preceding Ashes series as a result of his having unfinished business in the Bristol Crown Court.

Regular readers may recall from last June my review of the sumptuous production that was Victor Trumper and the Golden Age of Australian Cricket by the two Peters, Lloyd and Schofield. That one sold out in the blink of an eye, and doubtless their next venture, due I believe this month, will do likewise. The new one is a very similar exercise concerning that other Australian immortal Sir Donald Bradman and will doubtless be available just as fleetingly. As I type this piece I understand that yet another such volume is planned. The details are a little elusive but it sounds like the subject may be Bradman again, the forthcoming volume covering only the years up to World War Two.

I had hoped there might be a good crop of books from the sub-continent this year, but sadly it seems not. One has appeared recently, The Hitman: The Rohit Sharma Story by Vijay Lokapally, but that apart all I am aware of at this stage are a couple of other titles due from Gulu Ezekiel. The first is likely to be My Cricket Hero, in which Gulu combines an essay on his personal hero, Ekki Solkar, with eleven similar pieces by eleven other writers. Gulu is also working on a fifth edition of his biography of MS Dhoni as well as another book, details of which I regret I am unable to disclose at this stage. Sadly what he is not currently engaged on is working on a biography/monograph of 1950s all-rounder Dattu Phadkar, but I will keep on nagging.

The ACS have some interesting looking books due in the first half of the year. One will, of course, be their flagship International Cricket Yearbook 2021, albeit this complete record of a year’s cricket will doubtless be somewhat slimmer than usual. Unlike this writer, who hopes the results of his recent efforts at achieving a BMI of 25 will be permanent, it is to be hoped that by 2022 the yearbook will have its normal girth restored. The 2021 volume is due in February and in May there will be another essentially statistical volume, Hard to Get Scores Volume 8: Pakistan 1984/85 to 1986/87.

Of wider popular appeal should be the two new additions to each of the Cricket Witness and Lives in Cricket in series. In the former February will see the release of  Fly at a Higher Game by Andrew Hignell, which will tell the story of Glamorgan’s elevation to the County Championship a century ago and of Neath solicitor TAL Whittington, the man whose efforts off the field led to this historic event. May will then see the appearance of Cricket in a Multicultural Society : A History of Cricket Malaysia by Roy Morgan, an important new book which will draw out social and racial themes and the effect of colonialism on the game in Malaysia.

As for the Lives in Cricket series the long awaited (by me anyway) story of Derbyshire’s Bill Bestwick will appear: Bestwick famously once opened the county’s bowling in partnership with his son, Robert, and all told took 1,457 First Class wickets despite taking a mid career break. He took an all-ten at the age of 46, was a Test umpire, and outside the game was charged and acquitted of homicide. Written by Mick Pope the book will appear in February. May’s addition to the series will be on the subject of Canon Frank Gillingham. Tony Bradbury will tell the story of one of the very few twentieth century cricketers who also had a full clerical career, and surely the only one who was born in Japan and died in Monaco. A  batsman good enough to average more than 30 and record 19 centuries over a career lasting a quarter of a century Gillingham might have captained Essex if he had been able to play full time.

From Malaysia I move on to Latin America and the publication, hopefully in May, of a substantial history of the game on that continent by James Coyne and Tim Abraham. There was a time, essentially between the wars, when the game had quite a stronghold there, particularly in Argentina, and Evita Burned Down Our Pavilion: A Cricket Odyssey through Latin America, promises to be the definitive account of cricket in the region.

A book I am particularly looking forward to is a self-published biography of David Larter by Richard Sayer. As a preliminary point self-publication can and usually does, for obvious reasons, often result in books being poorly presented. If nothing else I am sure, having had the pleasurable experience of reading an earlier book of Sayer’s, that he has on board a designer with real flair, and that accordingly this one will be an attractive finished product. Nonetheless it remains the case with such books that the quality of the narrative is the most important aspect of them. Larter was a 6’5” Scottish born fast bowler whose career was to all intents and purposes over at 25 because of persistent injury problems. Despite that a career record of 666 wickets at less than 20 runs each is hugely impressive and Larter’s ten Tests brought a decent reward as well. Personally I never saw Larter bowl, but as a child my father would speak of his mercurial talents in hushed and reverential tones whenever England were struggling for a breakthrough, hence my welcoming the opportunity to learn more about him.

Whilst on the subject of England cricketers born in Scotland I have recently learnt that in July a biography of Mike Denness appeared, self-published by Andrew Bee via Amazon. To date Mike Denness is the only England captain I have ever spoken to and that was when I was doing a bit of research into Dennis Amiss’ monumental unbeaten 262 in the Caribbean in 1974. That Denness chose to go to the trouble of returning my call and to talk to me for twenty minutes at a time when (unknown to me I hasten to add) he had only a fortnight before cancer claimed him always struck me as the behaviour of a true gentleman, whatever that word really means. I am still waiting for Amazon to deliver my copy of The Tale of the Scottish Dexter but as soon as they do it will go straight to the top of the ‘to read’ pile and a review will follow. This also seems to be a good point at which to mention that the previously announced Amiss autobiography, Not Out at the Close of Play, now due to appear on 1 March.

In September another book from David ‘Bumble’ Lloyd appeared, Simply the Best, which contains our national treasure’s take on the greatest of his time. Another book on a not dissimilar theme is due next May, Immortals of English Cricket by Bill Ricquier, a man who I believe, as well as being a cricket writer, is also an expert on Singapore land law. Ricquier’s book, which will doubtless be written in a very different style from Lloyd’s, contains essays on the eleven men he selects for an all-time England side and will see, amongst others, Jack Hobbs rubbing shoulders with Jimmy Anderson. Cricketing Lives: A Characterful History from Pitch to Page sounds as if it may be similar again, although the publisher’s blurb for Richard Thomas’ book, also due in May, suggests it is more of a history of the game than a collection of pen portraits.

And finally, May should see the appearance of a new book from Jon Hotten, The Elements of Cricket, which has the most impressive publisher’s blurb I have ever seen. It is described as a cricket book unlike any other published before, an extraordinary, eccentric guide and charming visual representation of the game, from the weather and wood that make it possible to the achievements of its greatest and most famous players.

The book is divided into the three parts that make up the fundamental elements of cricket: bat, ball and field. Their harmony produces cricket’s unique environment; their centuries’ long conflict provides its innovation, adaptability and vast psychological hinterland. These sections unite to map out in a completely original way the story of the sport that began as a country pursuit and is now followed by billions across the world.



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/3513aM7