Sunday, February 28, 2021

‘Gatt’

Mike Gatting was 18 when he made his First Class debut for Middlesex. He was always going to be a professional sportsman and, once it became clear he wasn’t going to be quite good enough to make a career as a goalkeeper it was time to concentrate on cricket. Younger brother Steve, also a useful cricketer, did make a career in football for Arsenal and Brighton, and Steve’s son Joe played both sports professionally albeit not at the same time, beginning as a striker with Brighton and, when opportunities there were limited, going on to play as a batsman for Sussex and Hampshire without ever suggesting he was as good as his famous uncle.

A powerful forcing right handed batsman Gatting was highly rated from the start. He was called into an England squad for the first time as a twenty year old when he was taken to Pakistan and New Zealand. He played a single Test in each series, achieving nothing of note. Such was his consistency at county level that over the next seven years Gatting played in 30 Tests for England, but with a highest score of just 81 and an average of 23.83. Against the formidable 1980 West Indians he played in four of the five Tests, and then the centenary Test against Australia. He got plenty of starts, and averaged 29.37, but his highest score was 56. In the famous summer of 1981 he reached fifty four times, but never passed 59. A tendency to pad up to balls that were too straight for taking that risk against and to play the then highly unusual reverse sweep could on occasion exasperate.

When he was dismissed twice by Malcolm Marshall for 1 and 29 in the Lord’s Test of 1984 Gatting believed he had run out of chances. A little despondent he spent some time in the nets with a couple of Middlesex legends, Gubby Allen and Don Bennett, and ironed out a few technical issues. An eye-catching 258 against Somerset followed and with England skipper David Gower keen to have him in India he got another chance on the 1984/85 trip. This time Gatting did take his opportunity, and spectacularly so, making a first Test hundred in the first Test, a double in the fourth and averaging 95.83.

The new confident Gatting returned to face Australia in the 1985 Ashes and carried on where he had left off in India. His average dropped, but only slightly to 87.83. As England won a six match series 3-1 Gatting failed to contribute at least a half century in all but the final Test. He was now the finished article as an international batsman and looking forward to taking on the West Indies in the Caribbean the following winter.

Sadly the tour was a difficult one for Gatting and trouble soon found him. Marshall described the pitch as uneven. Ian Botham preferred the word corrugated. Either way the quality of the wicket at Sabina Park in Kingston for the first ODI of the tour left a good deal to be desired and West Indies’ decision to field first after winning the toss was no surprise. Tim Robinson and David Gower were both dismissed without scoring before Graham Gooch and Gatting tried to dig in. Gatting had eked ten runs out of 37 deliveries when disaster struck. Seeing a chance for a hook Gatting went for a Marshall bouncer and missed. The ball went from glove to nose and onto the stumps. A dazed and confused Gatting then trod on his wicket before being helped from the field.

The nose was shattered and surgery required. Doctors at the hospital Gatting was taken to were concerned that slivers of bone may have been pushed into the brain. The man himself was fretting because of the delay, concerned at when he might be able to resume his innings. No one could be bothered to explain to him that he was out anyway. After an hour or so he was able to go back to the ground and, with Gatting’s main property to get back out in the middle only then was the news relayed to him – there followed an expletive or two from a frustrated Gatting.

A few days later a clearly damaged Gatting was back at Heathrow being famously asked by a waiting reporter where the ball had him. His response to one of the most stupid questions ever asked was a model of restraint, something that could not always be said of Gatting. Most men in his position would have sat out the rest of the winter at home, but less than a month later Gatting was back in the Caribbean looking to take his place in the side for the third Test. He started well in the warm up, but then was dismissed for 36. Vibert Greene, not the fastest of West Indian quick bowlers but certainly slippery on his day, broke his finger and he missed the second innings and, of course, the Test.

Surely this time Gatting would give the tour up as a bad job? In fact no. Another month on and Gatting lined up in the side in Antigua. He couldn’t stop England sliding to a second successive 5-0 reverse but did win the psychological battle with Marshall, or perhaps more realistically with himself, when the inevitable bouncer that Maco gave him first up was pulled away for a couple of runs.

Gatting’s reward for his courage was the poisoned chalice of the England captaincy. After defeat in the first Test against India in 1986 the selectors lost patience with Gower and replaced him with Gatting. He lost his first Test in charge, but an unbeaten 183 prevented India winning the third Test, and although the following series against New Zealand was also lost there was another century for Gatting.

The choice of Gatting for the England job was an obvious one. He had been leading Middlesex since 1983 and whilst he may have inherited a strong and successful side from Mike Brearley the fact that in his first three seasons in charge the side were second, third and first in the County Championship showed his credentials, although a slip to twelfth by an aging side in 1986 coupled with England’s problems suggested he may have  been running out of ideas.

England under Gatting were not expected to do well in Australia in 1986/87. They started the tour badly and were beaten by Queensland and struggled against Western Australia on the eve of the first Test, causing journalist Martin Johnson to famously write; There are only three things wrong with this England team. They can’t bat, can’t bowl and can’t field. They were words which seemed to galvanise the resolve of the team who went on to deservedly win the series 2-1. Gatting would inevitably have played his part in creating the team spirit that all the players recognised played a major role in their success, and his selfless decision to take on the problematic number three berth in the first Test, and his success there after Chris Broad’s early dismissal, was certainly a case of Leading From The Front, the title he chose for an autobiography that was published a couple of years later.

Unfortunately for Gatting that was the end of his success as England’s captain. The following summer Pakistan visited England and, for the first time, won a series in England. The home side did not play well, although Gatting himself, in a five match series, scored 445 runs at an average of 63.57 to lead the England averages by a distance.

The next series for Gatting was in Pakistan and resulted in defeat again. It was a series that might have been squared had so much time not been taken out of the second Test as a result of Gatting’s notorious on field spat with umpire Shakoor Rana. Gatting should of course have turned the other cheek, but as the modest punishment he received for the incident amply demonstrated the incident did no credit to Rana either, and Gatting was at his wit’s end with the undoubtedly poor quality of the umpiring, and his anger at being called a ****ing cheating **** by Rana is understandable.

From Pakistan England travelled to Australia for the one off Bicentennial Test which was followed by a three Test series in New Zealand. All four Tests were drawn and there was continued grumbling about the quality of the umpiring. There were not many runs for Gatting but by the end of the tour he certainly still had the loyalty of his team and, although there were problems in the early part of the trip, he also seemed to have put behind him the spectre of what had happened at Faisalabad.

The test for England in 1988 was as tough as they come, West Indies, and after ten successive defeats against the men in maroon avoiding defeat was the first objective. The series began at Trent Bridge with some optimism of better times ahead for England after Gatting had led them to a 3-0 clean sweep in the ODI series. Gatting had the courage to bat first after winning the toss, but in conceding a first innings deficit of 203 England’s middle order, Gatting included, let the side down.  However there was some intervention by the weather and two excellent innings from Gooch and Gower and a determined one from the captain himself when England went back out made sure a draw was comfortably achieved in the end.

The second Test was, as per tradition, scheduled for Lord’s, but in the end Gatting did not play. After the Trent Bridge match a story appeared in a Sunday newspaper reporting that he had taken a waitress to his room during the Trent Bridge match. With some in the corridors of power no doubt still irked by events in Pakistan there was no sympathy shown for Gatting who lost the captaincy to county teammate John Emburey and his place in the side to Martyn Moxon.

England lost the match at Lord’s and, more importantly, Gooch to injury. For the third Test Moxon moved up the order to open in place of Gooch and Gatting was called back. He scored 0 and 4, England were hammered and Gatting was out of the side again. It is unlikely, given the comprehensive nature of two more defeats, that he was troubled unduly by his omission. On the positive side his fortunes at Middlesex improved as the county, after being sixteenth in 1987, rose up to seventh in the Championship, and lifted the Nat West Bank Trophy, then the showpiece of the List A summer.

In 1988/89 England were due to visit India, a tour that did not happen because the Indian government refused to issue visas to eight of the England side, including skipper Gooch, all of whom were on a UN blacklist because of their past links with South Africa.

In the following summer England welcomed Allan Border’s Australians for the first Ashes series since the Gatting led victory of 1986/87. There was a new broom at the top, Ted Dexter having replaced Peter May as Chairman of Selectors, and his comparison of Gooch to a wet fish made clear his views on the captaincy. He wanted to reinstate Gatting and told him as much in March. In the event a fellow selector, Ossie Wheatley, made it clear to Dexter that Gatting was not an acceptable appointment, and in the end the job went, as a compromise, back to Gower.

Meanwhile, on the other side of the world and after a hiatus of three years since the last Australian visit, South Africa were looking to recruit an England side for a rebel tour. For a long time they lacked a captain but, his great loyalty stretched to breaking point by the way he had been treated, in the end Gatting accepted the job and was unveiled as one of the sixteen tourists on the final day of the fourth Test, in which Australia’s superiority over England had been confirmed as they took an unassailable 3-0 lead in a six match series they eventually took 4-0. Gatting had been selected for the second Test, scored 0 and 22 and then withdrew from the third because of a family bereavement. By that time the rules were clear. The tourists would be banned from officially sanctioned international cricket for the duration of their contracts with SACU (two years) and for a further five years after that so, at 32, Gatting was effectively bringing down the curtain on his Test career.

Having played international cricket throughout the late 1970s and the 1980s Gatting could not have been ignorant of the issues at stake, although he might have been surprised at just how strong public opinion in England was against the visit. What he cannot have known at the time he accepted Ali Bacher’s offer, was that the laws in South Africa that criminalised political demonstrations were to be abolished in September of 1989 and that accordingly things would be just as difficult when his side actually arrived. Despite the winds of change blowing through the country and evidenced by that change in the law the anti-apartheid movements were still united in their opposition to the rebel tour going ahead.

The tour, which began in January 1990, was a mistake and in the end a second ‘Test’ match was cancelled. The cricket was of no consequence but, if it were needed, there was one very vivid demonstration of Gatting’s courage. The third fixture of the tour was a three day match in Pietermaritzburg. There was a demonstration and those protesting wanted to present Gatting with a petition. He could, naturally, have stayed put in the pavilion and gone nowhere near the baying crowd. Instead he decided to go out and accept the petition, walking about 150 yards through the throng and back again in order to do so. Facing Marshall on a dodgy track at Sabina Park must, for once, have seemed like the proverbial walk in the park.

Of the seventeen days of ‘International’ cricket that were scheduled for the trip only seven were played before the cancellation, there being real concerns for the safety of the tourists in the febrile atmosphere in the country. The physical danger might not have been present back in England but the hostility was undimmed ,the Daily Mirror greeting the tourists with; Mike Gatting and his jackals of cricket are coming home early with their bats between their legs. Having disgraced their country and their sport it is only fitting that they should be abandoned by the South Africa to which they sold their reputations. Behind them in South Africa the pace of change was such that in a little over a year’s time the country was readmitted to the ICC.

The ban on Gatting stood until 1992 when it was relaxed in time for him to be chosen to tour India under Gooch’s leadership. In his three summers away from the game he had scored heavily and consistently for Middlesex and in 1991 and 1992 reached 2,000 runs. In the first of those summers he was the leading Englishman in the averages, and second only to Gooch in 1992, so on form alone his selection was fully merited.

The tour was not a happy one. England were well beaten in all three Tests in India and also managed to lose the only Test in Sri Lanka. There was an outcry in England when the party was chosen, not because of the inclusion of Gatting, but because of the omission of Gower, supposedly on grounds of age notwithstanding that he was the same age as Gatting and four years younger than Gooch or Emburey. Gatting did not excel with the bat in India but, averaging 36.50, only Graeme Hick headed him in the averages.

A winter such as they had just had was far from ideal preparation for another visit from the powerful Australian side of 1993 and it is perhaps a little unfortunate for Gatting that the best remembered moment of his career came in the first innings of the first Test when he became the victim of Shane Warne’s ball of the century, his first delivery in the Ashes and a superb leg break that pitched outside Gatting’s leg stump before hitting the top of the non-plussed batsman’s off stump. At the time he had scored just four, and he made only 23 second time round, but it was enough to keep his place.

In the second innings at Lord’s Gatting scored 59, so was perhaps unlucky not to get another chance but he was 36 and not so mobile as he once had been. His reputation as a fine player of spin had also been tarnished by Warne’s delivery and, perhaps, the more so in the first innings at Lord’s when he was bowled ‘through the gate’ for five by off spinner Tim May. There was no Gatting in the West Indies that winter or against South Africa or New Zealand in 1994 and it seemed his international career must be over.

England were now led by Michael Atherton, no fan of the old guard whose verdict on Gatting was; Too old, liability in the field, recent Test record not good, another left hander needed to counter Warne. It was therefore a major surprise when, even though they had been the second and third placed Englishmen in the First Class averages in 1994, both Gooch and Gatting (41 and 37 respectively) were included in the party for Australia in 1994/95, the more so that they were the only two in a party that suffered more than most with injury that played in all five Tests.

There is no doubt that Gatting struggled and in the two heavy defeats that England suffered in the first two Tests he scored 10,13,9, and 25. England’s fortunes picked up in the third match and they had much the better of a draw but, out for nought in his only innings, Gatting was told his tour was done. He only played in the fourth Test because England were down to just eleven fit men, something which made their subsequent victory all the more surprising.

Atherton won the toss and chose to bat and Gatting came in on Gooch’s dismissal at 93. He was last out almost seven hours later for 117, his tenth and last Test century, seven and a half years after the ninth. It was far from the flowing stroke play of Gatting at his belligerent best, but was absolutely crucial. He was not without luck, bowled by Craig McDermott from a no ball on 19, and his anxiety was such that it took him 77 minutes to get through the nineties. No doubt drained Gatting was out for a duck in the second innings, but he had made his contribution . Before the final match of the series at the WACA Gatting and Gooch both announced their retirements from Test cricket. It was a heavy defeat and, with 0 and 8, Gatting left the international arena quietly. His final record was a total of 4,409 runs in 79 Tests at 35.55, figures that were not a true reflection of his ability.

By now a veteran Gatting played on for Middlesex for another four summers before finally retiring at the end of the 1998 season. He remained a force and even in that last summer comfortably made his 1,000 runs. Against Essex at Southgate at the end of June he scored 241, in the course of which he and Justin Langer added a record Middlesex opening stand of 372 prompting the Australian to observe; Without exception he still works as hard as anyone in the team, his technique is outstanding and he obviously has a great love and passion for the game of cricket.

After retirement from playing Gatting, now 63, has stayed in the world of cricket. He has served in various coaching and administrative capacities as well as working in the media. In 2013 he was President of the MCC and, by all accounts, remains one of the great trenchermen the game has produced. Langer’s account in his most recent autobiography of a day he took on Gatting in an eating contest is the best illustration of his talents in that respect, as well as demonstrating Langer’s willingness to take on a challenge even when victory is clearly beyond him.



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/2NLmvvA

Saturday, February 27, 2021

IPL Auction 2021 – CW Analysis

Keerthivarman reviews the results of the IPL Auction that was held in Chennai on 18th Feb for the 2021 edition and gives his analysis of how every team went.

The IPL is scheduled to be played across April and May with this year’s edition to be played in India. The UAE is not being considered as a backup venue.

 

Team: Chennai Super Kings

Best Starting XI

  • Faf du Plessis (O)
  • Jagadeesan
  • Suresh Raina
  • Ambati Rayudu
  • S. Dhoni (C & WK)
  • Ravindra Jadeja
  • Moeen Ali (O)
  • Sam Curran (O)
  • Deepak Chahar
  • Shardul Thakur
  • Imran Tahir (O)

What went wrong in 2020?

  • Lack of Quickfire start with the bat
  • Wicketless phase for spinners in the middle overs
  • The perfect death bowler
  • The lack of quality backups

What’s better than in 2020?

The team performed well towards the end of the league stages, showing that they had the potent to win games. Now the line-up is in a good mix with left-right combination throughout the line-up. They also bat deep till 10 and they have players to float across the order.

They also have the variety in the spin department with addition of two off spinners to the squad and they can bat and do the new ball duties too. Now they can field an offie, left arm spinner and a wrist spinner.

If things goes wrong like last year with the availability of key players, still they have good bench so that the void isn’t as large as last year with experienced players like Uthappa, Pujara and Bravo finding it difficult to get in the starting XI.

Still a grey area!

With most of the problems being resolved, the death bowling is still a concern for CSK. With Bravo not at his best and ageing too, there is a lack of quality death bowler. With Chahar being a premium new ball bowler, Thakur not going to be selected on all the occasions and Curran who is a lot younger, CSK might find it tougher in the end overs.

The best buy of the Auction

Moeen Ali: With CSK going hardly on Maxwell and losing it in the end put a huge pressure on the team management to sign an off spinner with Harbhajan Singh released. Moeen Ali also brings in something with the bat which was evident with the innings at Chennai. He can bat anywhere in the order which adds a cushion for the team.

 Team: Mumbai Indians

Best Starting XI

  • Quinton de Kock (O) (WK)
  • Rohit Sharma (C)
  • Suryakumar Yadav
  • Ishan Kishan
  • Krunal Pandya
  • Hardik Pandya
  • Kieron Pollard (O)
  • Nathan Coulter-Nile (O)
  • Trent Boult (O)
  • Rahul Chahar
  • Jasprit Bumrah

What went wrong in 2020?

  • Lack of Quality Spinners
  • Lack of Quality Back-up options

What’s better than in 2020?

Having released 3 foreign pacers, MI needed someone to back up Boult in the overseas pace department, they managed to get back Nathan Coulter-Nile for a lower price to strengthen the pace bowling department and the addition of Piyush Chawla gives the cushion for them with Rahul Chahar and Krunal Pandya struggling in the UAE tracks.

Still a grey area!

With Hardik not sure in the bowling front and Krunal struggling with the bat, an injury to a player in the top order will leave a great confusion in the starting XI. The back-up for Bumrah is also not up to the mark.

The best steal of the Auction

James Neesham- He brings in a great variety with bat and ball and provides a good back-up to Pollard. He was a steal considering snapping him at the base price of 50L and can fit in the line-up as a good pace bowling all-rounder.

Team: Royal Challengers Bangalore

Best Starting XI

  • Devdutt Padikkal
  • Josh Philippe (WK) (O)
  • Virat Kohli (C)
  • AB de Villiers (O)
  • Glenn Maxwell (O)
  • Washington Sundar
  • Harshal Patel
  • Kyle Jamieson (O)
  • Navdeep Saini
  • Mohammed Siraj
  • Yuzvendra Chahal

What went wrong in 2020?

  • Over Reliance on the top three batsmen
  • Lack of good middle order batsman and finisher
  • Lack of quality foreign pacer

What’s better than in 2020?

RCB have definitely addressed two of their major owes by signing Maxwell who provides the stability to the fragile middle order and can ease out some pressure off Kohli and de Villiers. With Phillipe having a good BBL, he will take over the keeping duties from ABD which gives ABD time to focus on his hitting alone. The signing of Jamieson adds the extra pace option who can also bat in the lower order. The addition of Sams and Christian gives more all-rounder options to the team.

Still a grey area!

The middle order looks strong with Maxwell, but after him are all-rounders who aren’t that much prolific with the bat which means a collapse at the top can have a huge impact on the team. Having spent heavily on Maxwell and Jamieson, the Indian contingent didn’t get a pump-up with 5 uncapped players signed at the base price which provides not enough bench strength to choose from.

The best buy of the Auction

Glenn Maxwell- Though they spent more than 14 CR on him, he will be a great addition to the powerful batting line-up, if they get a chance to play some games in Bangalore, the brutal hitting of Maxwell will come into the party. He also can chip in with the ball as evident from his performance in BBL this year.

 Team: Delhi Capitals

Best Starting XI

  • Shikhar Dhawan
  • Marcus Stoinis (O)
  • Steve Smith (O)
  • Shreyas Iyer (C)
  • Risbabh Pant (WK)
  • Axar Patel
  • Ravichandran Ashwin
  • Amit Mishra
  • Kagiso Rabada (O)
  • Anrich Nortje (O)
  • Ishant Sharma

What went wrong in 2020?

  • Lack of proper top order
  • Lack of quality back-ups
  • Lack of experienced foreign players

What’s better than in 2020?

Delhi Capitals possessed one of the best Indian batting line-up but the continuous failure of Shaw and Rahane at the top, injury to Pant hurt them badly and they had to change their line-ups to fit in players. Now with Stoinis going to his favourite spot at the top, the addition of Steve Smith gives Delhi a solid top order and experience in the thinktank too. The back-ups are sort out with the signing of Tom Curran and Umesh Yadav adding some cushion to the bowling combination.

Still a grey area!

Though they signed Sam Billings and Vishnu Vinod, still a quality back-up is missing for Pant. An injury to Mishra made a huge hole and the team management hasn’t added a good player to back-up the ageing leg spinner. Their bench is strong in the batting front so that they have to bench some good players.

The best steal of the Auction

Steve Smith- Delhi Capitals would’ve been the luckiest team by signing in a sensation player for just 2.25 Cr. Smith is a captaincy material who can bat in different gears accessing the situations and can help Iyer in the captaincy front as well. His recent form as an attacking player expected a heavier bidding from the franchises but Delhi snatched him at a cheaper price expecting to lift the trophy this time around.

 Team: Sunrisers Hyderabad

Best Starting XI

  • David Warner (O) (C)
  • Jonny Bairstow (O)
  • Kane Williamson (O)
  • Manish Pandey
  • Kedar Jadhav
  • Vijay Shankar
  • Rashid Khan (O)
  • Bhuvaneshwar Kumar
  • T Natarajan
  • Shahbaz Nadeem
  • Sandeep Sharma

What went wrong in 2020?

  • Lack of solid middle order
  • Lack of experienced Indian Batsmen
  • Lack of quality Indian spinners
  • Lack of Quality back-ups

 What’s better than in 2020?

The middle order problem has been sorted with the signing of Kedar Jadhav. Though he is not in rich vein form, he brings the stability to the fragile middle order and also adds some part time spin option too. They had improved the spin department with the addition of Afghan spinner Mujeeb Ur Rahman and Suchith for lesser money.

 Still a grey area!

SRH appears to be one of the strong teams with a good starting XI but they do rely on the foreign players with T20 specialists like Nabi, Mujeeb warming the bench. It is also hard to fit in Mitch Marsh who is a solid all-rounder but has to fall out on the overseas criteria. If they had got a quality Indian spinner would’ve made a solid unit on all grounds.

The best steal of the Auction

Mujeeb-Ur-Rahman- SRH signed their third Afghan player in the form of Mujeeb for just 1.5Cr, which is considered as a smart buy although his chances in this season will be limited. But he can form an able partner to Rashid and can be a good back-up for Rashid. Mujeeb can take the new ball too and his varieties are aplenty and given a chance he would waiting to prove a statement.

 Team: Kolkata Knight Riders

Best Starting XI

  • Shubman Gill
  • Rahul Tripathi
  • Nitish Rana
  • Eoin Morgan (O) (C)
  • Andre Russell (O)
  • Dinesh Karthik (WK)
  • Sunil Narine (O)
  • Lockie Ferguson (O)
  • Prasid Krishna
  • Shivam Mavi
  • Varun CV

What went wrong in 2020?

  • Lack of experienced Indian bowlers
  • Lack of proper back-ups for overseas all-rounders
  • Lack of back-up Indian Keeper

What’s better than in 2020?

KKR could be considered one of the teams who would have been satisfied with the auction having got more than what they desired to get. They found the perfect back up for Narine in form of Shakib and also Cutting as back-up for Russell. They also added depth in the spin bowling unit by adding Negi along with Harbhajan Singh. The addition of Jackson gives the team a back-up for an Indian keeper. Karun Nair’s inclusion gives a good cushion to the batting order.

Still a grey area!

Having flared well with the limited purse by signing good buys but they didn’t address their main problem of good pace bowlers mainly Indian seamers. The trio of Prasid, Mavi and Nagarkoti are relatively young and inexperienced and are also injury prone.

The best steal of the Auction

Shakib Al Hasan – With teams going on spin bowling all rounders heavily, Shakib is one of the best among the group. By signing him for a lesser amount of 3.2 Cr would be considered as a steal and he can be a perfect replacement for Narine who is being less effective with the bat and his new bowling action yielding him lesser returns.

 Team: Punjab Kings

Best Starting XI

  • KL Rahul (C & WK)
  • Mayank Agarwal
  • Dawid Malan (O)
  • Mandeep Singh
  • Nicholas Pooran (O)
  • Deepak Hooda
  • Jhye Richardson (O)
  • Chris Jordan (O)
  • Mohammed Shami
  • Murugan Ashwin
  • Ravi Bishnoi

 What went wrong in 2020?

  • Lack of All-rounders
  • Lack of good pacers
  • Lack of good middle order batsmen
  • A good starting XI

What’s better than in 2020?

The Kings made two great signings in the pace bowling contingent with the signing of Jhye Richardson and Riley Meredith for bigger amounts. Both the pacers had a breakout season in the BBL this year and fill a major void they had last season. They also made a remarkable signing of the number 1 T20I batsman Malan, who will be playing his first season in the grandest league. He will leading the middle order which was weak and conceded games last season and will be the cover for the Universal Boss. The signing of young Tamil Nadu sensation Shahrukh Khan is a great buy considering his recent exploits in the domestic T20 competition. They also signed good all rounders in Moises Henriques and Fabien Allen who will come in handy as the tournament progresses.

Still a grey area!

The Indian all rounder unit was weak before the auction and they haven’t done much in the auction too. Though they have signed Saxena and Saurabh Kumar, still the all rounders front looks a little weak still. They don’t have for good injury cover for the Indian players and the presence of abundant openers makes the batting heavy at the top and little weak as it goes down. The choice between Gayle and Malan will take a huge impact on the middle order while the later has an edge being a stable batsman than being a dasher at the top. They also don’t have any world class spinner with the spin duties being handled by the Indian duo of Murugan Ashwin and Bishnoi who are less in experience.

The best steal of the Auction

Dawid Malan – The number one T20I batsman was expected a huge bidding war by many franchises but surprisingly was sold for lesser amount. The Kings got him for just 1.5 Cr and he could provide the Punjab team the stability which was missing in the previous seasons. He can bat at any position in the batting order and go through gears when required.

 Team: Rajasthan Royals

Best Starting XI

  • Jos Buttler (O) (WK)
  • Ben Stokes (O)
  • Sanju Samson (C)
  • Yashasvi Jaiswal
  • Shivam Dube
  • Chris Morris (O)
  • Jofra Archer (O)
  • Rahul Tewetia
  • Shreyas Gopal
  • Kartik Tyagi
  • Jaydev Unadkat

What went wrong in 2020?

  • A proper batting order
  • Lack of Finishers
  • Lack of Indian bowlers and back-ups
  • A good finger spinner

What’s better than in 2020?

Having released their captain of 2020 season, Royals had to do a lot of rebuilding to the squad. They did the biggest buy in the IPL history by signing Morris for a record breaking 16.25 Cr who is a handy finisher and also good with the ball in the death overs too. They also signed Shivam Dube who fills in the finisher role which was left missing last season. They also strengthened the pace bowling unit by signing Mustafizur Rahman who forms a good foreign pacers unit with Archer, Tye and Morris. Royals known for unearthing fresh Indian talents has signed in good domestic talents in the form of Chetan Sakariya, Kuldip Singh and Akash Singh.

Still a grey area!

The best starting consists of as many as nine bowling options and bats till nine which makes the team an ideal T20 team. But the middle order lacks of a solid Indian batsman and they don’t have anyone in the back-ups to fill the void. Also, Royals failed to sign a good finger spinner this time around and have to back on young Jaiswal to do those duties.

The best steal of the Auction

Chetan Sakariya- As said above, the Royals are known to provide chances to young domestic talents and the signing of Sakariya makes him one of the talents to be exhibited this season hopefully. He is a good left arm pacer who bowls well at various stages of the game and he would make his IPL debut at some point this season and with the depth in the bowling, Royals would be expected to give him an extended run to  create a star for the future.



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/3ktcO0G

Sunday, February 21, 2021

That 90s Show

Decision Review System. X-Factor. Super Sub. Power Play. The Hundred. Power Surge. Twenty20. These innovations over the last twenty years and the changed preferences of the audience have turned cricket into something that was barely recognizable from the form in which it was played in the 90s and one can rest assured that it won’t look the same a decade or so in the future.

In fact, as we look back at the way cricket was back in the 90s it could be easy to say that the ‘experience’ of watching the game was so dissimilar to the present times that it could be equated to perhaps being in ‘Another Country’, the phrase taken from movie (1984) and play of the same name, signifying that a certain phase of life whether located in a particular time or physical location, has an independent existence and experience of its own. To make it relatable look back at events from your school or college lives, memories which can be remembered but never returned back to.

Cricket in the 90s can be looked back in a similar fashion, something so divorced from the present that to some it can look as if a ‘different’ sport was played back in the day. So, let’s take a look back keeping in mind things which were once deemed undetachable from the idea of cricket, but have since been discarded as the game has evolved.

  1. Tri-Series: The success of the Australian tri-series (inspired by the Kerry Packer years) was not without those envying its scale and festive atmosphere, and it was in the 90s that the potential of these One Day International carnivals was realized at a global scale. There were the Hero Cups, Centenary cups, Singer Trophies, Independence cups as nearly all the countries jumped into the tri-series bandwagon. This included England, who forsook the prim-and-proper Texaco Trophy affairs for the Natwest series featuring three sides.
    However, it was in the non-test playing venues that the Tri-Series thrived the most and helped in spreading the game of cricket. Sharjah, Morocco, Nairobi, Singapore, Toronto etc. all had their iterations of Champions trophies, Cricket challenges which allowed the locals to be enthralled by some high-quality cricket. Tendulkar’s Desert Storm, the 1996-97 Carlton and United Series in Australia won by Pakistan, the close finals of 1997-98 Carlton and United Series between South Africa and Australia, England winning the Sharjah cup in 1997, the 1996 Singer World Series were a few examples of successful triangular tournaments from the time.

On the downside, some saw it as meaningless extensions in the cricketing calendar which contributed to player fatigue and injuries with no real incentive, unlike say the World Cups. Irrespective of the same they continued well into early 2000s, with several attempts made to recreate the magic of these tournaments even as recently as mid to late 2010s in Sri Lanka, Australia and West Indies but it seems that with the arrival of Twenty20 leagues and crammed international calendar one would find it tough for these tournaments to sprinkle around the world again, barring those already seen in associate cricket.

  1. Where have the minnows gone? The term ‘Minnow’ is used to signify the up-and-coming cricketing nations, who are yet to prove themselves on the international arena. While it is true that there are better opportunities present today such as the Twenty20 international status for all cricket playing nations, welcome addition of Afghanistan and Ireland to test ranks and an ODI league, it has done little to change the exclusionary nature of the game.
    In the past, the opportunities given in the world cups, champions trophies and triangular series allowed the non-test playing nations a chance to take on the best, open doors to better opportunities and improve their cricketing skills. However, with the death of tri-series, trimming down of World tournaments and an international calendar biased against the associates, there is little opportunity for these sides to face up against the best.

In theory, they have their chance in the T20 World Cup but the fact remains that only the ‘best of the rest’ end up meeting the big guns in these tournaments. Even Afghanistan and Ireland have had little opportunity in the test arena, which is baffling given how little test match cricket the lower-ranked sides like Zimbabwe, Bangladesh play.
Contrast the present time to mid-90s leading up to mid-2000s, when minnows were able to pull off upsets against the likes of West Indies, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Zimbabwe or someone like John Davison was able to light up the entire World cup with his scintillating batting. Sides like Kenya were able to fully utilize these opportunities and make a name for themselves at the world stage.

  1. Funky Jersey: While sides like Australia, New Zealand still bring out innovations in their Limited overs cricket jerseys, the majority of teams play cricket in one or two (In case of a separate Twenty20 jersey) uniforms. This is a far call from the colourful 90s, where nearly every ODI tournament had their own kits and some of these memorable ones remained with the fans.
    The recent retro jersey tours in Australia (For New Zealand and India) seem to be a step in the right direction to give fans something different.
  2. The Shorter Formats: Hong Kong Sixes, Super Max and Super 8s were the T10, T20 and The Hundred of the 90s. This shows how the broadcasters and boards have always been trying to work out ways to attract a broader audience. The need for products which could satisfy the cricketing needs in a few hours as compared to 7-8 hours of an ODI or five days of a test led to these innovations. There were yearly tournaments (Hong Kong Sixes), attempts to create an international series for some of them (Super 8s) and games added to international tours (Super Max games between Black Caps and tourists like England, India etc.) to push these formats. Despite the massive success of Hong Kong Sixes, which continued quite strongly in the early years of Twenty20 (losing the fizz only around recent years), these formats couldn’t quite take over.
    Still there were several interesting aspects about these formats which are remembered fondly, like Batsmen retiring after reaching a particular score in Hong Kong Sixes, the ‘max zone’ and the two ten-over innings formula of Super Max.
  3. All Stars Encounters: These encounters allowed the viewers to enjoy the best of players in a relaxed atmosphere. These games didn’t have an international status and were organized for a cause. It seems almost unreal today to find that most of the full-time players participated in these encounters. From the Tendulkar-De Silva special trumping Chanderpaul in 1998 in MCC vs Rest of the World encounter to Michael Bevan’s unreal knock for rest of the world XI vs Asia in 2000, these games will forever be etched in the memories of cricket fans.

Part of the 90s charm was the fact that even though there were a limited number of international sides, the difference between the good, mediocre and average wasn’t as pronounced as it might have been in any other cricketing period. This along with the fact that there was always some ODI tournament on the brink, allowed for a number of match-ups and rivalries to build up, the kind of which one won’t see today unless in a world cup or a test tour.



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/2NJf87t

Monday, February 15, 2021

England’s Spinners: Are They Good Enough to Secure Ashes Success in 2021-22?

When England last won the Ashes series in 2015, they did so with Adil Rashid and Moeen Ali in the squad. Although the former didn’t play, his inclusion showcased England’s desire to call on spin if required. Ali, on the other hand, enjoyed a fruitful campaign, taking 12 wickets. This proved to be the joint-second highest total in the England team, level with Steven Finn, and nine wickets behind Stuart Broad. Although the 33-year-old would play again in both 2017-18 and 2019, he couldn’t replicate his success.

Fascinatingly, England were also victorious on four occasions between 2005 and 2013, and, during that time, could rely on Graeme Swann. Although a top-level spin bowler doesn’t guarantee England the series, recent results indicate that it undoubtedly helps their chances. So, do the 32-time Ashes winners have enough quality in their spin attack to cause problems in 2021-22 and will they be the favourites to win the event at sports betting operators?

Needing to Find Their Own Lyon

During the previous two Ashes series, England have come unstuck at the hands of Australia’s world-class bowling attack. Along with the pace of Josh Hazlewood, Mitchell Starc and Pat Cummins, they also have Nathan Lyon in their ranks. Arguably the world’s best spin bowler, alongside Ravichandran Ashwin, the 33-year-old took 21 wickets in 2017-18 and a further 20 in 2019, including four in the second innings of the fifth test.

Perhaps this showcases why England were unsuccessful during the last series. Throughout the event, England and Australia’s pace bowlers were evenly matched, with Jofra Archer and Stuart Broad taking a combined 45 wickets, compared to Cummins’ and Hazlewood’s 49. Jack Leach, England’s spinner of choice, ended the series as England’s third-highest wicket-taker with a total of 12. Although impressive, the left-hander finished the tournament eight wickets behind Lyon.

<iframe width=”560″ height=”315″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/rDg0vUwA0dY” frameborder=”0″ allow=”accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture” allowfullscreen></iframe>

Although not a knock on Leach’s ability, it’s more of an insight into the difference in quality between both sides’ spin attacks. For example, in the second innings of the first test, Lyon took six wickets for 49 runs. During that outing, he dismissed Jason Roy, Joe Root, Joe Denly, Ben Stokes, Moeen Ali, and Broad.

Who Will Step Up to the Plate?

Ahead of the 2021-22 Ashes series, England are seeking to strengthen their spin department. As such, they’ve called on Jeetan Patel to be their spin coach. The 40-year-old believes that Leach can cause problems Down Under, describing the 33-year-old as a “bit of a pest”. At the time of writing, the Taunton-born left-arm orthodox bowler has taken 50 wickets across his 13 Test match appearances. During that time, he’s recorded an average of 30.46 and an economy of 3.00.

<iframe width=”560″ height=”315″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/L7Ovm7zSX0M” frameborder=”0″ allow=”accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture” allowfullscreen></iframe>

Leach will likely be the favourite to lead England’s spin attack against the Baggy Greens in the upcoming Ashes series, but he isn’t the only bowler in the equation. Moeen Ali will also be in the conversation, as will Dom Bess, who’s got 36 wickets to his name in 13 Test matches. Questions also surround Rashid’s future, as he has long been struggling with a shoulder injury. Although they have options at their disposal, England currently lack a world-class spinner like they previously had in Swann.

That said, if their current crop can step up the plate, then the Ashes series will likely be a closely-contested event and one that fans can follow at sports betting sites. At Royal Panda’s bet in cricket markets, spectators can explore various opportunities, including odds on the 2021-22 Ashes, as well as one-day matches, T20s, and the Indian Premier League. Moreover, with live betting odds on offer, should England’s spinners hit the ground running, then outright markets may swing in their favour as they seek their 33rd victory.

Can They Take Their Games Up a Level?

Between now and the start of the upcoming Ashes, all eyes will be on the form and threat of England’s spinners. Thankfully, Root’s team have no shortage of spin bowlers at their disposal, and each will be out to show that they deserve to lead the attack. Who gets chosen, however, remains to be seen.



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/3dgkRN0

Wednesday, February 10, 2021

Is Steve Smith past his best?

For many cricket fans, Steve Smith has been the best Australian batsman since Don Bradman. But the 31-year old suffered an inconsistent batting display in Australia’s recent Test series defeat by India. It marked yet another troubling moment in Smith’s cricketing career and there have been many who’ve suggested that he could be past his best.

Like most cricketers, Smith suffered from a lack of playing time in 2020 due to the Covid-19 pandemic. As such, hopes were high that the batsman would be back to real form for the Indian tour of Australia.

Smith got off to a very strong start in the first of the one-day internationals. Here the star smashed a century of just 62 balls which was the third-fastest ever recorded by an Australian. What’s remarkable is that Smith followed this up in the second match in Sydney by getting another hundred in the same amount of balls. All of which meant that Smith was awarded the Player of the Series award for his phenomenal batting performances.

However this commendable achievement was quickly followed up by some inconsistent form in the T20 internationals that hinted that not everything was well with Smith. This was instantly compounded when he had a dreadful first Test match against India in Adelaide. Here he scored just one in his first innings, and one-not-out in his second.

While Australia went on to beat India thanks to that incredible low score of 36 from the tourists, it did little to improve Smith’s form. This can be seen in the fact that the Australian batsman only went on to get a duck and eight runs in the second Test match in Melbourne.

Such bad form is all the more remarkable as Smith had previously managed to get an average of over a century at the Melbourne ground. But with a dismal average of just over 26 since the 2019 Ashes, it showed that all was not well with Smith.

Many had suggested that his absence from Test match cricket in 2020 could have been the key reason for his lack of form. Smith of course has other interests outside of cricket. He is a keen racehorse owner, and one of his horses even claimed a victory in the Bankstown Sports Clubs Handicap race in 2016. While a few racing fans may have used a bonus to bet on one of Smith’s horses at one of the bookmakers featured at horsebetting.com, it’s still the cricketing arena where most people expect to see him shine.

So it was with plenty of relief that Australian cricket fans saw Smith put in an excellent innings in Sydney. This featured the 31-year old getting a fine 131 runs off 226 balls on his home ground. It was an especially noteworthy performance due to the fact that it marked the first time in 14 innings that Smith had reached a century. What made all of this the more impressive was the way in which he followed this up with an excellent 81 in the second innings.

But finding consistency has been Smith’s biggest problem in the past couple of years. So it wasn’t hugely surprising to see the star slumping to just 36 runs in the first innings in the final Test of the series at the Gabba. While he managed to get the Australian team’s top score of 55 in the third innings, it wasn’t enough to stop India putting in a stunning performance to claim the series in one of the all-time great cricketing performances.

Obviously, this being Steve Smith, it wasn’t too long before controversy reared its ugly head. In particular it was the fact that Smith was caught scuffing the guard mark of Rishabh Pant in the third Test that brought Smith back into the headlines. This followed on from the Australian captain Tim Paine getting into trouble for letting his ‘sledging’ cross the mark into plain verbal abuse.

Thankfully nothing got so bad as to repeat the ball tampering scandal that caused Smith to get banned from cricket for 12 months. But it shows that there are still numerous examples of bad behaviour in the Australian team, and that Smith is often at the heart of it.

Such bad behaviour might be permissible if Smith’s batting was up to his usual exceptional standards. But with some surprisingly bad performances against India, it’s clear that the 31-year old will need to raise his game soon. Australia’s next games are a series of T20 internationals against New Zealand from 22 February.



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/3tLt4hK

Pakistan show signs of resurgence with series win over South Africa

Pakistan cricket may have been in difficult times recently, but the nation’s cricket team have just recorded an excellent Test series victory over South Africa. This saw the hosts Pakistan cruising to a 2-0 clean sweep over the visitors and suggests that a long overdue Pakistan cricketing resurgence could finally be here.

In terms of Test rankings, Pakistan have found themselves slipping behind New Zealand, Australia, England and India in recent years. But the victory against South Africa signals the fact that there might be big changes afoot in the Pakistan team.

Pakiston’s second Test victory over South Africa in Rawalpindi showed off the bowling power of Hasan Ali. With match bowling figures of 10-114, it showed how the 26-year old is becoming a key part of the Pakistan pace attack. With further support from Shaheen Afridi’s 4-51, the South Africa batting line-up could only manage 201 in the first innings.

Left chasing an unlikely 370 in the second innings, South Africa were left short by 95 runs. Despite a spirited 108 from Aiden Markram, the Pakistan bowling attack managed to remove the last seven South African wickets for just 33 runs

Of course, the victory wasn’t just about the resurgent Pakistan bowling attack. There were strong first innings batting performances from Babar Azam and Faheem Ashraf who scored 77 and 78 not out respectively after Pakistan slumped to 22-3. Such batting collapses will need to be fixed if Pakistan wishes to stay competitive in the future.

But it was Mohammed Rizwan’s unbeaten 115 in the second innings that probably put the game beyond South Africa’s reach. Plus the tail-ender Nauman Ali managed to score an impressive 45 runs off 78 balls to make sure that South Africa faced a near-impossible task to win the game.

Nauman had previously impressed during his debut outing in the first Test against South Africa. At 34-years of age, Nauman might have taken his time in reaching international level cricket, but he produced excellent figures of 5-35 in the visitor’s second innings. Further strong bowling performances were shown with Yasir Shah’s match figures of 7-133.

The first Test also gave Fawad Alam further opportunities to show his batting prowess. The 35-year old was given the Player of the Match award after his 109 rescued the Pakistan batting that had slumped to 36-4. It was a remarkable performance from Fawad who continues his impressive run since returning to the Pakistan squad after an absence of more than a decade.

Credit must  also be given to the Pakistan captain Babar Azam who planned for the slower track of Karachi with intelligent changes in the bowling attack and fielding. With positives taken from both batting and bowling, it’s understandable why many of the bookmakers featured at https://www.captaingambling.com/sports-betting/ are now starting to shorten their odds for further Pakistan success in Test match cricket.

The victories over South Africa will have been all the more enjoyable in light of a disastrous series in New Zealand earlier in the winter. While New Zealand are arguably the best Test cricket team in the world, there was little excuse for Pakistan’s performance in the second Test. This saw Pakistan losing by an innings and 176 runs. It was a bitter experience for the Pakistan batsmen who proved to be completely unable to deal with the bowling attack of Kyle Jamieson.

The fact that New Zealand scored 659-6 with a double century from Kane Williamson gave Pakistan all of the impetus they needed to rethink their bowling attack. While the first Test in New Zealand was much tighter, the whole series underlined just how far Pakistan have to go to stay competitive.

Following a series of three one-day internationals against South Africa, Pakistan can then start making preparations for a summer white ball series in England. This is the England team who have just scored a remarkable first Test victory over India in Chennai, and Pakistan will need to raise their game to compete. But after a positive result against South Africa, it seems that the future is looking increasingly positive for the Pakistan cricket team.



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/370y4Ft

Reasons for England’s epic first Test victory over India

While England’s Test match team have been looking increasingly promising over the past year, few people would have expected the side to enjoy such a comfortable win over India in Chennai. This saw the visitors claiming a famous victory by a remarkable 227 wins. But was it down to England’s superiority, or were India to blame for their own downfall?

The focal point of the game was undoubtedly Joe Root’s commanding 218 in the first innings. This ultimately set up the win by taking the first innings total up to 578, and there were also valuable contributions from Ben Stokes as well as a critical 87 from the relatively new opener Dom Sibley.

But much of the credit has to be given to the England bowlers James Anderson and Jack Leach. India had been given the tough task of reaching the world record target of 420 on the last day. But Anderson and Leach picked up bowling figures of 3-17 and 4-76 to bring India’ second innings total to just 192.

In particular, it was Anderson’s incredible bowling spell that saw him taking the wickets of Shubman Gill and Ajinkya Rahane in the same over. This was swiftly followed up by getting the pivotal wicket of Rishabh Pant. Plus with a great 4-76 by Dom Bess in India’s first innings along with some important wickets for Jofra Archer, it showed that England’s bowlers are capable of producing some big results on a fairly unpromising pitch.

The sheer nature of the victory was hugely impressive. England were widely seen as being complete underdogs heading into this four-game Test series. Even by using this bookmaker comparison, cricket fans may have been unable to find a bookie who’d have been willing to put England down as being the favourites to win this game. But in the end, the visitors proved triumphant and recorded a famous win.

The idea of beating India on home soil initially seemed laughable. After all, this is Virat Kohli’s team who have only lost one of their last 35 home Tests. But India simply weren’t up for the challenge in Chennai.

Several key players like Ajinkya Rahane seemed to be struggling with form and Shahbaz Nadeem failed to have much of an impact with the bat or ball. Of course, this is India and there will always be plenty of positives to take from even the most underwhelming of games.

In particular Kohli put in a typically commanding batting display on the final day that threatened to take the game to a draw. Plus the spinner Ravichandran Ashwin once again showed that he is one of the best in the world thanks to his nine-wicket haul.

It’s also important to note that India have already shown that they are more than capable of overcoming even the largest setback. The recent Test series victory over Australia is a case in point. This saw India recording their lowest-ever total of just 36 runs in Test cricket, before producing a miraculous performance to claim the series by reaching a fourth-innings 329 run target.

All of which raises expectations of what will happen when the second Test takes place on 13 February. India will know that they have to put greater pressure on England. The team’s fielding was distinctly sub-par in the first Test, plus there will be much greater demands made from India’s bowlers.

England will be hoping to build on the confidence gained from the first Test. While the result made it 11-unbeaten Tests under the Root captaincy, there are still issues regarding the team’s batting line-up. Both Rory Burns and Dan Lawrence will have felt that they could have done better, and they’ll be desperate for another chance to prove themselves.

It all comes at a pivotal time for both teams. This summer will see the World Test Championship taking place, and England will have to win this series at least 3-1 in order to reach the final. The good news is that England have just claimed the top spot of the standings, but India will be desperate to redress the balance in the next Test match.



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/2OnQZ6S

Monday, February 8, 2021

Top 10 Biggest Cricket Stadiums in India

The popularity of cricket has spread over the globe attracting more followers, participants, and just fans. As cricket was born in India, this is a merit of Indians to make it so popular and exciting. It’s not a simple game for them, it’s a religion they do appreciate and invest in so much.

Thus, Indians have done a lot to enhance this area in modern times by providing the best places to hold cricket tournaments within the country and empowering their partners in cricket competitions to feel gorgeous and worthy to combat on the best cricket stadiums in the world. All the matches and tournaments are available online on the best bookie’s platform via the link  https://in.parimatch.com/en/cricket-ipl/ which are broadcasting directly from the greatest cricket stadiums of India. There are 52 international cricket venues in India. It is more than any other country may have.

10 Biggest Cricket Stadiums in India

Since the first Test Match was hosted in 1933, a lot has changed. India has modernized the main grounds with top-notch facilities. Here is the list of the largest cricket grounds in India.

  1. Sardar Patel Stadium, Ahmedabad

(stadium_1)

Constructed in 1983, renovated in 2006, and redeveloped in February 2020, Sardar Patel (also known as Motera Stadium) is now considered the largest cricket stadium in the world with a capacity of 110,000.

This is the significant ground where Sunil Gavaskar became the first person to score 10,000 in Test Cricket, Kapil Dev took his 432nd wicket to surpass Sir Richard Hadlee’s world record at the time.

  1. Eden Gardens, Kolkata

(stadium_2)

The Eden Gardens is the oldest (established in 1867) and the second biggest cricket stadium in India after the newly-built Sardar Patel Stadium. Its current capacity is 80,000 that was reduced from 100,000+ in 2011 according to construction and renovations. The stadium is a home ground for IPL team Kolkata Knight Riders.

  1. Rajiv Gandhi International Cricket Stadium, Hyderabad

(stadium_3)

Formerly known as Visakha Stadium, it is operated and owned by the Hyderabad Cricket Association (HCA), and has a capacity of about 55,000. It is a home venue for the matches of the IPL team Sunriseres Hyderabad.

  1. Greenfield International Stadium, Thiruvananthapuram

(stadium_4)

Also called the Sports Hub, it is mostly used for Cricket and Association Football as this playing arena has been constructed in terms of FIFA and ICC norms and regulations. The stadium has a capacity of about 55,000 and is the first eco-friendly stadium in India.

  1. A. Chidambaram Stadium, Chennai

(stadium_5)

Popularly the stadium is known as the Chepauk Stadium. The stadium has a capacity of about 54,000 and is a home venue of the IPL team Chennai Super Kings. The very first Test victory of India was reported exactly on this stadium.

  1. JSCA International Stadium Complex, Ranchi

(stadium_6)

The total capacity of the stadium is about 50,000. It is the first stadium in India that has grassy banks as found in New Zealand and South Africa. Also, the stadium provides an Indoor Cricket Center having three indoor pitches and a residential complex.

  1. Bharat Ratna Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee Ekana Cricket Stadium, Lucknow

(stadium_7)

The stadium has a capacity of about 50,000 and is operated by the Ekana Sports City. Some memorable dates are fixed on this stadium like Rohit Sharma became the first cricketer who scored four centuries in T20l.

  1. Barabati Stadium, Cuttack

(stadium_8)

The stadium is usually used for cricket, football, field hockey, and sometimes concerts. It has a capacity of about 45,00 and is a regular venue for one-day Internationals.

  1. Vidarbha Cricket Association Stadium, Nagpur

(stadium_9)

The New VCA Stadium has a capacity of about 45,000 and is considered the largest cricket stadium in India in terms of the playing area. It has an 80-yard straight boundary and 85 yards square boundaries.

  1. Arun Jaitley Stadium, New Delhi

(stadium_10)

It is the second oldest cricket stadium in India after the Eden Gardens. Its capacity is about 41,000. It is famous for great victories by Anil Kumble, Sunil Gavaskar, and Sachin Tendulkar.



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/3aIcdnr

Sunday, February 7, 2021

Going against the Grain

“…You just don’t turn it off! It wasn’t my war! You asked me, I didn’t ask you! And I did what I had to do to win! But somebody wouldn’t let us win!”

These are the words uttered by Marcus Stoinis after almost singlehandedly propelling Australia to a win with a splendid 146 against New Zealand, only for his efforts to go in vain John Rambo in First Blood.

The portrait created is of a combatant in the aftermath of a disastrous conflict, who is not ready to give in to forces of man or nature. A one-man army if you may. To draw a parallel to this situation in the game of cricket, a match where everything is lost and done for, only for one player to keep fighting till the end.

This is not without examples in individual games but what about an entire Test series? A player outplaying the rest of his side is exceptional in itself, however, the stakes are raised higher when performances around him have been below par throughout the tour.

But how would one define a series as where ‘everything is lost and done for’? For that, we would consider those series where the team with adverse results against its name has lost all (or nearly all) of the games. In other words, they stood little chance of winning any game.

In this article, we will take a look at such exceptional batting performances over the last twenty years.

  1. Rahul Dravid vs England (2011): India entered England as the World Cup holders, ranked first in Test match cricket and on the back of an all-format win in West Indies. They were yet to lose a Test series under the captaincy of MS Dhoni.

They returned without an international win on the tour, being wiped out 0-4 in the Test series. Injuries and bad form caught Indian players like a plague as they weren’t able to show even a semblance of fight barring for a few sessions in Trent Bridge.

This seemed to have no consequence on Rahul Dravid, the indomitable wall of Indian cricket for over a decade and a half. He stood tall in what was the sternest Test of Indian team since the 1999 tour down under. The 38-year-old was the third highest run getter in the series at an average of nearly 77, scoring three centuries and facing 965 balls. The next best for India were Sachin Tendulkar averaging at 34 and MS Dhoni at 31.

His exceptional performance also included instances of him carrying the bat, remaining 146 unbeaten in the final Test at the Oval. Unfortunately for India, this was to be one of the last moments of Dravid in whites for he retired in 2012.

  1. Mohammad Yousuf vs England (2006): Pakistan of mid-2000s weren’t the strongest of sides that Pakistan have possessed. Yet, they still had the talent from late 90s and early 2000s to bank upon.

Apart from the fact that they were touring England, a place where they hadn’t lost in a long time, they had experienced a turnaround of fortunes under Bob Woolmer. They had beaten England, India and Sri Lanka in the 2005-06 season and with England under the pump after defeats against Sri Lanka, they might have fancied their chances again in a country that always seemed to favour their skills.

England came on the top winning the series 3-0, with Pakistan coming close to a positive result only in the final game (though England seemed to be hanging in there at 298-4) which ended in what is known as the Oval Test controversy. But an English side missing many of their Ashes 2005 stars such as Ashley Giles, Simon Jones, Michael Vaughan and Andrew Flintoff, was able to dominate proceedings on back of young stars like Cook, Bell, Pietersen and Panesar with able guidance from likes of Strauss and Harmison.

Pakistan on the other hand saw disappointing performances from most of their players. They would’ve stood a better chance if some of their bowlers had exchanged their averages with the batsmen. Only players who stood out were Younis Khan, Umar Gul and Mohammad Yousuf.

Mohammad Yousuf in particular batted as if on another plane. Not only was he the highest run-getter in the series (631, next best from either side was Andrew Strauss at 444) he averaged 90 per innings with three centuries.

But then it shouldn’t have been a surprise to many as 2006 was his year. His 1788 Test runs in that calendar year are still a world record. Interestingly, Yousuf would only score a solitary Test hundred after his annus mirabilis.

  1. Shivnarine Chanderpaul v England (2007): Chanderpaul was a man who often played the role of a monk in a side usually caught in chaos for the majority of his playing career. (Though not by any means incapable of letting himself loose, as his 69 ball hundred versus Australia and various adventures as an opener in limited overs cricket would Testify)

In 2007, he found himself up against the challenge of England after the great Brian Lara had retired during the world cup. West Indies in white kits were no longer a force to reckon with and it showed in the 0-3 result. Chanderpaul though, used to performing in adverse situations for some years now, was the second highest run-getter of the series only twenty runs behind Kevin Pietersen. (He featured in three Tests as compared to Pietersen’s four)

He batted in five innings and was able to cross fifty in each of them, ending with an average of 148.66 for his effort. His contribution for the tour didn’t end there as he continued his form in a tied twenty20 series and an ODI series which West Indies ended up winning.

Additional Fact: Chanderpaul was often among the few men standing for West Indies in a tough decade. He rendered a very similar performance at home versus Australia in 2008, crossing fifty in five of his six innings in that series as well. And along with Chris Gayle he was the one of the top two run-getters in the Wisden trophy 2004, which England won 4-0 at home.

  1. Andy Flower vs India (2000) and South Africa (2001): The ‘Flower Power’ years or the time when Andy Flower entered the ‘zone’ and refused to leave. Zimbabwe can rightly call late 90s to early 2000s the golden period for their side. This period saw them challenge the top sides of the world, beat them in Test series and at the world stage.

This was no doubt down to the fact that their greaTest ever batsman Andy Flower played in this period. In the above two instances, he bested the likes of Dravid, Kallis, Tendulkar, Kirsten, Ganguly and Gibbs.

Across eight innings in these two series, he crossed fifty on seven occasions. While Zimbabwe lost both the series, they were able to draw two Tests which was no mean achievement for them, given that India were one of the toughest assignments to tour and South Africa were one of the best sides in the world. His finest moment came in the defeats, where he scored 341 runs in Harare and 253 in Delhi. These are second and ninth most runs by a batsman in a Test defeat. South Africa and India won the Tests convincingly but not before Andy Flower had left his mark on the game.

He scored 540 runs at the average of 270 in India and 422 at 211 versus South Africa.

  1. Brian Lara vs Sri Lanka (2001): Or the reason why this list exists. His 351 vs Sri Lanka in Colombo are the most runs by a batsman in a Test defeat. Vaas and Murali picked 26 and 24 wickets at the average of 15 and 22 respectively as West Indies were routed in all the games. (Losing by 10 wickets, 131 runs and 10 wickets)

Ramnaresh Sarwan proved to be a capable ally of Lara scoring 318 runs at an average of 53. What makes Lara’s run majestic is that his total of 688 at 114.66, dwarfed even the second best West Indian effort in a series where most of the West Indian batters failed to find a solution to the Murali-Vaas combination.

If we take out Sarwan’s contribution, Lara alone scored more than rest of his team-mates combined. His scores read 178, 40, 74, 45, 221 and 130. The corresponding team scores were 448, 144, 191, 190, 390 and 262.

Defeats can take a toll on even the best of batsmen irrespective of the form with which they enter into the series or the form they display for the first few innings. When in full-flow Lara created his own rhythm, regardless of the collapses around him. This is what helped him score exceptionally in Sri Lanka and in several other encounters where West Indies were not up to the mark. Given the state of things, many of his great knocks ended up in failures in the latter half of his career, but this shouldn’t take away from his performances.



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/3jquucQ

What are some most important cricket rules?

Cricket is perhaps the most well-known game on the planet that has been bringing together countries on the field since its prominence. Watching cricket can be difficult on the off chance that you don’t have the foggiest idea about the guidelines administering the game. Here are the fundamental principles of cricket that will assist you with understanding the game better.

Equipment required

On a basic level, the game of cricket requires a ball, a bat, and wickets. 

Players

The game of cricket is played between two teams, each of which has 11 players. These 11 players comprise batsmen, bowlers, and a wicket keeper. The teams also have a reserve player, who is used in case any of the 11 players get injured. Each team has a captain. This player is principally answerable for guaranteeing that a team has only 11 players on the field at some random time and they perform to the best of their ability. While every player may have an expert job they can take up any roles should they wish.

Umpire

To apply the cricket rules and ensure the rules of the game are maintained all through the game there are two umpires set up during games. These umpires are liable for making decisions about the game and telling the scorers of these judgments.

The two umpires are set up on the field while there is additionally a third umpire off the field who is responsible for video choices. This is used in the cases where the decision for the umpires on the field is too difficult to make and they allude to the third umpire who surveys slow motion video replays to settle on a choice. The umpire is the last expert in the match. Players who neglect to follow guidelines or who scoff at an umpire’s choice will be sent to the captain for release or other measures.

Cricket field

The match is typically played on a huge oval shaped field. This field has a 22 yard pitch at the center. Three wickets are set at the end of the pitch. Ground sizes differ enormously in this game yet are normally played on a round grass field with a periphery of around 200m. Around the edge of the field is the boundary, which is fundamentally the line between being in play and out of play.

 

PakistanSouthAfrica

 

Objective

In a match, one side takes a go to bat and score runs, while the other team will bowl and handle the ball to limit the resistance from scoring. The main objective in cricket is to score however many runs as could reasonably be expected against the adversary. Before the match starts, the captains will flip a coin, with the winner of the throw having the option to choose which team bats and fields first.

How it is played 

When the game is in advancement, every one of the 11 individuals from the fielding team must be on the field, however, just two individuals from the batting team are permitted to be on the playing ground. A player is chosen from the fielding team and he is known as the bowler. The bowler will at that point endeavor to hit the wicket with the ball, while a wicket keeper will be behind the wicket to get the ball in the event that it misses. The other 9 players from the fielding team will also be on the ground and will try to catch the ball, which is hit by the batsmen.

stockimage1

 

The batsman will endeavor to hit the bowled ball before it hits the wicket. The job of the batsman is to keep the wicket from getting hit by the ball, by batting the ball away. Also, to score a run, both batsmen need to run from their individual wickets to the next whatever the number of occasions as would be prudent after a ball has been hit.

Scores

A run is scored when a batsman hits the ball with their bat and the two batsmen at the wicket are able to effectively rush to the opposite end. The batsmen can run however many times as they like prior to stopping till the bowler gets the ball. On the off chance that the ball crosses the boundary after getting bounced at being hit by the bat then 4 runs are given. In the event that the ball goes over the rope without bouncing, at that point 6 runs are granted to the batting team.

 

indiateamcelebrating

 

Winners

The batting team will attempt to score however many runs as could be expected under the circumstances in the apportioned time while the bowling team will attempt to stop them by fielding. After one inning, both the teams swap their positions. The team that makes the most runs at the end is the winner.



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/3aNelui

Saturday, February 6, 2021

Denzil Batchelor

Denzil Batchelor was born in India in 1906. His family were not short of intellect. His father and grandfather were both High Court Judges. His mother did not, in the manner of the times, have a profession of her own but was a voracious reader of books and a not untalented writer herself, who had a novel published in later life.

Between the ages of three and thirteen, during which period he was sent to England to be educated, Batchelor saw his father only once, and was effectively brought up by his grandparents. At thirteen however, unusually, he returned to India. A bout of pneumonia had developed into malnutrition. There is therefore a slight irony in the fact that, having been built back up and returning to England in 1922, Batchelor then began a lifelong and unequal struggle with his weight.

After his return Batchelor attended a minor public school, Trent College in the East Midlands. From there he went up to Oxford to read English. He had had some poetry he had written published in India, and whilst at Trent some interest was shown in his work. At University Batchelor enjoyed himself, but still found time to get his degree. His more successful sporting endeavours were in the boxing ring and on the rugby field, although he did not get a blue. Cricket he clearly enjoyed, and he even founded his own team, ‘The Batchelors’, but he does not seem to have been a particularly talented player.

After graduation Batchelor worked in London as a journalist but soon accepted a job with a newspaper in Sydney. The problem Batchelor had with that one was that as soon as he turned up for work he realised that the paper was about to fold. There followed a difficult time financially in which he attempted a career as a vacuum cleaner seller, and as a rep for a mobile library. He even claimed to have, completely unsuccessfully, tried prospecting for gold.

Eventually Batchelor’s resourcefulness saw him through the crisis. He began by hiring small venues and giving talks on aspects of English Literature for which he charged an entrance fee. These lectures proved popular and led to further work as a Batchelor met people who could give him a route back into journalism. He was very much a generalist, and certainly didn’t limit himself to sport. In time he was one of those who helped establish Woman magazine. Batchelor also found his way into broadcasting, and became the film critic for the ABC.

By the end of 1936 Batchelor was ready to return to England but, chastened no doubt by his previous migration, he made sure he left Australia with plenty of commissions for work from press and broadcasters. He then returned to London via Indonesia (then the Dutch East Indies) and wrote about what he found there, before moving on to Spain to report on the Civil War.

Once he got back from Spain Batchelor decided that a good way to earn a living was to interview interesting people for his Australian connections. The likes of Hugh Walpole, Compton Mackenzie, Hilaire Belloc and Somerset Maugham are not such famous names today, but back in the late 1930s their thoughts, particularly when skilfully interviewed, were much in demand.

It was in the late 1930s that Batchelor began a long association with Charles ‘CB’ Fry. The pair had not dissimilar backgrounds and Batchelor has often been said to be one of the few men Fry met who could hold his own in conversation with the great man. The most famous example of that was an occasion when Fry announced that, fed up with people asking him about cricket, he was going to turn to horse racing, something else at which he would excel. Batchelor’s rejoinder to this was along the lines of: Really Charles? What as? Owner, trainer, jockey …….. or horse?

As to the role that Batchelor played where Fry is concerned he is often described as secretary, although the arrangement seems to have been rather more of an ad hoc one than a structured employment. Batchelor’s main task was to assist Fry in putting together his 1939 autobiography, Life Worth Living. Batchelor himself gives the impression that he did little more than write down what Fry told him, although it seems that in truth his role, whilst perhaps not that of a ghostwriter as such, was rather more than just taking dictation.

When the Second World War broke out in 1939 Batchelor, by then 33, joined up and became a Lieutenant in the Army, eventually rising to the rank of Major. His role was not a military one however, and he utilised his journalistic skills in a new propaganda department, reporting to the Director of Military Intelligence.

After the war ended Batchelor went back to journalism. He reported on sport for The Times and spent a number of years as Sports Editor of the magazine Picture Post. He wrote for a number of other publications as well and particularly, in the 1960s, for Playfair Cricket Monthly. One rather less successful venture was a brief period in which Batchelor was entrusted with the then well known William Hickey gossip problem in the Daily Express, in respect of which he found the editorial interference from on high too much for him.

Over his lifetime Batchelor wrote almost forty books. Many were on subjects other than cricket. His first book, that appeared when he was only 21, was a collection of poetry. A number were on the subject of boxing, and one was a history of association football. One of Batchelor’s own favourites was a history of horse racing, and he also published a book on wine, another area of expertise. There were novels as well, general fiction and crime fiction and, as we will see, one work of cricket fiction. Batchelor wrote a few plays as well, one of which at least was used by the BBC.

The cricket novel mentioned was the only Batchelor book published whilst he was in Australia and indeed was, the early collection of poetry apart, the only book from him to appear before he was 40. The Test Match Murder began with England’s leading batsman walking out to bat in an important match, pulling on his batting gloves and being poisoned by a concealed pin. In Batchelor’s own words it then contained a dope gang, a murder in Sydney’s Chinatown, a car chase with a villain shooting good and bad alike as he swerved round corkscrew curves on two wheels, with a final plunged suicide from the topmost pinnacle of the Harbour Bridge.

The book has not, that I have read, received much in the way of acclaim but Batchelor, who I get the impression recognised its limitations, felt it sold reasonably well and, more importantly, that it was the book that persuaded the Sydney Morning Herald to take him on to provide day to day reports on the 1936/37 Ashes Tests that were designed to out-Cardus Cardus

Batchelor’s first book of cricket fact was The Game Goes On, which appeared in 1947. The publisher’s blurb brought another suggestion that Batchelor’s work might, during the great man’s absence in Australia, be considered a substitute for that of Cardus. It is a collection of match reports and other essays, some of which had already appeared elsewhere, notably in the Sydney Morning Herald.

In 1949 the same publisher, Eyre and Spottiswoode, published a not dissimilar collection of Batchelor’s work, Days Without Sunset. That book largely consists of Batchelor’s reports on the 1948 Invincibles’ series, but also has a few other essays including some on the 1948 London Olympics, boxing, racing and rugby union. It is also a book that, at a time when such were almost always disappointing, has an excellent dust jacket.

The following year saw another book with Batchelor’s name on its spine, this time The Match I Remember, albeit the eleven main chapters were contributed by a selection of Test cricketers. The clue is in the title of course, and the fact that the same format has been reprised by so many editors in the succeeding years is testament to the fact that it is a decent formula, and one that sells well.

A year later and a biography of Fry appeared in a series of short 64 page biographies published by Phoenix House. Batchelor knew Fry sufficiently well that this could have been a valuable book. Unfortunately however Batchelor seemed oblivious to his friend’s faults and what might have been an interesting book ended up as just another account of Fry’s achievements.

1952 saw the release of The Book of Cricket: A Gallery of Great Players from W.G. Grace to the Present Day, which was a substantial quarto and the sort of coffee table book that the 1950s saw coming into vogue. In truth the photographs are a little disappointing, and not so impressive as the similar sort of books that had appeared in the late Victorian era, but Batchelor’s pen portraits impressed John Arlott who observed that he performed excellently, condensing the historic and personal qualities of his two hundred great players with rare felicity.

It must be assumed that The Match I Remember sold well as in 1953 Batchelor produced Game of a Lifetime, a very similar format save that on this occasion the writing was all Batchelor’s, based on conversations with eleven famous cricketers, and a closing conversation with poet and author Edmund Blunden. Reviewing the book for The Cricketer GD Martineau clearly enjoyed it, and Batchelor must have enjoyed reading the observation that: the atmosphere of suspense that accompanies collapse or sorely needed stand has been admirably conveyed.

For the rest of the 1950s Batchelor’s cricketing output was limited to souvenirs of the Ashes series of 1953, 1954/55 and 1956, although a number of books on other subjects also appeared before, in 1961, he published an autobiography, Babbled of Green Fields. There is not much cricket in the book, but there are a few interesting observations on Fry, and the sole chapter devoted to the game contains some interesting observations on the Bodyline series, the Allen trip to Australia four years later and the generally poorly chronicled 1938 series.

In 1964 for the one and only time in his career Batchelor was commissioned to write an account of a Test series, that summer’s Ashes series. The Test Matches of 1964 was published by Epworth Press and is a traditional tour account, albeit a well written one. 

What turned out to be Batchelor’s last book appeared in 1966, a collaboration with Learie Constantine entitled The Changing Face of Cricket. The book begins with a substantial essay on the history of the game from Batchelor, which leads into a similar length contribution from Constantine on the growth of cricket in the West Indies before Batchelor looks at post war cricket and what he describes as a Defensive Game in much shorter order. The pair then combine in a closing chapter which sets out an eight point plan for the future.

Were Batchelor and Constantine visionaries? I’m afraid the answer is no. None of their ideas have ever gained any real traction (save a plea for fast true wickets) and some of their suggestions, like reducing Test and county matches to four and two days respectively were doubtless as unpopular then as they are now. In truth their views are pretty reactionary, calling for the return of the old lbw and no ball laws, and certainly making no suggestions for one day cricket, even though by the time their book appeared the Gillette Cup had been part of English cricket for three summers.

Denzil Batchelor was only 63 when he died of a heart attack in 1969, at which point he was part way through editing a book that would eventually appear a year later, Great Cricketers, a collection of around sixty pen portraits by a wide variety of writers. 

Unlike some of his contemporaries, such as Cardus and Arlott, Batchelor’s is not a name that resonates down the years as a cricket writer, but his work is nonetheless worth revisiting and Babbling of Green Fields in particular is an interesting account of a life well lived. As a highly intelligent and articulate man with many and varying interests Batchelor was an excellent wordsmith and the comparisons with Cardus are not entirely inappropriate given that both could tell a story and hold an audience.



from Cricket Web https://ift.tt/3tyQMxA